This paper addresses a control scheme for a parallel hybrid vehicle powertrain by introducing fueling control techniques. Since a diesel engine is involved in the proposed configuration, the control of fuel injection mass and timing becomes a crucial issue. In this study, these two variables are selected as control inputs for the hybrid powertrain system. Meanwhile, an optimization-based control strategy is designed to solve the hybrid electric vehicle power management problem by incorporating engine brake specific fuel consumption characteristics with regard to fuel injection control variables. To show the advantages of the proposed control scheme, another optimization-based strategy with fixed fuel injection timing is developed and implemented for comparison. The influence of NOx emission is also considered in control strategy and simulation results to show that the proposed fuel control technique has limited impact on NOx emission but imposes a considerable improvement on fuel saving.
GurkaynakYKhalighAEmadiA. State of the art power management algorithms for hybrid electric vehicles. In: IEEE vehicle power and propulsion conference (VPPC ’09), Dearborn, MI, 7–10 September 2009, pp.388–394. New York: IEEE.
2.
GrizzleJW.Power management strategy for a parallel hybrid electric truck. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2003; 11: 839–849.
3.
SerraoLSciarrettaAGrondinOet al. Open issues in supervisory control of hybrid electric vehicles: a unified approach using optimal control methods. Oil Gas Sci Technol2013; 68: 23–33.
4.
SalmasiFR.Control strategies for hybrid electric vehicles: evolution, classification, comparison, and future trends. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2007; 56: 2393–2404.
5.
EmadiARajashekaraKWilliamsonSSet al. Topological overview of hybrid electric and fuel cell vehicular power system architectures and configurations. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2005; 54: 763–770.
6.
ChanCCBouscayrolAChenK.Electric, hybrid, and fuel-cell vehicles: architectures and modeling. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2010; 59: 589–598.
7.
Van BerkelKHofmanTVroemenBet al. Optimal control of a mechanical hybrid powertrain. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2012; 61: 485–497.
8.
YuanZTengLFengchunSet al. Comparative study of dynamic programming and pontryagin’s minimum principle on energy management for a parallel hybrid electric vehicle. Energies2013; 6: 2305–2318.
9.
BaumannBMWashingtonGGlennBCet al. Mechatronic design and control of hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE-ASME T Mech2000; 5: 58–72.
10.
ÇaúÏatay BayindirKGözüküçükMATekeA. A comprehensive overview of hybrid electric vehicle: powertrain configurations, powertrain control techniques and electronic control units. Energy Convers Manage2011; 52: 1305–1313.
11.
GuardiolaCPlaBOnoriSet al. Insight into the HEV/PHEV optimal control solution based on a new tuning method. Control Eng Pract2014; 29: 247–252.
12.
SciarrettaAGuzzellaL.Control of hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE Control Syst2007; 27: 60–70.
13.
KermaniSDelpratSGuerraTMet al. Predictive energy management for hybrid vehicle. Control Eng Pract2012; 20: 408–420.
14.
SampathnarayananBOnoriSYurkovichS.An optimal regulation strategy with disturbance rejection for energy management of hybrid electric vehicles. Automatica2014; 50: 128–140.
15.
NüeschTElbertPFlanklMet al. Convex optimization for the energy management of hybrid electric vehicles considering engine start and gearshift costs. Energies2014; 7: 834–856.
16.
BorhanHVahidiAPhillipsAMet al. MPC-based energy management of a power-split hybrid electric vehicle. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol2012; 20: 593–603.
17.
LinCPengHGrizzleJ. A stochastic control strategy for hybrid electric vehicles. In: Proceedings of the American control conference, Boston, MA, 30 June–2 July 2004, pp.4710–4715. New York: IEEE.
18.
SciarrettaABackMGuzzellaL.Optimal control of parallel hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2004; 12: 352–363.
19.
DelpratSLauberJGuerraT-Met al. Control of a parallel hybrid powertrain: optimal control. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2004; 53: 872–881.
20.
AgarwalAKSrivastavaDKDharAet al. Effect of fuel injection timing and pressure on combustion, emissions and performance characteristics of a single cylinder diesel engine. Fuel2013; 111: 374–383.
21.
GumusMSayinCCanakciM.Effect of fuel injection timing on the injection, combustion, and performance characteristics of a direct-injection (DI) diesel engine fueled with canola oil methyl ester−diesel fuel blends. Energy Fuel2010; 24: 3199–3213.
22.
HeywoodJB.Internal combustion engine fundamentals, Vol. 21. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988.
23.
SayinCCanakciM.Effects of injection timing on the engine performance and exhaust emissions of a dual-fuel diesel engine. Energy Convers Manage2009; 50: 203–213.
24.
SahooNSahaUKSahooBB.Effect of engine parameters and type of gaseous fuel on the performance of dual-fuel gas diesel engines – a critical review. Renew Sust Energ Rev2009; 13: 1151–1184.
25.
TeinerPSchneeweissB.Evaluation of NOx and fuel consumption reduction potential of parallel diesel-hybrid powertrains using engine-in-the-loop simulation. SAE paper 2010-32-0128, 2010.
26.
GrondinOThibaultLQuérelC.Transient torque control of a diesel hybrid powertrain for NOx limitation. IFAC Proc Vol2012; 45: 286–295.
27.
KolmanovskyIvan NieuwstadtMSunJ. Optimization of complex powertrain systems for fuel economy and emissions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on control applications, Kohala Coast, HI, 22–27 August 2000, pp.833–839. New York: IEEE.
28.
KimNRousseauA.Sufficient conditions of optimal control based on Pontryagin’s minimum principle for use in hybrid electric vehicles. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Eng2012; 226: 1160–1170.
