This paper summarises the measured emergency braking performance of a tri-axle heavy goods vehicle semitrailer fitted with a novel pneumatic slip control braking system developed by the Cambridge Vehicle Dynamics Consortium. Straight-line braking tests were carried out from 40 km/h in order to compare a commercially electro-pneumatic available anti-lock braking system and the Cambridge Vehicle Dynamics Consortium system, which has bi-stable valves coupled with a sliding-mode slip controller. On average, the Cambridge Vehicle Dynamics Consortium system reduced the stopping distance and the air use by 15% and 22% respectively compared with those for the conventional anti-lock braking system. The most significant improvements were seen on a wet basalt-tile surface (with similar friction properties to ice) where the stopping distance and the air use were improved by 17% and 30% respectively. A third performance metric, namely the mean absolute slip error, is introduced to quantify the ability of each braking system to track a wheel slip demand. Using this metric, the bi-stable valve system is shown to improve the wheel slip demand tracking by 62% compared with that of the conventional anti-lock braking system. This improvement potentially allows more accurate control of the wheel forces during extreme manoeuvres, providing scope for the future development of advanced stability control systems.
Office of Highway Policy Information. Persons fatally injured in motor vehicle crashes 2007. Report, US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
4.
National Centre of Statistics and Analysis. 2007 large trucks traffic safety fact sheet. Report DOT HS 810 989, US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
5.
JarossiLMattesonAWoodrooffeJ. Trucks involved in fatal accidents factbook 2006. Report, The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 2008.
6.
JujnovichBOdhamsARoebuckRCebonD. Active rear steering control of a tractor–semitrailer. In: 9th international symposium of advanced vehicle control, Kobe, Japan, 5–9 October, 2008, paper 097. Tokyo: JSAE.
7.
DunnAHooverR. Class 8 truck tractor braking performance improvement study. Report DOT HS 809 700, US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
8.
ForkenbrockGFlickMGarrotW. A comprehensive light vehicle antilock brake system test track performance evaluation. SAE paper 1999-01-1287, 1998.
EmereoleO. Antilock performance comparison between hydraulic and electromechanical brake systems. Master’s Thesis, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 2003.
11.
FancherP. Generic data for representing truck tire characteristics in simulations of braking and braking-in-a-turn maneuvers. Report UMTRI 95-34, The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 1995.
12.
MillerJCebonD. A high performance pneumatic braking system for heavy vehicles. Veh System Dynamics2010; 48: 373–392.
13.
KienhöferFWCebonD. Improving ABS on heavy vehicles using slip control. In: 9th international symposium on heavy vehicles, weights and dimensions, State College, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA, 18–22 June 2006, paper 48.
14.
KawabeTNakazawaMNotsuIWatanabeY. A sliding mode controller for wheel slip ratio control system. Veh System Dynamics1997; 27: 393–408.
15.
WillAHuiSZakS. Sliding mode wheel slip controller for an antilock braking system. Int J Veh Des1998; 19: 523–539.
16.
PetersenIJohansenTAKalkkuhlJLudemannJ. Wheel slip control in ABS brakes using gain-scheduled constrained LQR. In: Conference on hybrid control and automotive applications, Berlin, Germany, 7–8 June 2001, pp. 125–145. Berlin: Springer.
17.
JohansenTAPetersenIKalkkuhlJLudemannJ. Gain-scheduled wheel slip control in automotive brake systems. IEEE Trans Control Systems Technol2003; 11: 799–811.
18.
BauerMTomizukaM. Fuzzy logic traction controllers and their effects on longitudinal vehicle platoon systems. Veh Systems Dynamics1996; 25: 277–303.
19.
KimbroughSDatlaK. An effective means for implementing wheelslip control without a ground speed sensor. Veh Systems Dynamics1996; 25: 327–339.
20.
JiangFGaoZ. An application of nonlinear PID control to a class of truck ABS problems. In: IEEE conference on decision and control, Orlando, Florida, USA, 4–7 December 2001, Vol 1, pp. 516–521. New York: IEEE.
21.
MillerJHendersonLCebonD. Designing and testing an advanced pneumatic braking system for heavy vehicles. Proc IMechE Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2013; 227: 1715–1729.
22.
KienhoferF. Heavy vehicle wheel slip control. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, 2011.
23.
MillerJCebonD. An investigation of the effects of pneumatic actuator design on slip control for heavy vehicles. Veh Systems Dynamics2013; 51: 139–164.
24.
KrishnamurthyPWenzheLKhorramiFKeyhaniA. Robust force control of an SRM-based electromechanical brake and experimental results. IEEE Trans Control Systems Technol2009; 17: 1306–1317.
25.
XiangWDRichardsonPCZhaoCMMohammadS. Automobile brake-by-wire control system design and analysis. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2008; 57: 138–145.
26.
BaloghLStreliTNemethHPalkovicsL. Modelling and simulating of self-energizing brake system. Veh Systems Dynamics2006; 44: 368–377.
27.
FoxJRobertsRBaier-WeltC. Modeling and control of a single motor electronic wedge brake. SAE paper 2007-01-0866, 2007.
28.
PalkovicsLFriesA. Intelligent electronic systems in commercial vehicles for enhanced traffic safety. Veh Systems Dynamics2001; 35: 4227–4289.
29.
SegloF. Brake-by-wire on heavy truck. In: Conference on highly automated vehicles for intelligent transport, Boras, Sweden, 21–22 June 2011, paper 9.
30.
MillerJCebonD. Modelling and performance of a pneumatic brake actuator. Proc IMechE Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2012; 226: 2077–2092.
ChengC. Enhancing safety of actively-steered articulated vehicles. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, 2009.
33.
MillerJ. Advanced braking systems for heavy vehicles. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, 2010.
34.
UNECE. Regulation No. 13. Addendum 12, Revision 7, Amendment 3 Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles of categories M, N and O with regard to braking. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva, Switzerland, 2012.
HuntSWOdhamsAMCRoebuckRLCebonD. Parameter measurement for heavy-vehicle fuel consumption modelling. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2011; 225(5): 567–589.
37.
BowmanD. Assessment of ‘R’ ratio on SLWG surface. Report, MIRA, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, UK, 2013.
38.
BevlyDMParkinsonB. Cascaded Kalman filters for accurate estimation of multiple biases, dead-reckoning navigation, and full state feedback control of ground vehicles. IEEE Trans Control Systems Technol2007; 15: 199–208.
MorrisonG. Combined steering and braking control of articulated heavy goods vehicles. PhD First-Year Report, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, 2013.
