Vehicle crash optimization is a representative non-linear dynamic response structural optimization that utilizes highly non-linear vehicle crash analysis in the time domain. In the automobile industries, crash optimization is employed to enhance the crashworthiness characteristics. The equivalent-static-loads method has been developed for such non-linear dynamic response structural optimization. The equivalent static loads are the static loads that generate the same displacement field in linear static analysis as those of non-linear dynamic analysis at a certain time step, and the equivalent static loads are imposed as external loads in linear static structural optimization. In this research, the conventional equivalent-static-loads method is expanded to the crash management system with regard to the frontal-impact test and a full-scale vehicle for a side-impact crash test. Crash analysis frequently considers unsupported systems which do not have boundary conditions and where adjacent structures do not penetrate owing to contact. Since the equivalent-static-loads method uses linear static response structural optimization, boundary conditions are required, and the impenetrability condition cannot be directly considered. To overcome the difficulties, a problem without boundary conditions is solved by using the inertia relief method. Thus, relative displacements with respect to a certain reference point are used in linear static response optimization. The impenetrability condition in non-linear analysis is transformed to the impenetrability constraints in linear static response optimization.
MarzouguiDSamahaRRCuiC. Extended validation of the finite element model for the 2010 Toyota Yaris passenger sedan. Report, National Crash Analysis Center, George Washington UNiversity, Washington, DC, USA, July2012.
2.
ParkGJ.Technical overview of the equivalent static loads method for non-linear static response structural optimization. Struct Multidisciplinary Optimization2011; 43: 319–337.
3.
ParkGJ.Analytic methods for design practice. Germany: Springer, 2007.
4.
YangRWangNThoC. Metamodeling development for vehicle frontal impact simulation. Trans ASME, J Mech Des2005; 127: 1014–1020.
5.
JangHHLeeYParkGJ.Optimization of the loading path for the tube-hydroforming process. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2016: 230(12):1605–1623.
6.
JeongSBYiSIKanCD. Structural optimization of an automobile roof structure using equivalent static loads. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2008; 222(11): 1985–1995.
7.
JeongSBYoonSXuSParkGJ.Non-linear dynamic response structural optimization of an automobile frontal structure using equivalent static loads. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2010; 224(4): 489–501.
LeeHAParkGJ.Topology optimization for structures with nonlinear behavior using the equivalent static loads method. Trans ASME, J Mech Des2012; 134: 031004.
10.
YiSILeeHAParkGJ.Optimization of a structure with contact conditions using equivalent loads. J Mech Sci Technol2011; 25: 773–782.
11.
YiSILeeJYParkGJ.Crashworthiness design optimization using equivalent static loads. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2012; 226(1): 23–38.
12.
ChoiWSParkGJ.Transformation of dynamic loads into equivalent static loads based on modal analysis. Int J Numer Meth Engng1999; 46: 29–43.
13.
LiaoL. A study of inertia relief analysis. In: 52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Denver, Colorado, USA, 4–7 April 2011, AIAA paper 2011-2002, pp. 1–10. Reston, Virginia: AIAA.
14.
NASTRAN user’s guide. Newport Beach, California: MSC Software, 2013.
15.
Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, Title 49 – transportation, Subtitle B – other regulations relating to transportation, Chapter V, Part 581– bumper standard, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Department of Transport, Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
16.
Side impact crashworthiness evaluation crash test protocol (version VII). Document, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Ruckersville, Virginia, USA, 2014.
CardosoJAroraJ.Variational method for design sensitivity analysis in nonlinear structural mechanics. AIAA J1988; 26: 595–603.
19.
ChoiKKKimNH.Structural sensitivity analysis and optimization 2: nonlinear systems and applications. Berlin: Springer, 2005.
20.
MauteKNikbayMFarhatC.Coupled analytical sensitivity analysis and optimization of three-dimensional nonlinear aeroelastic systems. AIAA J2001; 39: 2051–2061.
21.
NakshatralaPTortorelliD.Topology optimization for effective energy propagation in rate-independent elastoplastic material systems. Comput Meth Appl Mech Engng2015; 295: 305–326.
22.
NakshatralaPTortorelliDNakshatralaK.Nonlinear structural design using multiscale topology optimization. Part I: static formulation. Comput Meth Appl Mech Engng2013; 261: 167–176.
23.
JamesKAWaismanH.Topology optimization of viscoelastic structures using a time-dependent adjoint method. Comput Meth Appl Mech Engng2015; 285: 166–187.
24.
BaragettiSVillaF.A dynamic optimization theoretical method for heavy loaded vibrating screens. Nonlinear Dynamics2014; 78: 609–627.
25.
YunYWChoiJSParkGJ.Optimization of an automobile curtain airbag using the design of experiments. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2014; 228(4): 370–380.
26.
ParkJKimKLeeJYoonJ.Light-weight design of automotive suspension link based on design of experiment. Int J Automot Technol2015; 16: 67–71.
27.
WangC-QWangD-FZhangS.Design and application of lightweight multi-objective collaborative optimization for a parametric body-in-white structure. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2016; 230(2): 273–288.
28.
TeyJYRamliRAbdullahAS.A new multi-objective optimization method for full-vehicle suspension systems. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2016: 230(11):1443–1458.
29.
LimJHParkJSYunYW. Design of an airbag system of a mid-sized automobile for pedestrian protection. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2015; 229(5): 656–669.
30.
GongXGuZLiZ.Surrogate model for aerodynamic shape optimization of a tractor–trailer in crosswinds. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2012; 226(10): 1225–1339.
31.
FangHRais-RohaniMLiuZHorstemeyerM.A comparative study of metamodeling methods for multiobjective crashworthiness optimization. Comput Structs2005; 83: 2121–2136.
32.
KimYIParkGJKolonayR. Nonlinear dynamic response structural optimization of a joined-wing using equivalent static loads. J Aircr2009; 46: 821–831.
33.
WitowskiKMullerschonHErhartA. Topology and topometry optimization of crash applications with equivalent static load method. In: 13th international LS-DYNA users conference, Dearborn, Michigan, CA, USA, 8–10 June 2014, Paper No. 125. Livermore Software Technology Corporation.
34.
KangBSParkGJAroraJS.Optimization of flexible multibody dynamic systems using the equivalent static load method. AIAA J2005; 43: 846–852.
35.
LeeJJParkGJ.Optimization of the structural and process parameters in the sheet metal forming process. J Mech Sci Technol2014; 28: 605–619.
36.
ShinMKParkKJParkGJ.Optimization of structures with nonlinear behavior using equivalent loads. Comput Meth Appl Mech Engng2007; 196: 1154–1167.
37.
KimYParkGKolonayR. Nonlinear response structural optimization of a joined wing using equivalent loads. AIAA J2008; 46: 2703–2713.
38.
KimEKimH-GBaekSChoM.Effective structural optimization based on equivalent static loads combined with system reduction method. Struct Multidisciplinary Optimization2014; 50: 775–786.
39.
AdduriPLeivaJPQuinnGWatsonBC.Car body optimization considering crashworthiness NVH and static responses. In: 13th international LS-DYNA users conference, Dearborn, Michigan, CA, USA, 8–10 June 2014, Paper No.: 97. Livermore Software Technology Corporation.
YangZChenXKellyR.A topological optimization approach for structural design of a high-speed low-load mechanism using the equivalent static loads method. Int J Numer Meth Engng2012; 89: 584–598.
42.
ChenXBaiYYangZ. A precision-positioning method for a high-acceleration low-load mechanism based on optimal spatial and temporal distribution of inertial energy. Engineering2015; 1: 391–398.
43.
HongEYouBKimCParkG.Optimization of flexible components of multibody systems via equivalent static loads. Struct Multidisciplinary Optimization2010; 40: 549–562.
44.
AkbariJSadoughiA.Shape optimization of structures under earthquake loadings. Struct Multidisciplinary Optimization2013; 47: 855–866.
45.
LeeHAParkGJ.Nonlinear dynamic response topology optimization using the equivalent static loads method. Comput Meth Appl Mech Engng2015; 283: 956–970.
46.
VautierITardieuNTaheriQ.A master–slave large slip contact algorithm coupled to an active set method: application to the modelling of indentation. In: IdelsohnSOñateEDvorkinE (eds) Computational mechanics: new trends and applications. Barcelona: CIMNE, 1998, pp. 1–18.
47.
JosuttisNM.The C++ standard library: a tutorial and reference. Boston, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 2012.
48.
Fatality analysis reporting system. Report, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
49.
ArbelaezRABakerBCNolanJM. Delta Vs for IIHS side impact crash tests and their relationship to real-world crash severity. In: 19th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, Washington, DC, USA, 6–9 June 2005, paper 05-0049. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation.
50.
The National Crash Analysis Center, George Washington University. Finite element model archive, http://www.ncac.gwu.edu/vml/models.html (2014, accessed 1 February 2014).
