Filters are used to decontaminate the particles from the outside environment entering different subsystems of vehicles. Conventional air filters can cause a significant pressure drop in the intake air system because of their porous structure. In this study, a cyclone separator was designed and manufactured for the air intake system of an automobile. The pressure drop and the performance parameters of the engine were measured by using a conventional air filter or a cyclone separator in the air intake system. Futhermore, a computational fluid dynamics analysis of the cyclone separator was performed, and the results were compared with the experimental data.
AlexanderRM. Fundamentals of cyclone design and operation. Proc Aust Inst Miner Metall1949; 152: 203–228.
2.
BarthW. Berechnung und auslegung von zyklonabscheidern auf grund neuerer untersuchungen. Brennstoff-Waärme-Kraft1956; 8(1): 1–9.
3.
BarthWLeineweberL. Evaluation of design of cyclone separators. Staub Reinhaltung Luft1964; 24: 41–55.
4.
ShepherdGBLappleCE. Flow pattern and pressure drop in cyclone dust collectors. Ind Engng Chem1939; 31(8): 972–984.
5.
AvciAKaragozI. Effect of flow and geometrical parameters on the collection efficiency in cyclone separators. J Aerosol Sci2003; 34: 937–955.
6.
KaragozIAvciA. Modelling of the pressure drop in tangential inlet cyclone separators. Aerosol Sci Technol2005; 39: 857–865.
7.
KimJCLeeKW. Experimental study of particle collection by small cyclones. Aerosol Sci Technol1990; 12: 1003–1015.
8.
MooreMEMcFarlandAF. Performance modeling of single-inlet aerosol sampling cyclones. Environ Sci Technol1993; 27: 1842–1848.
9.
XiangRParkSHLeeKW. Effects of cone dimension on cyclone performance. J Aerosol Sci2001; 32(4): 549–561.
10.
ZhuYLeeKW. Experimental study on small cyclones operating at high flowrates. J Aerosol Sci1999; 30(10): 1303–1315.
11.
DerksenJJVan den AkkerHEASundaresanS. Two-way coupled large-eddy simulations of the gas–solid flow in cyclone separators. AIChE J2008; 54(4): 872–885.
12.
ElsayedKLacorC. Optimization of the cyclone separator geometry for minimum pressure drop using mathematical models and CFD simulations. Chem Engng Sci2010; 65(22): 6048–6058.
13.
ElsayedKLacorC. Modeling, analysis and optimization of aircyclones using artificial neural network, response surface methodology and CFD simulation approaches. Powder Technol2011; 212(1): 115–133.
14.
ElsayedKLacorC. Numerical modeling of the flow field and performance in cyclones of different cone-tip diameters. Comput Fluids2011; 51(1): 48–59.
15.
HoekstraAJDerksenJJVan Den AkkerHEA. An experimental and numerical study turbulent swirling flow in gas cyclones. Chem Engng Sci1999; 54: 2055–2065.
16.
InghamDBMaL. Predicting the performance of air cyclones. Int J Engng Res2002; 26: 633–652.
17.
KaragozIKayaF. CFD investigation of the flow and heat transfer characteristics in a tangential inlet cyclone. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer2007; 34: 1119–1126.
18.
KayaFKaragozI. Performance analysis of numerical schemes in swirling turbulent flows in cyclones. Curr Sci2008; 94: 1273–1278.
19.
ShuklaSKShuklaPGhoshP. Evaluation of numerical schemes using different simulation methods for the continuous phase modeling of cyclone separators. Adv Powder Technol2010; 22(2): 209–19.
20.
HineitiNGuessousL. Numerical investigation of transient flow effects on the separation parameters of a reverse flow type cyclone particle separator. SAE paper 2008-01-0419, 2008.
21.
AkhterMNabiM. Design, construction and performance testing of a cyclonic separator to control particulate pollution from diesel engine exhaust. SAE paper 2005-01-3695, 2005.
22.
MukhopadhyayNChakrabartiRBoseP. A new theoretical approach of designing cyclone separator for controlling diesel soot particulate emission. SAE paper 2006-01-1978, 2006.
23.
KaragozIKayaFAvciA. Usability of cyclone separators as air filters in vehicles. Int J Vehicle Des2010; 52(1/2/3/4): 133–143.
24.
AzimAFAEl-SalmawyHAShamioulMMMesalhyOM. Prediction of engine intake filter performance and its impact on engine erosion in Cairo City. In: 7th international congress on fluid dynamics and propulsion, Cairo, Egypt, 18–20 December 2001, paper ICFDP7-2001020, pp. 1–8. New York: ASME.
25.
StaleyD. Correlating lube oil filtration efficiencies with engine wear. SAE paper 881825, 1988.
26.
ISO 5011:2014Inlet air cleaning equipment for internal combustion engines and compressors – performance testing. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
27.
ISO 12103-1:2016Road vehicles – Test contaminants for filter evaluation – Part 1: Arizona test dust. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
28.
MamatRAbdullahNRXuHet al. Effect of air intake pressure drop on performance and emissions of a diesel engine operating with biodiesel and ultra low sulphur diesel (ULSD). In: International conference on renewable energies and power quality, Valencia, Spain, 15–17 April 2009, pp. 787–794. European Association for the Development of Renewable Energies, Environment and Power Quality.
29.
StairmandCJ. The design and performance of modern gas cleaning equipment. J Inst Fuel1952; 29: 58–76.
30.
DirgoJLeithD. Cyclone collection efficiency: comparison of experimental results with theoretical predictions. Aerosol Sci Technol1985; 4: 401–415.
31.
SakinAKaragozI. Numerıcal investigation of surface roughness effects on the flow field in a swirl flow. Uludag Univ J Fac Engng2014; 19(2): 1–18.
