The use of kerosene in direct injection compression ignition engines is fundamentally due to the introduction of the Single Fuel Concept. As conventional direct injection compression ignition diesel engines are made specifically to use diesel fuel, the usage of kerosene will affect engine emissions and performance due to differences between the fuel properties of kerosene and diesel. As a result, in order for kerosene to be properly and efficiently used in diesel engines, it is needful for the scientific community to know the properties of kerosene, its autoignition and combustion characteristics, as well as its emissions formation behavior under diesel engine operating conditions. Moreover, it is desirable to know the progress made in the development of suitable kerosene surrogates for engine applications as it is a crucial step toward the development of reliable chemical reaction mechanisms for numerical simulations. Therefore, in this work, a comprehensive review is carried out systematically to better understand the characteristics and behavior of kerosene under direct injection compression ignition engine relevant conditions. In this review work, the fuel properties of kerosene are summarized and discussed. In addition, fundamental autoignition studies of kerosene in shock tube, rapid compression machine, fuel ignition tester, ignition quality tester, constant volume combustion chamber, and engine are compiled and evaluated. Furthermore, experimental studies of kerosene spray and combustion in constant volume combustion chambers are examined. Also, the experimental investigations of kerosene combustion and emissions in direct injection compression ignition engines are discussed. Moreover, the development of kerosene surrogates, their chemical reaction mechanisms, and the modeling of kerosene combustion in direct injection compression ignition engines are summarized and talked about. Finally, recommendations are also given to help researchers focus on the areas which are still severely lacking.
XingFKumarAHuangY, et al. Flameless combustion with liquid fuel: a review focusing on fundamentals and gas turbine application. Appl Energ2017; 193: 28–51.
2.
ŞöhretYEkiciSAltuntaş HepbasliÖA, et al. Exergy as a useful tool for the performance assessment of aircraft gas turbine engines: a key review. Prog Aerosp Sci2016; 83: 57–69.
3.
LiSGeYWeiX, et al. Mixing and combustion modeling of hydrogen peroxide/kerosene shear-coaxial jet flame in lab-scale rocket engine. Aerosp Sci Technol2016; 56: 148–154.
4.
KimS-KChoiH-SKimY. Thermodynamic modeling based on a generalized cubic equation of state for kerosene/LOx rocket combustion. Combust Flame2012; 159: 1351–1365.
5.
LeeJBaeC. Application of JP-8 in a heavy duty diesel engine. Fuel2011; 90: 1762–1770.
6.
LeeJLeeJChuS, et al. Emission reduction potential in a light-duty diesel engine fueled by JP-8. Energy2015; 89: 92–99.
7.
BowdenJWestbrookSLePeraM. Jet kerosene fuels for military diesel application. SAE technical paper892070, 1989.
8.
OwensELePeraMLestzS. Use of aviation turbine fuel JP-8 as the single fuel on the battlefield. SAE technical paper892071, 1989.
9.
GarrettRK. Is a single fuel on the battlefield still a viable option? DTIC document, Project no. AD-A276 757, 1993. Washington, DC: National Defense University.
10.
StuckerJPSchankJFDombey-MooreB. Assessment of DoD fuel standardization policies (DTIC document). Santa Monica, CA: National Defense Research Institute, 1994.
11.
MontemayorAFStavinohaLLLestzSJ, et al. Potential benefits from the use of JP-8 fuel in military ground equipment, DTIC document, Interim report no. 249, February1989. San Antonio, TX: Southwest Research Institute.
HeywoodJB. Internal combustion engine fundamentals. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988.
14.
ChenLStoneRRichardsonD. A study of mixture preparation and PM emissions using a direct injection engine fuelled with stoichiometric gasoline/ethanol blends. Fuel2012; 96: 120–130.
15.
ChenLLiangZZhangX, et al. Characterizing particulate matter emissions from GDI and PFI vehicles under transient and cold start conditions. Fuel2017; 189: 131–140.
16.
MuzykaVVeimerSSchmidtN. On the carcinogenic risk evaluation of diesel exhaust: benzene in airborne particles and alterations of heme metabolism in lymphocytes as markers of exposure. Sci Total Environ1998; 217: 103–111.
17.
OberdörsterGYuC-P. The carcinogenic potential of inhaled diesel exhaust: a particle effect?J Aerosol Sci1990; 21: S397–S401.
18.
ManzettiSAndersenO. Biochemical and physiological effects from exhaust emissions: a review of the relevant literature. Pathophysiology2016; 23: 285–293.
19.
CourterLALuchAMusafia-JeknicT, et al. The influence of diesel exhaust on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-induced DNA damage, gene expression, and tumor initiation in Sencar mice in vivo. Cancer Lett2008; 265: 135–147.
20.
CliffordRLJonesMJMacIsaacJL, et al. Inhalation of diesel exhaust and allergen alters human bronchial epithelium DNA methylation. J Allergy Clin Immun2017; 139: 112–121.
21.
WangHFuLZhouY, et al. Trends in vehicular emissions in China’s mega cities from 1995 to 2005. Environ Pollut2010; 158: 394–400.
22.
YangLZhangSWuY, et al. Evaluating real-world CO2 and NOX emissions for public transit buses using a remote wireless on-board diagnostic (OBD) approach. Environ Pollut2016; 218: 453–462.
23.
BellJHonourSPowerS. Effects of vehicle exhaust emissions on urban wild plant species. Environ Pollut2011; 159: 1984–1990.
24.
LawrenceSSokhiRRavindraK. Quantification of vehicle fleet PM10 particulate matter emission factors from exhaust and non-exhaust sources using tunnel measurement techniques. Environ Pollut2016; 210: 419–428.
25.
DegraeuweBWeissM. Does the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) really fail to capture the NOX emissions of diesel cars in Europe?Environ Pollut2017; 222: 234–241.
26.
FontAFullerGW. Did policies to abate atmospheric emissions from traffic have a positive effect in London?Environ Pollut2016; 218: 463–474.
27.
CrippaMJanssens-MaenhoutGGuizzardiD, et al. EU effect: exporting emission standards for vehicles through the global market economy. J Environ Manage2016; 183: 959–971.
28.
HeinrichsHJochemPFichtnerW. Including road transport in the EU ETS (European Emissions Trading System): a model-based analysis of the German electricity and transport sector. Energy2014; 69: 708–720.
29.
HaoHGengYSarkisJ. Carbon footprint of global passenger cars: scenarios through 2050. Energy2016; 101: 121–131.
30.
RajagopalDPlevinRHochmanG, et al. Multi-objective regulations on transportation fuels: comparing renewable fuel mandates and emission standards. Energ Econ2015; 49: 359–369.
31.
Rodriguez-FernandezJTsolakisAAhmadinejadM, et al. Investigation of the deactivation of a NOx-reducing hydrocarbon-selective catalytic reduction (HC-SCR) catalyst by thermogravimetric analysis: effect of the fuel and prototype catalyst. Energ Fuel2009; 24: 992–1000.
32.
GengPCaoETanQ, et al. Effects of alternative fuels on the combustion characteristics and emission products from diesel engines: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev2017; 71: 523–534.
33.
SharmaAMuruganS. Durability analysis of a single cylinder DI diesel engine operating with a non-petroleum fuel. Fuel2017; 191: 393–402.
34.
KaronisDAnastopoulosG. Tribological evaluation of the aviation kerosene for use in CI engines. SAE technical paper 2009-01-2804, 2009.
35.
PandeyAKNandgaonkarM. Performance, emission and pump wear analysis of JP-8 fuel for military use on a 558 kW, CIDI diesel engine. SAE technical paper 2010-01-1518, 2010.
36.
DecJE. A conceptual model of DI diesel combustion based on laser-sheet imaging. SAE technical paper 970873, 1997.
37.
DecJE. Advanced compression—ignition engines—understanding the in-cylinder processes. P Combust Inst2009; 32: 2727–2742.
KamimotoTBaeM-H. High combustion temperature for the reduction of particulate in diesel engines. SAE technical paper 880423, 1983.
40.
YaoMZhengZLiuH. Progress and recent trends in homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) engines. Prog Energ Combust2009; 35: 398–437.
41.
KalghatgiGT. The outlook for fuels for internal combustion engines. Int J Engine Res2014; 15: 383–398.
42.
BaeCKimJ. Alternative fuels for internal combustion engines. P Combust Inst2017; 36: 3389–3413.
43.
YuWYangWTayK, et al. Macroscopic spray characteristics of kerosene and diesel based on two different piezoelectric and solenoid injectors. Exp Therm Fluid Sci2016; 76: 12–23.
44.
ČaikaVKammerdienerTDörrN. Operation of piezoelectric common rail injector with diesel and FT-kerosene. SAE technical paper 2007-24-0070, 2007.
45.
ZhangCLiBRaoF, et al. A shock tube study of the auto-ignition characteristics of RP-3 jet fuel. P Combust Inst2015; 35: 3151–3158.
46.
ZhuYLiSDavidsonDF, et al. Ignition delay times of conventional and alternative fuels behind reflected shock waves. P Combust Inst2015; 35: 241–248.
47.
EdwardsTStrickerJHarrisonWIII. Coordinating support of fuels and lubricant research and development (R&D) 2: handbook of aviation fuel properties, 3rd ed. Report no. 635, December2004. Alpharetta, GA: Coordinating Research Council.
48.
WangHOehlschlaegerMA. Auto-ignition studies of conventional and Fischer-Tropsch jet fuels. Fuel2012; 98: 249–258.
49.
KookSPickettLM. Liquid length and vapor penetration of conventional, Fischer-Tropsch, coal-derived, and surrogate fuel sprays at high-temperature and high-pressure ambient conditions. Fuel2012; 93: 539–548.
50.
WeiLYaoCHanG, et al. Effects of methanol to diesel ratio and diesel injection timing on combustion, performance and emissions of a methanol port premixed diesel engine. Energy2016; 95: 223–232.
51.
DooleySWonSHHeyneJ, et al. The experimental evaluation of a methodology for surrogate fuel formulation to emulate gas phase combustion kinetic phenomena. Combust Flame2012; 159: 1444–1466.
52.
LemaireRFaccinettoATherssenE, et al. Experimental comparison of soot formation in turbulent flames of diesel and surrogate diesel fuels. P Combust Inst2009; 32: 737–744.
53.
ParkYBaeCMounaïm-RousselleC, et al. Application of jet propellant-8 to premixed charge ignition combustion in a single-cylinder diesel engine. Int J Engine Res2015; 16: 92–103.
54.
FernandesGFuschettoJFilipiZ, et al. Impact of military JP-8 fuel on heavy-duty diesel engine performance and emissions. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2007; 221: 957–970.
55.
ShobaTCruaCHeikalM, et al. Optical characterisation of diesel, RME and kerosene sprays by microscopic imaging. In: Proceedings of the 24th European conference on liquid atomization and spray systems (ILASS), Estoril, 5–7 September 2011. Paris: ILASS.
56.
ShresthaAZhengZBadawyT, et al. Development of JP-8 surrogates and their validation using ignition quality tester. SAE Int J Fuel Lubr2014; 7: 337–351.
57.
ParkSHYounIMLimY, et al. Influence of the mixture of gasoline and diesel fuels on droplet atomization, combustion, and exhaust emission characteristics in a compression ignition engine. Fuel Process Technol2013; 106: 392–401.
58.
SuhHKLeeCS. A review on atomization and exhaust emissions of a biodiesel-fueled compression ignition engine. Renew Sust Energ Rev2016; 58: 1601–1620.
59.
De MenezesEWDa SilvaRCatalunaR, et al. Effect of ethers and ether/ethanol additives on the physicochemical properties of diesel fuel and on engine tests. Fuel2006; 85: 815–822.
60.
YangYBoehmanALSantoroRJ. A study of jet fuel sooting tendency using the threshold sooting index (TSI) model. Combust Flame2007; 149: 191–205.
61.
MenschASantoroRJLitzingerTA, et al. Sooting characteristics of surrogates for jet fuels. Combust Flame2010; 157: 1097–1105.
62.
AnastopoulosGLoisEZannikosF, et al. HFRR lubricity response of an additized aviation kerosene for use in CI engines. Tribol Int2002; 35: 599–604.
63.
RepettoSCostelloJFParmenterD. Current and potential aviation additives for higher biofuel blends in Jet A-1. In: ChuckC (ed.) Biofuels for aviation: feedstocks, technology and implementation. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2016, p.261.
64.
SchihlPDecker-HoogterpLPenceK, et al. On the premixed phase combustion behavior of JP-8 in a military relevant single cylinder diesel engine. SAE technical paper 2011-01-0123, 2011.
65.
HuiXKumarKSungC-J, et al. Experimental studies on the combustion characteristics of alternative jet fuels. Fuel2012; 98: 176–182.
66.
KangDKalaskarVKimD, et al. Experimental study of auto-ignition characteristics of Jet-A surrogates and their validation in a motored engine and a constant-volume combustion chamber. Fuel2016; 184: 565–580.
67.
ValcoDGentzGAllenC, et al. Auto-ignition behavior of synthetic alternative jet fuels: an examination of chemical composition effects on ignition delays at low to intermediate temperatures. P Combust Inst2015; 35: 2983–2991.
68.
DeanAPenyazkovOSevrukK, et al. Auto-ignition of surrogate fuels at elevated temperatures and pressures. P Combust Inst2007; 31: 2481–2488.
69.
VasuSSDavidsonDFHansonRK. Jet fuel ignition delay times: shock tube experiments over wide conditions and surrogate model predictions. Combust Flame2008; 152: 125–143.
70.
DooleySWonSHChaosM, et al. A jet fuel surrogate formulated by real fuel properties. Combust Flame2010; 157: 2333–2339.
71.
BalagurunathanJ. Investigation of ignition delay times of conventional (JP-8) and synthetic (S-8) jet fuels: a shock tube study. MSc Thesis, University of Dayton, Dayton, 2011.
72.
Mzé-AhmedADagautPHadj-AliK, et al. Oxidation of a coal-to-liquid synthetic jet fuel: experimental and chemical kinetic modeling study. Energ Fuel2012; 26: 6070–6079.
De ToniAWerlerMHartmannR, et al. Ignition delay times of Jet A-1 fuel: measurements in a high-pressure shock tube and a rapid compression machine. P Combust Inst2017; 36: 3695–3703.
75.
DavidsonDZhuYShaoJ, et al. Ignition delay time correlations for distillate fuels. Fuel2017; 187: 26–32.
76.
ShaoJZhuYWangS, et al. A shock tube study of jet fuel pyrolysis and ignition at elevated pressures and temperatures. Fuel2018; 226: 338–344.
77.
KumarKSungC-J. An experimental study of the auto-ignition characteristics of conventional jet fuel/oxidizer mixtures: Jet-A and JP-8. Combust Flame2010; 157: 676–685.
78.
AllenCToulsonEEdwardsT, et al. Application of a novel charge preparation approach to testing the auto-ignition characteristics of JP-8 and camelina hydroprocessed renewable jet fuel in a rapid compression machine. Combust Flame2012; 159: 2780–2788.
79.
AllenCValcoDToulsonE, et al. Ignition behavior and surrogate modeling of JP-8 and of camelina and tallow hydrotreated renewable jet fuels at low temperatures. Combust Flame2013; 160: 232–239.
80.
ValcoDJMinKOldaniA, et al. Low temperature auto-ignition of conventional jet fuels and surrogate jet fuels with targeted properties in a rapid compression machine. P Combust Inst2017; 36: 3687–3694.
81.
PickettLMHoogterpL. Fundamental spray and combustion measurements of JP-8 at diesel conditions. SAE technical paper 2008-01-1083, 2008.
82.
ZhengZLeeP-IShresthaA, et al. Role of volatility in the development of JP-8 surrogates for diesel engine application. SAE technical paper 2014-01-1389, 2014.
83.
SchihlPHoogterp-DeckerL. On the ignition behavior of JP-8 in military relevant diesel engines (SAE2011-01-0119). SAE Int J Engines2011; 4: 1–13.
84.
RothamerDAMurphyL. Systematic study of ignition delay for jet fuels and diesel fuel in a heavy-duty diesel engine. P Combust Inst2013; 34: 3021–3029.
85.
KimDMartzJVioliA. A surrogate for emulating the physical and chemical properties of conventional jet fuel. Combust Flame2014; 161: 1489–1498.
86.
YanowitzJRatcliffMAMcCormickRL, et al. Compendium of experimental Cetane numbers. Technical Repot, Report no. NREL/TP-5400-61693, August2014. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
87.
KookSPickettLM. Soot volume fraction and morphology of conventional and surrogate jet fuel sprays at 1000-K and 6.7-MPa ambient conditions. P Combust Inst2011; 33: 2911–2918.
88.
KookSPickettLM. Soot volume fraction and morphology of conventional, Fischer-Tropsch, coal-derived, and surrogate fuel at diesel conditions. SAE technical paper 2012-01-0678, 2012.
89.
JingWRobertsWLFangT. Spray combustion of Jet-A and diesel fuels in a constant volume combustion chamber. Energ Convers Manage2015; 89: 525–540.
90.
SongLLiuTFuW, et al. Experimental study on spray characteristics of ethanol-aviation kerosene blended fuel with a high-pressure common rail injection system. J Energy Inst2018; 91: 203–213.
91.
YuWYangWMohanB, et al. Numerical and experimental study on internal nozzle flow and macroscopic spray characteristics of a kind of wide distillation fuel (WDF) —kerosene. SAE technical paper 2016-01-0839, 2016.
92.
YuWYangWZhaoF. Investigation of internal nozzle flow, spray and combustion characteristics fueled with diesel, gasoline and wide distillation fuel (WDF) based on a piezoelectric injector and a direct injection compression ignition engine. Appl Therm Eng2017; 114: 905–920.
93.
SuWGuoHSunT. Effect of injection pressure on spray characteristics and fuel distribution in diesel engine conditions by planar laser-induced exciplex fluorescence (PLIEF) technology. Atomization Spray2008; 18: 761–779.
94.
SuWSuTGuoH, et al. Quantitative study of concentration and temperature of a diesel spray by using planar laser induced exciplex fluorescence technique. SAE Int J Engines2010; 3: 717–732.
95.
FerrariAMitticaA. FEM modeling of the piezoelectric driving system in the design of direct-acting diesel injectors. Appl Energ2012; 99: 471–483.
96.
LeDPietrzakBWShaverGM. Dynamic surface control of a piezoelectric fuel injector during rate shaping. Control Eng Pract2014; 30: 12–26.
97.
PayriRGimenoJVieraJP, et al. Needle lift profile influence on the vapor phase penetration for a prototype diesel direct acting piezoelectric injector. Fuel2013; 113: 257–265.
98.
VieraJPPayriRSwantekAB, et al. Linking instantaneous rate of injection to X-ray needle lift measurements for a direct-acting piezoelectric injector. Energ Convers Manage2016; 112: 350–358.
99.
MohanBYangWKiang ChouS. Fuel injection strategies for performance improvement and emissions reduction in compression ignition engines —a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev2013; 28: 664–676.
100.
ZhaKYuXJansonsM. Simultaneous high-speed two-color thermometry and laser-induced incandescence soot measurement in a small-bore optical engine fueled with JP-8. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2012 internal combustion engine division fall technical conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 23–26 September 2012, p.313–326. New York: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME).
101.
LeeJOhHBaeC. Combustion process of JP-8 and fossil diesel fuel in a heavy duty diesel engine using two-color thermometry. Fuel2012; 102: 264–273.
102.
YuXZhaKFloreaR, et al. Comparison of in-cylinder soot evolution in an optically accessible engine fueled with JP-8 and ULSD. SAE technical paper 2012-01-1315, 2012.
103.
JansonsMFloreaRZhaK, et al. The effect of HCHO addition on combustion in an optically accessible diesel engine fueled with JP-8. SAE technical paper 2010-01-2136, 2010.
104.
JansonsMFloreaRZhaK, et al. The combined effect of HCHO and C2H4 addition on combustion in an optically accessible diesel engine fueled with JP-8. SAE technical paper 2011-01-1392, 2011.
105.
ChangYJiaMLiuY, et al. Application of a decoupling methodology for development of skeletal oxidation mechanisms for heavy n-alkanes from n-octane to n-hexadecane. Energ Fuel2013; 27: 3467–3479.
106.
LeeH. Biodiesel, HSD, and JP-8 combustion process and emission characteristics in a dual-stage fuel injection condition. Int J Energ Power Eng2014; 3: 209–216.
107.
SinghSReitzRDMusculusMP. Comparison of the characteristic time (CTC), representative interactive flamelet (RIF), and direct integration with detailed chemistry combustion models against optical diagnostic data for multi-mode combustion in a heavy-duty DI diesel engine. SAE technical paper 2006-01-0055, 2006.
108.
LutzTModiyaniR. Brake thermal efficiency improvements of a commercially based diesel engine modified for operation on JP 8 fuel. SAE technical paper 2011-01-0120, 2011.
109.
VanceEGiordanoDDRogersJ, et al. Demonstration of power improvements on a diesel engine operating on multiple fuels. SAE technical paper 2010-01-1318, 2010.
110.
MosburgerMFuschettoJAssanisD, et al. Impact of high sulfur military JP-8 fuel on heavy duty diesel engine EGR cooler condensate. SAE technical paper 2008-01-1081, 2008.
111.
SmithMFilipiZSchihlP, et al. Effect of high sulfur military JP-8 fuel on heavy duty diesel engine emissions and EGR cooler condensate. In: Proceedings of the ASME internal combustion engine division fall technical conference, San Antonio, TX, 12–15 September 2010, pp.99–110. New York: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME).
112.
YostDMMontalvoDAFrameEA. U.S. Army investigation of diesel exhaust emissions using JP-8 fuels with varying sulfur content. SAE technical paper 961981, 1996.
113.
YassineMTagomoriMHeneinN, et al. White smoke emissions under cold starting of diesel engines. SAE technical paper 960249, 1996.
114.
TeohYMasjukiHKalamM, et al. Impact of premixed kerosene fuel on performance, emission and combustion characteristics in partial HCCI engine. Enrgy Proced2014; 61: 1830–1834.
115.
PischingerSRajamaniVKJeihouniY. Impact of fuel properties on the performance of a direct injection diesel engine under part homogeneous operating conditions. SAE technical paper 2011-01-1358, 2011.
116.
MuetherMLampingMKolbeckA, et al. Advanced combustion for low emissions and high efficiency—part 1: impact of engine hardware on HCCI combustion. SAE technical paper 2008-01-2405, 2008.
117.
CracknellRFRickeardDJArizteguiJ, et al. Advanced combustion for low emissions and high efficiency—part 2: impact of fuel properties on HCCI combustion. SAE technical paper 2008-01-2404, 2008.
118.
WuY-YTsaiH-CLiuT-C. Investigation of running HCCI with dual-fuel in a small scale engine. In: Proceedings of the ASME internal combustion engine division fall technical conference, San Antonio, TX, 12–15 September 2010, pp.341–349. New York: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME).
119.
RisbergPKalghatgiGÅngstromH-E, et al. Auto-ignition quality of diesel-like fuels in HCCI engines. SAE technical paper 2005-01-2127, 2005.
120.
SoloiuVCovingtonALewisJ, et al. Performance of JP-8 unified fuel in a small bore indirect injection diesel engine for APU applications. SAE technical paper 2012-01-1199, 2012.
121.
SoloiuVCovingtonALewisJ, et al. JP-8 combustion characteristics in a small diesel auxiliary power unit. In: Proceedings of the ASME internal combustion engine division fall technical conference, Morgantown, WV, 2–5 October 2011, pp.151–158. New York: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME).
122.
ChiattiGChiavolaO. Performance characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with avio-kerosene. In: Proceedings of the ASME internal combustion engine division spring technical conference, Salzburg, 11–14 May 2003, pp.45–51. New York: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME).
123.
KotsiopoulosPYfantisELoisE, et al. Diesel and JP-8 fuel performance on a Petter AV1 diesel engine. In: Proceedings of the 39th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit (AIAA2001-0500), Reno, NV, 8–11 January 2001, https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2001-500
124.
AndrewsGAbdelhalimSWilliamsP. Characterization of diesel particulate emissions of two IDI diesel engines using diesel and kerosene fuels. SAE technical paper 961231, 1996.
125.
AndrewsGAbdelhalimSWilliamsP. Pyrosynthesis of PAH in a modern IDI diesel engine. SAE technical paper 961230, 1996.
126.
ArkoudeasPKalligerosSZannikosF, et al. Study of using JP-8 aviation fuel and biodiesel in CI engines. Energ Convers Manage2003; 44: 1013–1025.
127.
PatilKThipseS. Characteristics of performance and emissions in a direct-injection diesel engine fuelled with kerosene/diesel blends. Int J Automot Mech Eng2014; 10: 2102–2111.
128.
NargundeJJayakumarCSinhaA, et al. Effect of swirl and injection pressure on performance and emissions of JP-8 fueled high speed single cylinder diesel engine. In: Proceedings of the ASME internal combustion engine division fall technical conference, San Antonio, TX, 12–15 September 2010, pp.163–173. New York: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME).
129.
NargundeJJayakumarCSinhaA, et al. Comparison between combustion, performance and emission characteristics of JP-8 and ultra low sulfur diesel fuel in a single cylinder diesel engine. SAE technical paper 2010-01-1123, 2010.
130.
ChenGGambleJNMcAndrewDW, et al. Analytical and experimental investigation of medium-speed diesel engine using a kerosene fuel. In: Proceedings of the ASME internal combustion engine division spring technical conference, Aachen, 7–10 May 2006, pp.437–442. New York: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME).
131.
MoritaASugiyamaG. Influence of density and viscosity of diesel fuel on exhaust emissions. SAE technical paper 2003-01-1869, 2003.
132.
LabeckasGSlavinskasSVilutienėV. Combustion, performance and emission characteristics of diesel engine operating on jet fuel treated with the Cetane improver. In: Proceedings of 12th international scientific conference “engineering for rural development,”Jelgava, 23–24 May 2013, pp.23–24, http://ageng.asu.lt/ae/article/view/86
133.
SoloiuVOchiengHWeaverJ, et al. Combustion and emissions characteristics of JP-8 blends and ULSD# 2 with similar CN in a direct injection naturally aspirated compression engine. SAE technical paper 2013-01-1682, 2013.
134.
JayakumarCZhengZJoshiU, et al. Effect of intake pressure and temperature on the auto-ignition of fuels with different Cetane number and volatility. SAE technical paper 2012-01-1317, 2012.
135.
MurphyLRothamerD. Effects of Cetane number on jet fuel combustion in a heavy-duty compression ignition engine at high load. SAE technical paper 2011-01-0335, 2011.
136.
JayakumarCZhengZJoshiUM, et al. Effect of inlet air temperature on auto-ignition of fuels with different Cetane number and volatility. In: Proceedings of the ASME internal combustion engine division fall technical conference, Morgantown, WV, 2–5 October 2011, pp.261–272. New York: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME).
137.
WadumesthrigeKJohnsonNWinston-GalantM, et al. Performance, durability, and stability of a power generator fueled with ULSD, S-8, JP-8, and biodiesel. SAE technical paper 2010-01-0636, 2010.
138.
KotsiopoulosPPapagiannakisRTsakalouP, et al. Experimental investigation concerning the effect of the use of Biodiesel and F-34 (JP-8) aviation fuel on performance and emissions of a DI diesel engine. SAE technical paper 2007-01-1450, 2007.
139.
JayakumarCNargundeJSinhaA, et al. Effect of biodiesel, jet propellant (JP-8) and ultra low sulfur diesel fuel on auto-ignition, combustion, performance and emissions in a single cylinder diesel engine. J Eng Gas Turb Power2012; 134: 022801.
140.
MahmudulHHagosFMamatR, et al. Production, characterization and performance of biodiesel as an alternative fuel in diesel engines—a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev2017; 72: 497–509.
141.
RoyMMWangWAlawiM. Performance and emissions of a diesel engine fueled by biodiesel-diesel, biodiesel-diesel-additive and kerosene-biodiesel blends. Energ Convers Manage2014; 84: 164–173.
142.
PatilKThipseS. Experimental investigation of CI engine combustion, performance and emissions in DEE-kerosene-diesel blends of high DEE concentration. Energ Convers Manage2015; 89: 396–408.
143.
LabeckasGSlavinskasS. Combustion phenomenon, performance and emissions of a diesel engine with aviation turbine JP-8 fuel and rapeseed biodiesel blends. Energ Convers Manage2015; 105: 216–229.
144.
AydınH. Scrutinizing the combustion, performance and emissions of safflower biodiesel–kerosene fueled diesel engine used as power source for a generator. Energ Convers Manage2016; 117: 400–409.
145.
UyumazASolmazHYılmazE, et al. Experimental examination of the effects of military aviation fuel JP-8 and biodiesel fuel blends on the engine performance, exhaust emissions and combustion in a direct injection engine. Fuel Process Technol2014; 128: 158–165.
146.
BayındırHIşıkMZAydınH. Evaluation of combustion, performance and emission indicators of canola oil-kerosene blends in a power generator diesel engine. Appl Therm Eng2017; 114: 234–244.
147.
UddinSAAzadAKAlamM, et al. Performance of a diesel engine run with mustard-kerosene blends. Procedia Engineer2015; 105: 698–704.
148.
YamikH. An investigation of effect of biodiesel and aviation fuel jetA-1 mixtures performance and emissions on diesel engine. Therm Sci2014; 18: 239–247.
149.
VenkannaBReddyCV. Performance, emission and combustion characteristics of DI diesel engine running on blends of honne oil/diesel fuel/kerosene/DMC. Int J Agr Biol Eng2011; 4: 48–57.
150.
KorresDPainesakiAKaronisD, et al. Use of ethanol along with biodiesel in diesel and jet fuels on a stationary diesel engine. SAE technical paper 2005-01-3676, 2005.
151.
KorresDMLoisEKaronisD. Use of JP-8 aviation fuel and biodiesel on a diesel engine. SAE technical paper 2004-01-3033, 2004.
152.
BayindirH. The effects of cottonseed oil-kerosene blends on a diesel engine performance and exhaust emissions. Energ Source Part A2010; 32: 901–908.
153.
DagautPCathonnetM. The ignition, oxidation, and combustion of kerosene: a review of experimental and kinetic modeling. Prog Energ Combust2006; 32: 48–92.
154.
MalewickiTGudiyellaSBrezinskyK. Experimental and modeling study on the oxidation of Jet A and the n-dodecane/iso-octane/n-propylbenzene/1, 3, 5-trimethylbenzene surrogate fuel. Combust Flame2013; 160: 17–30.
155.
VandersickelAWrightYBoulouchosK. Global reaction mechanism for the auto-ignition of full boiling range gasoline and kerosene fuels. Combust Theor Model2013; 17: 1020–1052.
156.
YuWYangWTayK, et al. An optimization method for formulating model-based jet fuel surrogate by emulating physical, gas phase chemical properties and threshold sooting index (TSI) of real jet fuel under engine relevant conditions. Combust Flame2018; 193: 192–217.
157.
YuWZhaoFYangW, et al. Development of an optimization methodology for formulating both jet fuel and diesel fuel surrogates and their associated skeletal oxidation mechanisms. Fuel2018; 231: 361–372.
158.
YuXLuoXJansonsM, et al. A fuel surrogate validation approach using a JP-8 fueled optically accessible compression ignition engine (SAE 2015-01-0906). SAE Int J Fuels Lubr2015; 8: 119–134.
159.
KimDMartzJAbdul-NourA, et al. A six-component surrogate for emulating the physical and chemical characteristics of conventional and alternative jet fuels and their blends. Combust Flame2017; 179: 86–94.
160.
DagautPKarsentyFDaymaG, et al. Experimental and detailed kinetic model for the oxidation of a Gas to Liquid (GtL) jet fuel. Combust Flame2014; 161: 835–847.
161.
HonnetSSeshadriKNiemannU, et al. A surrogate fuel for kerosene. P Combust Inst2009; 32: 485–492.
162.
DagautPGaïlS. Chemical kinetic study of the effect of a biofuel additive on Jet-A1 combustion. J Phys Chem A2007; 111: 3992–4000.
163.
VioliAYanSEddingsE, et al. Experimental formulation and kinetic model for JP-8 surrogate mixtures. Combust Sci Technol2002; 174: 399–417.
164.
MawidMSekarB. Detailed chemical kinetic modeling of JP-8/Jet-A fuels ignition in high pressure shock tube. AIAA Paper2006; 5102: 9–12.
165.
LindstedtRMauriceL. Detailed chemical-kinetic model for aviation fuels. J Propul Power2000; 16: 187–195.
166.
ZhangHREddingsEGSarofimAF. Criteria for selection of components for surrogates of natural gas and transportation fuels. P Combust Inst2007; 31: 401–409.
167.
ChenXKhaniEChenC. A unified jet fuel surrogate for droplet evaporation and ignition. Fuel2016; 182: 284–291.
168.
GuéretCCathonnetMBoettnerJ-C, et al. Experimental study and modeling of kerosene oxidation in a jet-stirred flow reactor. Sym (Int) Combust1991; 23: 211–216.
169.
VovelleCDelfauJ-LReuillonM. Formation of aromatic hydrocarbons in decane and kerosene flames at reduced pressure. In: BockhornH (ed.) Soot formation in combustion. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, 1994, p.50–65.
DagautP. On the kinetics of hydrocarbons oxidation from natural gas to kerosene and diesel fuel. Phys Chem Chem Phys2002; 4: 2079–2094.
172.
AgostaA. Development of a chemical surrogate for JP-8 aviation fuel using a pressurized flow reactor. MSc Thesis, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 2002.
173.
MontgomeryCCannonSMawidM, et al. Reduced chemical kinetic mechanisms for JP-8 combustion. In: Proceedings of the 40th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, 14–17 January 2002, https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a447825.pdf
174.
MawidMParkTSekarB, et al. Development of detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms for ignition/oxidation of JP-8/Jet-A/JP-7 fuels. In: Proceedings of the ASME turbo expo 2003, collocated with the 2003 international joint power generation conference, Atlanta, GA, 16–19 June 2003, pp.613–624. New York: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME).
175.
DagautPEl BakaliARistoriA. The combustion of kerosene: experimental results and kinetic modelling using 1-to 3-component surrogate model fuels. Fuel2006; 85: 944–956.
176.
GokulakrishnanPGainesGCurranoJ, et al. Experimental and kinetic modeling of kerosene-type fuels at gas turbine operating conditions. J Eng Gas Turb Power2007; 129: 655–663.
177.
DagautP. Kinetics of jet fuel combustion over extended conditions: experimental and modeling. J Eng Gas Turb Power2007; 129: 394–403.
178.
ZaevIAStrelkovaMIKirillovIA, et al. Validation of the short kinetic mechanism for Jet A —air detonations. In: Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Cincinnati, OH, 8–11 July 2007, https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2007-5079
179.
RoquemoreWLitzingerTColketM, et al. Combustion science to reduce PM emissions for military platforms (DTIC document). Final Report, Report no. WP-1577, 3January2012. Arlington, VA: Strategic Environment Research and Development Programme (SERDP).
180.
DenmanBMMunzarJDBergthorsonJM. An experimental and numerical study of the laminar flame speed of jet fuel surrogate blends. In: Proceedings of the ASME turbo 2012: expo turbine technical conference and exposition, Copenhagen, 11–15 June 2012, p.1417–1426. New York: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME).
181.
TayKLYangWMohanB, et al. Development of a robust and compact kerosene-diesel reaction mechanism for diesel engines. Energ Convers Manage2016; 108: 446–458.
182.
TayKLYangWMohanB, et al. Development of a reduced kerosene-diesel reaction mechanism with embedded soot chemistry for diesel engines. Fuel2016; 181: 926–934.
183.
ZettervallNFurebyCNilssonE. Small skeletal kinetic mechanism for kerosene combustion. Energ Fuel2016; 30: 9801–9813.
184.
AlekseevVSoloviova-SokolovaJMatveevS, et al. Laminar burning velocities of n-decane and binary kerosene surrogate mixture. Fuel2017; 187: 429–434.
185.
KoniavitisPRigopoulosSJonesW. Reduction of a detailed chemical mechanism for a kerosene surrogate via RCCE-CSP. Combust Flame2018; 194: 85–106.
186.
KimDVioliA. Hydrocarbons for the next generation of jet fuel surrogates. Fuel2018; 228: 438–444.
187.
NarayanaswamyKPitschHPepiotP. A component library framework for deriving kinetic mechanisms for multi-component fuel surrogates: application for jet fuel surrogates. Combust Flame2016; 165: 288–309.
188.
CungKBhagatMZhangA, et al. Numerical study on emission characteristics of high-pressure dimethyl ether (DME) under different engine ambient conditions. SAE technical paper 2013-01-0319, 2013.
189.
AgostaACernanskyNMillerD, et al. Reference components of jet fuels: kinetic modeling and experimental results. Exp Therm Fluid Sci2004; 28: 701–708.
190.
EddingsEGYanSCiroW, et al. Formulation of a surrogate for the simulation of jet fuel pool fires. Combust Sci and Tech2005; 177: 715–739.
191.
ShresthaAJoshiUZhengZ, et al. Experimental validation and combustion modeling of a JP-8 surrogate in a single cylinder diesel engine. SAE technical paper 2014-01-1376, 2014.
192.
WangHXuRWangK, et al. A physics—based approach to modeling real—fuel combustion chemistry —I: evidence from experiments, and thermodynamic, chemical kinetic and statistical considerations. Combust Flame2018; 193: 502–519.
193.
XuRWangKBanerjeeS, et al. A Physics-based approach to modeling real-fuel combustion chemistry —II: reaction kinetic models of jet and rocket fuels. Combust Flame2018; 193: 520–537.
194.
AnHYangWMaghbouliA, et al. A numerical study on a hydrogen assisted diesel engine. Int J Hydrogen Energ2013; 38: 2919–2928.
195.
ZhaoFYangWZhouD, et al. Numerical modelling of soot formation and oxidation using phenomenological soot modelling approach in a dual-fueled compression ignition engine. Fuel2017; 188: 382–389.
196.
AnHYangWMaghbouliA, et al. A skeletal mechanism for biodiesel blend surrogates combustion. Energ Convers Manage2014; 81: 51–59.
197.
KavuriCSinghSKrishnanSR, et al. Computational analysis of combustion of high and low Cetane fuels in a compression ignition engine. J Eng Gas Turb Power2014; 136: 121506.
