Electric vehicles are becoming more popular in the market. To be competitive, manufacturers need to produce vehicles with a low energy consumption, a good range and an acceptable driving performance. These are dependent on the choice of components and the topology in which they are used. In a conventional gasoline vehicle, the powertrain topology is constrained to a few well-understood layouts; these typically consist of a single engine driving one axle or both axles through a multi-ratio gearbox. With electric vehicles, there is more flexibility, and the design space is relatively unexplored. In this paper, we evaluate several different topologies as follows: a traditional topology using a single electric motor driving a single axle with a fixed gear ratio; a topology using separate motors for the front axle and the rear axle, each with its own fixed gear ratio; a topology using in-wheel motors on a single axle; a four-wheel-drive topology using in-wheel motors on both axes. Multi-objective optimisation techniques are used to find the optimal component sizing for a given requirement set and to investigate the trade-offs between the energy consumption, the powertrain cost and the acceleration performance. The paper concludes with a discussion of the relative merits of the different topologies and their applicability to real-world passenger cars.
GuzzellaLSciarrettaA.Vehicle propulsion systems: introduction to modeling and optimization. Berlin: Springer, 2005.
4.
DextreitCAssadianFKolmanovskyV. Hybrid electric vehicle energy management using game theory. SAE paper 2008-01-1317, 2008.
5.
DextreitCKolmanovskyV.Game theory controller for hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Control Systems Technol2014; 22(2): 652–663.
6.
WeissingerCBuecherlDHerzogH. Conceptual design of a pure electric vehicle. In: 2010 IEEE vehicle power and propulsion conference, Lille, France, 1–3 September 2010, pp. 1–5. New York: IEEE.
7.
HayesJGOliveriaRPRVaughanSEganMG.Simplified electric vehicle power train models and range estimation. In: 2011 IEEE vehicle power and propulsion conference, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 6–9 September 2011, pp. 1–5. New York: IEEE.
8.
PearreNSKemptonWGuenslerRLElangoV.Electric vehicles: how much range is required for a day’s driving?Transpn Res Part C: Emerging Technol2011; 19(6): 1171–1184.
9.
EhsaniMGaoYEmadiA.Modern electric, hybrid electric, and fuel cell vehicles: fundamentals, theory, and design. 2nd edition.Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 2009, p. 557.
10.
GuironZHenghaiZHouyuL.The driving control of pure electric vehicle. Procedia Environ Sci2011; 10(A): 433–438.
11.
WangRChenYFengD. Development and performance characterization of an electric ground vehicle with independently actuated in-wheel motors. J Power Sources2011; 196(8): 3962–3971.
van SchalkwykDJKamperMJ. Effect of hub motor mass on stability and comfort of electric vehicles. In: 2006 IEEE vehicle power and propulsion conference, Windsor, Ontario, Canada, 6–8 September 2006, pp. 1–6. New York: IEEE.
14.
JainMWilliamsonSS. Suitability analysis of in-wheel motor direct drives for electric and hybrid electric vehicles. In: 2009 IEEE electrical power and energy conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 22–23 October 2009, pp. 1–5. New York: IEEE.
15.
YanXPattersonD. Improvement of drive range, acceleration and deceleration performance in an electric vehicle propulsion system. In: 30th annual IEEE power electronics specialists conference, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, 1 July 1999, Vol 2, pp. 638–643. New York: IEEE.
16.
BenysekGJarnutM.Electric vehicle charging infrastructure in Poland. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2012; 16(1): 320–328.
17.
ZhouBJiangQYangYWangJ. Analysis of energy consumption and powertrain parameters optimization of BEV based on running cycle. In: 2010 IEEE 11th international conference on computer-aided industrial design and conceptual design, Yiwu, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China, 17–19 November 2010, pp. 1284–1290. New York: IEEE.
18.
HuXMurgovskiNJohannessonLMEgardtB.Optimal dimensioning and power management of a fuel cell/battery hybrid bus via convex programming. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics2016; 20(1): 457–468.
19.
OthaganontPAssadianFAugerD.Sensitivity analyses for cross-coupled parameters in automotive powertrain optimization. Energies2014; 7(6): 3733–3747.
20.
WipkeKBCuddyMRBurchSD.ADVISOR 2.1: a user-friendly advanced powertrain simulation using a combined backward/forward approach. IEEE Trans Veh Technol1999; 48(6): 1751–1761.
21.
MohanGAssadianFLongoS. Comparative analysis of forward-facing models vs backward-facing models in powertrain component sizing. In: 2013 4th IET hybrid and electric vehicles conference, London, UK, 6–7 November 2013, pp. 1–6. New York: IEEE.
22.
YangYHuXPeiHPengZ.Comparison of power-split and parallel hybrid powertrain architectures with a single electric machine: dynamic programming approach. Appl Energy2016; 168: 683–690.
23.
MohanGAssadianFLongoS.An optimization framework for comparative analysis of multiple vehicle powertrains. Energies2013; 6: 5507–5537.
24.
LeitmanSBrantB.Build your own electric vehicle. 2nd edition.New York: McGraw-Hill, 2009.
25.
LarminieJLowryJ.Electric vehicle technology explained. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley, 2004.
26.
ChenGHTsengKJ. Design of a permanent-magnet direct-driven wheel motor drive for electric vehicle. In: 27th annual IEEE power electronics specialists conference, Baveno, Italy, 23–27 June 1996, Vol 2, pp. 1933–1939. New York: IEEE.
27.
QianHXuGYanQ. Energy management for four-wheel independent driving vehicle. In: 2010 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Taipei, Republic of China, 18–22 October 2010, pp. 5532–5537. New York: IEEE.
CaricchiFCrescimbiniFDi NapoliAMarcheggianiM. Prototype of electric vehicle drive with twin water-cooled wheel direct drive motors. In: 27th annual IEEE power electronics specialists conference, Baveno, Italy, 23–27 June 1996, Vol 2, pp. 1926–1932. New York: IEEE.
30.
QianHLamTLLiW. System and design of an omni-directional vehicle. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics, Bangkok, Thailand, 21–26 February 2008, pp. 389–394. New York: IEEE.
31.
RahmanKMPatelNRWardTG. Application of direct-drive wheel motor for fuel cell electric and hybrid electric vehicle propulsion system. IEEE Trans Ind Applic2006; 42(5): 1185–1192.
32.
TaoGMaZZhouLLiL. A novel driving and control system for direct-wheel-driven electric vehicle. In: 2004 12th symposium on electromagnetic launch technology, Snowbird, Utah, USA, 25–28 May 2004, pp. 514–517. New York: IEEE.
33.
YangY-PHuT-H. A new energy management system of directly-driven electric vehicle with electronic gearshift and regenerative braking. In: 2007 American control conference, New York, USA, 9–13 July 2007, pp. 4419–4424. New York: IEEE.
34.
TieSFTanCW.A review of energy sources and energy management system in electric vehicles. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2013; 20: 82–102.
35.
DejunYHoriY. A novel traction control of EV based on maximum effective torque. In: IEEE 2008 vehicle power and propulsion conference, Harbin, Heilongjiang, People’s Republic of China, 3–5 September 2008, pp. 1–6. New York: IEEE.
36.
HoriY.Future vehicle driven by electricity and control-research on four wheel motored “UOT Electric March II”. In: 2002 7th international workshop on advanced motion control, Maribor, Slovenia, 3–5 July 2002, pp. 1–14. New York: IEEE.
37.
SakaiSSadoHHoriY.Motion control in an electric vehicle with four independently driven in-wheel motors. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics1999; 4(1): 9–16.
38.
WangJWangQJinLSongC.Independent wheel torque control of 4WD electric vehicle for differential drive assisted steering. Mechatronics2011; 21(1): 63–76.
39.
SorniottiABoscoloMTurnerACavallinoC. Optimization of a multi-speed electric axle as a function of the electric motor properties. In: 2010 IEEE vehicle power and propulsion conference, Lille, France, 1–3 September 2010, pp. 1–6. New York: IEEE.
40.
LukicSMEmadoA. Modeling of electric machines for automotive applications using efficiency maps. In: Electrical insulation conference and electrical manufacturing coil winding technology conference, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, 23–25 September 2003, pp. 543–550. New York: IEEE.
41.
SatoYIshikawaSOkuboT. Development of high response motor and inverter system for the Nissan LEAF electric vehicle. SAE paper 2011-01-0350, 2011.
SimpsonA. Cost–benefit analysis of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle technology. In: 22nd international battery, hybrid and fuel cell electric vehicle symposium and exhibition, Yokohama, Japan, 22–28 October 2006, paper NREL/CP-540-40485. Golden, Colorado: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
The MathWorks, Inc. Global Optimization Toolbox R2014a user’s guide. Natick, Massachusetts The MathWorks, Inc., 2014, section 5.3.
47.
OthaganontPAssadianFMarcoJ. Battery electric vehicle powertrain simulation to optimise range and performance’. In: International conference on powertrain modelling and control, Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK, 4–6 September 2012. The University of Bradford School of Engineering, Design and Technology.
