Experimental study on the effects of the ignition parameters on the spark characteristics and the flame propagation of premixed methane

Abstract

The charging time and the electrode gap distance are very important ignition parameters for the spark ignition process. The effects of these two parameters on the spark characteristics and the flame propagation of premixed methane–air mixtures were investigated experimentally at a constant pressure and a constant temperature by using a constant-volume bomb and a high-speed schlieren system. The parameters of the spark characteristics, including the spark voltage, the spark current, the spark duration and the lean burn ignition limit, were experimentally measured, and the spark resistance and the ignition energy were calculated on the basis of these parameters. By comparing the schlieren photographs of laminar flame propagation in different conditions taken by the high-speed schlieren devices, the effects of the ignition parameters on the cross-sectional area of the flame, the flame radius and the speed of flame propagation were analysed. The results show that the charging time and the electrode gap distance have important influences on the early kernel formation. Increasing the charging time or the electrode gap distance can significantly increase the influences of the effective radius of ignition and the original kernel size, can increase the ignition energy and can promote kernel development and flame propagation. Increasing the charging time or the electrode gap distance can effectively increase the lean burn ignition limit but, when the electrode gap distance increases to a certain extent, only increasing the charging time can increase the lean burn ignition limit further.

Keywords

Spark ignition methane–air mixtures ignition parameters constant-volume bomb spark characteristics flame propagation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lewis

von Elbe

. Combustion, flames and explosions of gases. 3rd edition. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press, 1987, pp. 335–360.

Thiele

Selle

Riedel

. Numerical simulation of spark ignition including ionization. Proc Combust Inst 2000; 28: 1177–1185.

Lim

Anderson

Arpaci

. Prediction of spark kernel development in constant Volume. Combust Flame 1987; 69: 303–316.

Han

Yamashita

Hayashi

. Numerical study on the spark ignition characteristics of a methane–air mixture using detailed chemical kinetics. Combust Flame 2010; 157: 1414–1421.

Song

Sunwoo

. An experimental study on engine performance with high ignition energy. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2002; 216(6): 505–513.

Cairns

Zhang

Dingle

. The effects of dual-coil ignition and axial swirl on spark-assisted controlled autoignition. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2014; 228(9): 991–1003.

Stone

Steele

. Measurement and modeling of ignition system energy and its effect on engine performance. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 1989; 203(4): 277–286.

Yossefi

Maskell

Ashcroft

. Ignition source characteristics for natural-gas-burning vehicle engines. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2000; 214(2): 171–180.

Lee

Hall

Ezekoye

. Voltage and energy deposition characteristics of spark ignition systems. SAE paper 2005-01-0231, 2005.

10.

Yuasa

Kadota

Tsue

. Effects of energy deposition schedule on minimum ignition energy in spark ignition of methane/air mixtures. Proc Combust Inst 2002; 29: 743–750.

11.

Stevens

Pertl

Hoke

. Comparative testing of a novel microwave ignition source, the quarter wave coaxial cavity igniter. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2011; 225(12): 1633–1645.

12.

Pertl

Smith

. Electromagnetic design of a novel microwave internal combustion engine ignition source, the quarter wave coaxial cavity igniter. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2009; 223(11): 1405–1418.

13.

Suess

Guenthner

Schenk

. Investigation of the potential of corona ignition to control gasoline homogeneous charge compression ignition combustion. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2012; 226(2): 275–287.

14.

Kojima

Ikeda

Nakajima

. Spatially resolved measurement of OH^*, CH^*, and C₂^* chemiluminescence in the reaction zone of laminar methane/air premixed flames. Proc Combust Inst 2000; 28: 1757–1764.

15.

Blanc

Guest

von Elbe

Lewis

. Ignition of explosive gas mixtures by electric sparks. I. Minimum ignition energies and quenching distances of mixtures of methane, oxygen, and inert gases. Chem Phys 1947; 15: 798–802.

16.

Bradley

Sheppard

CGW

Suardjaja

. Fundamentals of high-energy spark ignition with lasers. Combust Flame 2004; 138: 55–77.

17.

McNeill

. Minimum ignition energy for laser spark ignition. Proc Combust Inst 2005; 30: 2913–2920.

18.

Lee

T-W

Jain

Kozola

. Measurements of minimum ignition energy by using laser sparks for hydrocarbon fuels in air: propane, dodecane, and jet-A fuel. Combust Flame 2001; 157(4): 1320–1328.

19.

Beduneaua

J-L

Kim

Zimmer

. Measurements of minimum ignition energy in premixed laminar methane/air flow by using laser induced spark. Combust Flame 2003; 132: 653–665.

20.

Arpaci

Lim

. Spark kernel development in constant volume combustion. Combust Flame 2003; 135: 315–322.

21.

Eisazadeh-Far

Parsinejad

Metghalchi

Keck

. On flame kernel formation and propagation in premixed gases. Combust Flame 2010; 157: 2211–2221.

22.

Kravchik

Sher

. Numerical modeling of spark ignition and flame initiation in a quiescent methane–air mixture. Combust Flame 1994; 99: 635–643.

23.

Nakaya

Hatori

Tsue

. Numerical analysis on flame kernel in spark ignition methane/air mixtures. J Propulsion Power 2011; 27(2): 363–370.

24.

Lian

Gao

Mannan

. Prediction of minimum ignition energy of aerosols using flame kernel modeling combined with flame front propagation theory. J Loss Prevention Process Industries 2012; 25: 103–113.

25.

Yossefi

Belmont

Ashcroft

. A comparison of the relative effects of fuel composition and ignition energy on the early stages of combustion in a natural gas spark ignition engine using simulation. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2000; 214(4): 383–393.

26.

Song

Sunwoo

. Flame kernel formation and propagation modelling in spark ignition engines. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2001; 215(1): 105–114.

27.

Meng

Kang

. Effects of direct-current (DC) electric fields on flame propagation and combustion characteristics of premixed CH₄/O₂/N₂ flames. Energy Fuels 2012; 26 (11): 6612–6620.

28.

Zaremba

Burkov

Stuntz

. Active damping of engine speed oscillations based on learning control. In: American control conference, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 21–26 June 1998, Vol 4, pp. 2143–2147. New York: IEEE.

29.

Kushner

Kimura

Byron

. Arc resistance of laser-triggered spark gaps. J Appl Phys 1985; 58(5): 1744–1751.

30.

Montaño

Becerra

Cooray

. Resistance of spark channels. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 2006; 34(5): 1610–1619.

31.

Engel

Donaldson

Kristiansen

. The pulsed discharge arc resistance and its functional behavior. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 1989; 17(2): 323–329.

32.

Van Maaren

Thung

Goey

LPH

. Measurement of flame temperature and adiabatic burning velocity of methane/air mixture. Combust Sci Technol 1994; 96(4): 327–344.

33.

Frendi

Sibulkin

. Dependence of minimum ignition energy on ignition parameters. Combust Sci Technol 1990; 73: 395–413.

Experimental study on the effects of the ignition parameters on the spark characteristics and the flame propagation of premixed methane–air mixtures

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References