Electric vehicles (EVs) are an alternative architecture in the automotive industry that provide reduced emissions. This research has developed a switch reluctance motor (SRM) in-wheel drivetrain for an EV. SRM drivetrains are cheaper and do not use rare earth elements unlike a permanent magnet motor (PMM). Conversely, the in-wheel SRM has a drawback of an increased mass on the suspension when compared with an equivalent power output PMM drivetrain. This situation results in an increased mass at the wheels; hence, a suspension analysis is required. This paper discusses the suspension dynamics evaluated using a quarter-car simulation of an in-wheel SRM EV and compares it to the internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle. The simulation used step loads derived design scenarios, namely (1) sprung, (2) unsprung and (3) driver’s seat. Further Bode plot analysis techniques were used to determine the ride comfort range for the developed EV.
KulkarniARanjhaSAKapoorA. Fatigue analysis of a suspension for an in-wheel electric vehicle. Eng Fail Anal2016; 68: 150–158.
2.
LovattHCEltonDCahillLet al. Design procedure for low cost, low mass, direct drive, in-wheel motor drivetrains for electric and hybrid vehicles. In: IECON 2011 – 37th annual conference on IEEE industrial electronics society, Melbourne, VIC, 7–10 November 2011. New York: IEEE.
3.
NovellisLDSorniottiAGruberP. Design and comparison of the handling performance of different electric vehicle layouts. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2014; 228: 218–232.
4.
GeorgeADBesselinkI. Rear suspension design for an in-wheel-drive electric car. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2016; 230: 147–159.
5.
VerrosGNatsiavasSPapadimitriouC. Design optimization of quarter-car models with passive and semi-active suspensions under random road excitation. J Vib Control2005; 11: 581–606.
6.
SteinGJMúčkaP. Theoretical investigation of a linear planar model of a passenger car with seated people. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2003; 217: 257–268.
7.
FiratMKocabicakU. Analytical durability modeling and evaluation-complementary techniques for physical testing of automotive components. Eng Fail Anal2004; 11: 655–674.
8.
SohnH-CHongK-SHedrickJK. Semi-active control of the MacPherson suspension system: hardware-in-the-loop simulations. In: Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE international conference on control applications, Anchorage, AK, 27 September 2000. New York: IEEE.
9.
GeorgiouGVerrosGNatsiavasS. Multi-objective optimization of quarter-car models with a passive or semi-active suspension system. Vehicle Syst Dyn2007; 45: 77–92.
10.
MeteredHBonelloPOyadijiSO. An investigation into the use of neural networks for the semi-active control of a magnetorheologically damped vehicle suspension. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2010; 224: 829–848.
11.
GaoWZhangNDaiJ. A stochastic quarter-car model for dynamic analysis of vehicles with uncertain parameters. Vehicle Syst Dyn2008; 46: 1159–1169.
12.
ChanBJSanduC. A ray-tracing approach to simulation and evaluation of a real-time quarter car model with semi-active suspension system using MATLAB. In: 2003 ASME design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Chicago, IL, 2–6 September 2003, pp.2129–2134. New York: ASME.
13.
CaoJTLiuHHLiPet al. A study of electric vehicle suspension control system based on an improved half-vehicle model. Int J Autom Comput2007; 4: 236–242.
14.
CaoJLiuHLiPet al. State of the art in vehicle active suspension adaptive control systems based on intelligent methodologies. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2008; 9: 392–405.
HuangS-JChaoH-C. Fuzzy logic controller for a vehicle active suspension system. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2000; 214: 1–12.
17.
CaoJ-TLiPLiuH-H. An extended fuzzy controller for a vehicle active suspension system. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2010; 224: 717–733.
18.
KarnoppDCrosbyMJHarwoodRA. Vibration control using semi-active force generators. J Eng Ind1974; 96: 619–626.
19.
Poussot-VassalCSenameODugardLet al. A new semi-active suspension control strategy through LPV technique. Control Eng Pract2008; 16: 1519–1534.
20.
AgharkakliASabetGSBarouzA. Simulation and analysis of passive and active suspension system using quarter car model for different road profile. Int J Eng Trends Tech2012; 31: 636–644.
21.
ShinDLeeGYiKet al. Motorized vehicle active suspension damper control with dynamic friction and actuator delay compensation for a better ride quality. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2016; 230: 1074–1089.
22.
ZhaoWWangCZhaoTet al. Research on the multi-disciplinary design method for an integrated automotive steering and suspension system. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2015; 229: 1249–1262.
23.
KulkarniAKapoorA. Rim and tyre investigation for in-wheel motor of electric vehicle using simulations. In: 20th international congress on modelling and simulation, Adelaide, Australia, 1–6 December 2013.
24.
SavaresiSMSpeltaC. A single-sensor control strategy for semi-active suspensions. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2009; 17: 143–152.
