This article deals with the design of a partial preview active suspension control algorithm for the improvement of vehicle ride comfort. Generally, while preview-controlled active suspension systems have even greater potential than feedback-controlled systems, their main challenge is obtaining preview information of the road profile ahead. A critical drawback of the “look-ahead” sensors is an increased risk of incorrect detection influenced by water, snow, and other soft obstacles on the road. In this work, a feasible wheelbase preview suspension control algorithm without information about the road elevation has been developed based on a novel 3-degree-of-freedom full-car dynamic model which incorporates only the vehicle body dynamics. The main advantage of the employed vehicle model is that the system disturbance input vector consists of vertical wheel accelerations that can be measured easily. The measured acceleration information of the front wheels is used for predictive control of the rear suspension to stabilize the body motion. The suspension state estimator has also been designed to completely remove the effect of unknown road disturbance on the state estimation error. The estimation performance of an observer is verified via a simulation study and field tests. The performance of the proposed suspension controller is evaluated on a frequency domain and time domain via a simulation study. It is shown that the vehicle ride comfort can be improved more by the proposed wheelbase preview control approach than by the feedback approach.
ElsPSTheronNJUysPE, et al. The ride comfort vs handling compromise for off-road vehicles. J Terramechanics2007; 44: 303–317.
2.
HuangSJChenHY. Adaptive sliding controller with self-tuning fuzzy compensation for vehicle suspension control. Mechatronics2006; 16: 607–622.
3.
YoshimuraTKumeAKurimmotoM, et al. Construction of an active suspension system of a quarter car model using the concept of sliding mode control. J Sound Vib2001; 239: 187–199.
4.
DavisBRThompsonAG. Optimal linear active suspensions with integral constraint. Vehicle Syst Dyn1988; 17: 357–366.
5.
KrtolicaRHrovatD. Optimal active suspension control based on a half-car model. In: Proceedings of the 29th IEEE conference on decision and control, Honolulu, HI, 5–7 December 1990, pp.2238–2243. New York: IEEE.
6.
ShirahattiAPrasadPSSPanzadeP, et al. Optimal design of passenger car suspension for ride and road holding. J Braz Soc Mech Sci2008; 30: 66–76.
7.
SalemMMMAly AymanA. Fuzzy control of a quarter-car suspension system. In: International conference in mechanical engineering, ICME, Tokyo, Japan, 27–29 May 2009, pp.258–263. New York: IEEE.
8.
GasparPSzasziIBokorJ. Design of robust controller for active vehicle suspension using the mixed μ synthesis. Vehicle Syst Dyn2003; 40: 193–228.
9.
ChamseddineANouraHRaharijanaT. Control of linear full vehicle active suspension system using sliding mode techniques. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE, International conference on control applications, Munich, 4–6 October 2006. New York: IEEE.
10.
YagizNYuksekISivriogluS. Robust control of active suspensions for a full vehicle model using sliding mode control. JSME Int J C: Mech Sy2000; 43: 253–258.
11.
YagizNYuksekI. Sliding mode control of active suspensions for a full vehicle model. Int J Vehicle Des2001; 26: 265–276.
12.
HacA. Optimal linear preview control of active vehicle suspension. Vehicle Syst Dyn1992; 21: 167–195.
13.
BalzerLA. Optimal control with partial preview of disturbances and rate penalties and its application to vehicle suspension. Int J Control1981; 33: 323–345.
14.
ThompsonAGPearceCE. Physically realisable feedback controls for a fully active preview suspension applied to a half-car model. Vehicle Syst Dyn1998; 30: 17–35.
15.
LouamNWilsonDSharpR. Optimization and performance enhancement of active suspensions for automobiles under preview of the road. Veh Syst Dyn1992; 21: 39–63.
16.
YounI. Optimal design of discrete time preview controllers for semi-active and active suspension systems. KSME Int J2000; 14: 807–815.
17.
KangOParkYParkY-S, et al. Look-ahead preview control application to the high-mobility tracked vehicle model with trailing arms. J Mech Sci Technol2009; 23: 914–917.
18.
MartinusDSoenarkoBNazaruddinYY. Optimal control design with preview for semi-active suspension on a half-vehicle model. In: Proceedings of the 35th IEEE conference on decision and control, vol. 3, Kobe, Japan, 13 December 1996, pp.2798–2803. New York: IEEE.
19.
HuismanRGMVeldpausFVoetsH, et al. An optimal continuous time control strategy for active suspensions with preview. Vehicle Syst Dyn1993; 22: 43–55.
20.
HuismanRVeldpausFVan HeckJ, et al. Preview estimation and control for (semi-) active suspensions. Vehicle Syst Dyn1993; 22: 335–346.
21.
MarzbanradJAhmadiGZohoorH, et al. Stochastic optimal preview control of a vehicle suspension. J Sound Vib2004; 275: 973–990.
22.
SenthilSNarayananS. Optimal preview control of a two-DOF vehicle model using stochastic optimal control theory. Vehicle Syst Dyn1996; 25: 413–430.
23.
MehraRAminJHedrickK, et al. Active suspension using preview information and model predictive control. In: Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE international conference on control applications, Hartford, CT, 5–7 October 1997, pp.860–865. New York: IEEE.
24.
ChoBK. Active suspension controller design using MPC with preview information. KSME Int J1999; 13: 168–174.
25.
ChoBKRyuGSongSJ. Control strategy of an active suspension for a half car model with preview information. Int J Auto Techn2005; 6: 243–249.
26.
GöhrleCWagnerASchindlerA, et al. Active suspension controller using MPC based on a full-car model with preview information. In: 2012 American control conference, Montreal, QC, Canada, 27–29 June 2012, pp.497–502. New York: IEEE.
27.
GöhrleCSchindlerAWagnerA, et al. Model predictive control of semi-active and active suspension systems with available road preview. In: 2013 European control conference (ECC), Zurich, 17–19 July 2013, pp.1499–1504. New York: IEEE.
28.
GöhrleCSchindlerAWagnerA, et al. Design and vehicle implementation of preview active suspension controllers. IEEE T Contr Syst T2014; 22: 1135–1142.
29.
GöhrleCSchindlerAWagnerA, et al. Road profile estimation and preview control for low-bandwidth active suspension systems. IEEE/ASME T Mech2015; 20: 2299–2310.
RajamaniRHedrickJK. Adaptive observer for active automotive suspensions. In: 1993 American control conference, San Francisco, CA, 2–4 June 1993, pp.706–710. New York: IEEE.
PletschenNDiepoldKJ. Nonlinear state estimation for suspension control applications: a Takagi-Sugeno Kalman filtering approach. Control Eng Pract2017; 61: 292–306.
35.
DugardLSenameOAubouetS, et al. Full vertical car observer design methodology for suspension control applications. Control Eng Pract2012; 20: 832–845.
36.
RenHChenSZhaoY, et al. State observer-based sliding mode control for semi-active hydro-pneumatic suspension. Vehicle Syst Dyn2016; 54: 168–190.
37.
EsmailzadehEFahimiF. Optimal adaptive active suspensions for a full car model. Vehicle Syst Dyn1997; 27: 89–107.
38.
ElBeheiryEMKarnoppDCElArabyME, et al. Suboptimal control design of active and passive suspensions based on a full car model. Vehicle Syst Dyn1996; 26: 197–222.
39.
ArunachalamKMannar JawaharPTamilporaiP. Active suspension system with preview control —a review. SAE technical paper 2003-28-0037, 2003.
40.
MerkerTGirresGThriemerO. Active body control (ABC) the DaimlerChrysler active suspension and damping system. SAE technical paper 2002-21-0054, 2002.
41.
KochGFritschOLohmannB. Potential of low bandwidth active suspension control with continuously variable damper. Control Eng Pract2010; 18: 1251–1262.
42.
MarzbanradJAhmadiGHojjatY, et al. Optimal active control of vehicle suspension system including time delay and preview for rough roads. J Vib Control2002; 8: 967–991.
43.
SimonD. Optimal state estimation: Kalman, H infinity, and nonlinear approaches. John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
44.
MoranANagaiM. Optimal preview control of rear suspension using nonlinear neural networks. Vehicle Syst Dyn1993; 22: 321–334.
45.
HedrickJKButsuenT. Invariant properties of automotive suspensions. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering1990; 204: 21–27.
46.
ISO2631-1:1997. Mechanical vibration and shock—evaluation of human exposure to whole body vibration —part 1: general requirements.
47.
ZuoLNayfehS. Low order continuous-time filters for approximation of the ISO2631-1 human vibration sensitivity weightings. J Sound Vib2002; 265: 459–465.
