An investigation into the influence of the ground clearance on the aerodynamic interactions between the inverted front wing and the wheel of a racing car was conducted using computational fluid dynamics. Height-to-chord ratios h/c from 0.075 to 0.27 were assessed for a single-element wing with a fixed angle of 4° and for two wing spans, one of which completely overlapped the wheel and the other which had its endplate coincident with the inside face of the wheel. With a narrower span, a lower peak downforce was achieved at a higher ground clearance owing to changes in the lower endplate vortex strength whereas, with a wider span, no downforce loss was observed, with decreasing clearance for those tested. This contrasted distinctly with the performance of the wing in isolation. The wheel lift was scarcely affected with decreasing wing ground clearance for the narrower span but decreased significantly for the wide-span wing at low ground clearances. The vortex paths changed considerably with the ground clearance, with a strong coupling to the wing span; a state in which the main vortex was destroyed in the contact patch of the wheel was identified.
DominyRG. Aerodynamics of Grand Prix cars. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering1992; 206(4): 267–274.
2.
AgathangelouBGascoyneM. Aerodynamic considerations of a Formula One racing car. SAE paper 980399, 1998.
3.
KatzJ. Aerodynamics of race cars. A Rev Fluid Mech2006; 38: 27–63.
4.
ZhangXToetWZerihanJ. Ground effect aerodynamics of racing cars. Appl Mech Rev2006; 59(1): 33–49.
5.
BarberT JDoigGBevesC. The synergistic integration of CFD and EFD for ground effect aerodynamics studies. Proc. IMechE Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2012; 226(6): 602–619.
6.
CorreiaJRobertsLSFinnisMVKnowlesK. Scale effects on a single-element inverted wing in ground effect. Aeronaut J2014; 118(1205): 797–809.
7.
ZhangXZerihanJ. Off-surface aerodynamic measurements of a wing in ground effect. J Aircr2003; 40(4): 716–725.
8.
DiasinosSBarberTJDoigG. Influence of wing span on the aerodynamics of wings in ground effect. Proc. IMechE Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2013; 227(3): 564–568.
9.
DoigGBarberTJLeonardiENeelyAJ. The onset of compressibility effects for an inverted aerofoil in ground effect. Aeronaut J2007; 111(1126): 797–806.
10.
DoigGBarberTJLeonardiENeelyA J. The onset of compressibility effects for an inverted aerofoil in ground effect. Aeronaut J2007; 111(1126): 797–806.
11.
DoigGBarberTJ. Considerations for numerical modeling of inverted wings in ground effect. AIAA J2011; 49(10): 2330–2333.
12.
KeoghJDoigGBarberTJDiasinosS. The aerodynamics of a cornering inverted wing in ground effect. Appl Mech Mater2014; 553: 205–210.
13.
KeoghJDoigGDiasinosSBarberTJ. The influence of cornering on the vortical wake structures of an inverted wing. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2015; 229(13): 1817–1829.
14.
RanzenbachRBarlowJDiazR. Multi-element aerofoil in ground effect – an experimental and computational study. In: 15th applied aerodynamics conference, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 23–25 June 1997, AIAA paper 97-2238. Reston, Virginia: AIAA.
15.
ZerihanJZhangX. Aerodynamics of a single element wing in ground effect. J Aircr2000; 37(6): 1058–1064.
16.
ZerihanJZhangX. Aerodynamics of Gurney flaps on a wing in ground effect. AIAA J2001; 39(5): 772–780.
17.
ZhangXZerihanJ. Edge vortices of a double element wing in ground effect. J Aircr2004; 41(5): 1127–1137.
18.
Axerio-CiliesJIssakhanianEJimenezJIaccarinoG. An aerodynamic investigation of an isolated stationary Formula 1 wheel assembly. J Fluids Engng2012; 134(2): 021101-1–021101-17.
19.
IssakhanianEElkinsCJLoKPEatonJK. An experimental study of the flow around a Formula One racing car tire. J Fluids Engng2010; 132(7): 071103-1–071103-8.
20.
McManusJZhangX. A computational study of the flow around an isolated wheel in contact with the ground. J Fluids Engng, 2006; 128(3): 520–530.
21.
SaddingtonAJKnowlesRDKnowlesK. Laser Doppler anemometry measurements in the near-wake of an isolated Formula One wheel. Exp Fluids2007; 42(5): 671–681.
22.
KnowlesKDonoghueDTFinnisMV. A study of wings in ground effect. In: Royal Aeronautical Society conference on vehicle aerodynamics, Loughborough, UK, 18 July 1994, pp. 22.1–22.13. London: Royal Aeronautical Society.
23.
DiasinosSGattoA. Experimental investigation into wing span and angle-of-attack effects on sub-scale race car wing/wheel interaction aerodynamics. Exp Fluids2008; 45(3): 537–546.
24.
DiasinosS. The aerodynamic interaction of a rotating wheel and a downforce producing wing in ground effect. PhD Thesis, School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia, 2009.
25.
KnowlesRDSaddingtonAJKnowlesK. On the near wake of a Formula One front wheel. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2013; 227(11): 1491–1502.
26.
Van Den BergMAZhangX. The aerodynamic interaction between an inverted wing and a rotating wheel. J Fluids Engng2009; 131(10): 101104-1–101104-13.
27.
DiasinosSDoigGBarberTJ, On the interaction of a racing car front wing and exposed wheel. Aeronaut J2014; 118(1210): 1385–1407.
28.
PegrumJ M. Experimental study of the vortex system generated by a Formula 1 front wing. Doctoral Dissertation, Imperial College London, University of London, London, UK, 2006.
29.
CruickshankMDoigG. Application of kriging to motorsport aerodynamic analysis. Appl Mech Mater2014; 553: 217–222.
30.
KeoghJDoigGDiasinosS. Flow compressibility effects around an open-wheel racing car. Aeronaut J2014; 118(1210): 1409–1431.
31.
KeoghJDoigGDiasinosS. The influence of compressibility effects in correlation issues for aerodynamic development of racing cars. In: 18th Australasian fluid mechanics conference, Lauceston, Australia, 3–7 December 2012, pp. 1–4. Melbourne, Victoria: Australasian Fluid Mechanics Society.
VeersteegHKMalalasekeraV. Computational fluid dynamics. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1998.
34.
DiasinosSBarberTJDoigG. The effects of simplifications on isolated wheel aerodynamics. J Wind Engng Ind Aerodynamics. 2015; 146: 90–101.
35.
WilcoxDC. Turbulence modelling for CFD. La Cañada Flintridge, California: DCW Industries Inc., 2000.
36.
AIAA G-077-1998Guide for the verification and validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations. Reston, Virginia: AIAA,1998.
37.
FackrellJE. The aerodynamics of an isolated wheel rotating in contact with the ground. Doctoral Dissertation, Imperial College London, University of London, London, UK, 1974.
