When a charge is ignited at the bottom of a vehicle, the underbody and the occupants are the most vulnerable. The protection of the vehicle underbody is still a significant problem in the environment of a buried-mine blast impulse. The first part of this study presents an algorithm that can be used to simulate a shallow-buried-mine blast. Models using the multiple-material arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian algorithm and the initial-impulse mine algorithm respectively were constructed on the basis of experiments carried out by Anderson et al. The accuracy and superiority of the initial-impulse mine algorithm were proved by comparing the results for the jump velocity and the computation time. The second part introduces a blast experiment on a full-scale armoured vehicle. The occupant was represented by a Hybrid III 50th-percentile adult-male dummy. A numerical model was established using the initial-impulse mine method; the seat position represented the worst-case situation, which was same as for the experiments. A comparison of the experimental data and the simulation results, which include the peak acceleration of the floor and the force to which the dummy’s tibia is subjected, showed good agreement.
RamasamyaAHillAMMasourosSD. Evaluating the effect of vehicle modification in reducing injuries from landmine blasts. An analysis of 2212 incidents and its application for humanitarian purposes. Accid Analysis Prev2011; 43: 1878–1886.
2.
BirdR. Protection of vehicles against landmines. J Battlefield Technol2001; 4: 7–14.
3.
YokohamaHSundeJEllis-SteinbornerST. Vehicle borne improvised explosive device (VBIED) characterisation and estimation of its effects in terms of human injury. Int J Prot Structs2015; 6(4): 607–627.
4.
GrujicicMBellWC. A computational analysis of survivability of a pick-up truck subjected to mine detonation loads. Multidiscipline Modeling Mater Structs2011; 7(4): 386–423.
5.
GrujicicMPanduranganBHaqueI. Computational analysis of mine blast on a commercial vehicle structure. Multidiscipline Modeling Mater Structs2007; 3(4): 431–460.
6.
GrujicicMMarviHArakereG. The effect of up-armoring of the high-mobility multi-purpose wheeled vehicle (HMMWV) on the off-road vehicle performance. Multidiscipline Modeling Mater Structs2010; 6(2): 229–256.
7.
SevaganGZhuFJiangBYangKH. Numerical simulations of the occupant head response in an infantry vehicle under blunt impact and blast loading conditions. Proc IMechE Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2013; 227(7): 778–787.
8.
BaranowskiPMalachowskiJ. Numerical study of selected military vehicle chassis subjected to blast loading in terms of tire strength improving. Bull Pol Acad Sci Tech Sci2015; 63(4): 867–878.
9.
ThotaJO’TooleBJTrabiaMB. Optimization of shock response within a military vehicle space frame. Struct Multidisciplinary Optimization2011; 44: 847–861.
10.
HoffensonSArepallySPapalambrosPY. A multi-objective optimization framework for assessing military ground vehicle design for safety. J Defense Modeling Simulation: Applic, Methodology, Technol2014; 11(1): 33–46.
11.
ErdikAKilicSAKilicNBedirS. Numerical simulation of armored vehicles subjected to undercarriage landmine blasts. Shock waves2015; 1–16.
12.
SchwerL. A brief introduction to coupling load blast enhanced with multi-material ALE: the best of both worlds for air blast simulation, In: 9th German LS-DYNA Forum on blast/penetration, Bamberg, Germany, 12–13 October 2010, pp. J-I-1–J-I-12. Stuttgart: DYNAlook, DYNAmore.
13.
GuoQZhouYWangX. Numerical simulations and experimental analysis of a vehicle cabin and its occupants subjected to a mine blast. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2016; 230(5): 623–631.
14.
FoxDMHuangXJungD. The response of small scale rigid targets to shallow buried explosive detonations. Int J Impact Engng2011; 38(11): 882–891.
15.
PickeringEGYuenSCKNurickGN. The influence of the height of burial of buried charges – some experimental observations. Int J Impact Engng2013; 58: 76–83.
16.
PickeringEGYuenSCKNurickGN. The response of quadrangular plates to buried charges. Int J Impact Engng2012; 49: 103–114.
AndersonCEJrBehnerTWeissCE. Mine blast loading: experiments and simulations. Report, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, USA, April2010.
20.
JohnsonTEBasudharA. A metamodel-based shape optimization approach for shallow-buried blast-loaded flexible underbody targets. Int J Impact Engng2015; 75: 229–240.
21.
GrujicicMArakereGNallagatlaH. Computational investigation of blast survivability and off-road performance of an up-armored high-mobility multi-purpose wheeled vehicle. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2009; 223(3): 301–325.
22.
GrujicicMArakereGBellWCHaqueI. Computational investigation of the effect of up-armouring on the reduction in occupant injury or fatality in a prototypical high-mobility multi-purpose wheeled vehicle subjected to mine blast. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2009; 223(7): 903–920.
23.
GrujicicMBellWCArakereGHaqueI. Finite element analysis of the effect of up-armouring on the off-road braking and sharp-turn performance of a high-mobility multi-purpose wheeled vehicle. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2009; 223(11): 1419–1434.
24.
ThotaJO’TooleBJTrabiaMB. Optimization of the shock mitigation layer in the space frame joints of an armored vehicle. In: ASME 2013 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Portland, Oregon, USA, 4–7 August 2013, paper DETC2013-13304. New York: ASME.
25.
ThotaJO’TooleBJTrabiaMB. Optimization of shock response within a military vehicle space frame. Struct Multidisciplinary Optimization2011; 44(6): 847–861.
26.
SchwerLSlavikT. Buried charge engineering model: verification and validation. In: 9th European LS-DYNA conference, Manchester, UK, 2–4 June 2013. Stuttgart: DYNAlook, DYNAmore, p. 23.
27.
WestinePSMorrisBLCoxPA. Development of computer program for floor plate response from land mine explosions. Technical Report 13045, US Army Tank-Automotive Command, Warren, Michigan, USA, 1985.
28.
TremblayJE. Impulse on blast deflectors from a landmine explosion. Technical Report DREV-TM-9814, Centre de Recherches pour la Défense, Valcartier, Québec, Canada, September1998.
29.
LuYWangZChongK. A comparative study of buried structure in soil subjected to blast load using 2D and 3D numerical simulations. Soil Dynamics Earthquake Engng2005; 25: 275–288.
30.
BarnatW. Experimental and numerical study of influence of incidence angle of shock wave created by explosive charge on the steel plate. Bull Pol Acad Sci Tech Sci2014; 62(1): 23–33.
31.
LeeEFingerMCollinsW. JWL equation of state coefficients for high explosives. Report UCID-16189, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA, 1973.
32.
FeldgunVRKarinskiYSYankelevskyDZ. Blast pressure distribution on a buried obstacle in a porous wet soil. Int J Prot Structs2011; 2: 45–69.
33.
FeldgunaVRKochetkovbAVKarinskiYS. Blast response of a lined cavity in a porous saturated soil. Int J Impact Engng2008; 35: 953–966.
34.
GrujicicaMPanduranganaBQiaoR. Parameterization of the porous-material model for sand with different levels of water saturation. Soil Dynamics Earthquake Engng2008; 28: 20–35.
35.
Procedures for evaluating the protection level of logistic and light armored vehicles, AEP-55, Vol 2, Mine threat. Brussels: Allied Engineering Publication, NATO, 2011.
