This paper proposed a framework for development of real-world driving cycle in India after a thorough review and comparison of motorcycle driving cycles used in different countries. A limited state-of-the art work for the development of driving cycles for motorcycles is available. The motorcycle driving cycles developed by different countries differ from each other in terms of their driving cycle characteristics, emission factors, and fuel economy. This paper reviewed the parameters of real-world driving cycles of motorcycles and compares the same with legislative cycles concerning their characteristics and emissions. The parameters of real-world driving cycles and Indian legislative cycle (IDC) deviate significantly from other legislative cycles in the range of −97% to +1172% and −74% to 284% respectively. The emission factors of the legislative cycle do not match with the realistic emissions measured by real-world driving cycles. This is due to the reason that the legislative cycles do not represent the current traffic scenario and hence need to be revised. A framework is proposed to develop a real-world driving cycle in India.
Nielson. Petroleum planning and analysis cell. In: Ministry of petroleum and natural gas. New Delhi: Government of India, 2013.
4.
World Health Organization. Ambient air pollution: A global assessment of exposure and burden of disease, World Health Organization, 2016: 1–121.
5.
ShabaziHHassaniAHoseiniV. Evaluation of Tehran clean air action plan using emission inventory approach. Urban Clim2019; 27: 446–456.
6.
KumarSYadavNDasS, et al. Green vehicle rating for 2 and 3 wheelers in India. New Delhi, India: Alliance for Energy Efficient Economy, 2018.
7.
TungHDTongHYHungWT, et al. Development of emission factors and emission inventories for motorcycles and light duty vehicles in the urban region in Vietnam. Sci Total Environ2011; 409: 2761–2767.
8.
SharmaMDikshitO. Comprehensive study on air pollution and green house gases in Delhi. Kanpur, India: Department of Civil Engineering, IIT, 2016.
9.
AlvarezRWeilenmannMFavezJY. Assessing the real world performance of modern pollutant abatement systems on motorcycles, Atmos Environ2009; 43: 1503–1509.
10.
TongHYTungHHungW, et al. Development of driving cycle for motorcycles and light-duty vehicles in Vietnam. Atmosp Environ2011; 45: 5191–5199.
11.
WangZWuYZhouY, et al. Real world emissions of gasoline passenger car in Macao and their correlation with driving conditions. Int J Environ Sci Technol2014; 11: 1135–1146.
12.
DavisSCDiegelSWBoundyRG. Transportation energy data book. 33rd ed.Washington, DC: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy US, Dept. of Energy Sai Kiran Mayakuntala, 2014.
13.
GalgamuwaUPereraLBandaraS. Development of a driving cycle for Colombo, Sri Lanka: an economical approach for developing countries. J Adv Transp2016; 50: 1520–1530.
14.
GalgamuwaUPereraLBandaraS. A representativedriving cycle for the southern expressway compared to existing driving cycle. Transp Dev Econ2016; 2: 22.
15.
Al-SamaniA. Real world driving cycle: Case study of Baqubah, Iraq. Diyala J Eng Sci2016; 10(2): 39–47.
16.
LaiJYuLPEAsceM, et al. Development of city-specific driving cycles for transit buses based on VSP distributions, Case of Beijing. Transp Eng2013; 139(7): 749–757.
17.
NesamaniKSSubramanianKP. Development of a driving cycle for intra-city buses in Chennai, India. Atmosp Environ2011; 45: 5469–5479.
18.
AmirjamshidiGMathewJRoorda. Development of simulated driving cycles for light, medium and heavy duty trucks: case of the Toronto Waterfront Area. Transp Res Part D Trans Environ2009; 34: 255–266.
19.
SalehWKumarRSharmaA. Driving cycle for motorcycles in modern cities: case studies of Edinburgh and Delhi. World J Sci Technol Sustain Dev2010; 7(3): 263–274.
20.
KumarRDuraiBKParidaP, et al., Driving cycle for motorcycle using micro-simulation. J Environ Prot Ecol2012: 1268–1273.
21.
KruseRHulsT. Development of the federal urban driving schedule, SAE Technical Paper 730553, 1973. DOI: 10.4271/730553.
22.
SalehWKumarRKirbyH, et al. Real world driving cycle for motorcycle in Edinburgh. Transp Res Part D Transp Eniron2009; 14(5): 326–333.
23.
ArunNHMaheshSRamaduraiG, et al. Development of driving cycles for passenger cars and motorcycles in Chennai, India. Sustainable Cities Soc2017; 32: 508–512.
24.
AdakPSahuRElumalaiSP. Development of emission factors for motorcycles and shared auto-rickshaws using real world driving cycle for a typical Indian city, Science. Total Environ2016; 544: 290–308.
25.
GandhiKKZvonowVASinghA, et al. Development of a driving cycle for fuel economy in a developing country. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract V1983; 17(1): 1–11.
26.
TsaiJHChiangHLHsuYC, et al. Development of a local real world driving cycle for motorcycles for emission factor measurement. Atmos Environ2005; 39: 6631–6641.
27.
TzengGHChenJJ. Developing a Taipei motorcycle driving cycle for emission and emissions and fuel economy. Transp Res D1988; 3(1): 19–27.
28.
TamayanaNChungpaibulpatanaS. Influence of driving cycle on exhaust emissions fuel consumption of gasoline line passenger cars in Bangkok. J Environ Sci2008; 21: 604–611.
29.
ChughSKumarPMuralidharanM, et al. Development of Delhi driving cycle: a tool for realistic assessment of exhaust emissions from passenger cars in Delhi. SAE Int 2012-01-0877, 2012.
30.
SunYXuHWuJ, et al. Data processing framework for development of driving cycles with data from SHRR 2 Naturalistic driving study. J Transp Res Board2017; 2645(1): 50–56.
31.
SeedamASatiennamTRadpukdeeT, et al. Development motorcycle driving cycle in Khon Kaen city, Thailand. IATSS Res2015; 39: 79–85.
32.
KhumlaPRadpukdeeTSatiennamT. Driving cycle generation for emissions and fuel consumption assessment of the motorcycles in Khon Kaen City. In: The first TSME international conference on mechanical engineering, Ubon Ratchathani, 20–22 October 2010. Thai Society of Mechanical Engineers (TSME).
33.
TongHYHungWT. A framework for developing driving cycles with on-road driving data. Trans Rev2010; 30(5): 589–615.
34.
Sze-HoWongYDChangVWC. Developing Singapore driving cycle for passenger cars to estimate fuel consumption and vehicular emissions. Atmosp Environ2014: 97: 353–362.
35.
KambleSHTomVMathewGK, et al. Development of real world driving cycle, case study of Pune, Indian. Transp Res D2009; 14: 132–140.
36.
SeedamASatiennamTRadpukdeeT, et al. Motorcycle on-road driving parameters influencing fuel consumption and emissions on congested signalized urban corridor. J Adv Transp2017; 2017: 5859789.
37.
FotouhiAMontazeriGM. An investigation on vehicle’s fuel comsumption and exhaust emissions in different driving conditions. Int J Environ Res2012; 6(1): 61–70.
38.
Montazeri-ChMFotouhiANaderpourA. Driving pattern clustering based on driving features analysis. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2017; 225(6): 1301–1317.
39.
SilvasEHereijgersKPengH, et al. Synthesis of realistic driving cycles with high accuracy and computational speed, including slope information. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2016; 65(6): 4118–4128.
40.
FriesMAlexandre WittmannM, et al. Derivation of a real-life driving cycle from fleet testing data with the Markov-Chain-Monte-Carlo Method. In: IEEE 21st International conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), Maui, HI, 4–7 November 2018. New York: IEEE.
41.
LiYPengJHeH, et al. The study on multi-scale prediction of future driving cycle based on Markov chain. Energy Proc2017; 105: 3219–3224.
42.
SatiennamTSeedamARadpukdeeT, et al. Development of on-road exhaust emission and fuel consumption models for motorcycles and application through traffic micro-simulation. J Adv Transp2017; 2017: 3958967.
43.
MahayadinARIbrahimIZunaidiI. Development of riving cycle construction methodology in Malaysia’s urban road system. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2018.
44.
KumarRDuraiBKSalehW, et al. Comparison and evaluation of emissions for different driving cycles of motorcycles: a note. Transp Res D Trans Environ Volume 2011; 16(1): 61–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2010.08.006.
45.
NesamaniKSChuLMcNallyMG, et al. Estimation of vehicular emissions by capturing traffic variations, TRB 2006 Annual Meeting, November 2005. Center for Activity Systems Analysis.
46.
Montazeri-GhMNaghizadehM. Development of car driving cycle for simulation of emissions and fuel economy. Energy Proc2003; 90: 238–244.
47.
ErgenemanMSorubayCGöktanA. Development of a driving cycle for the prediction of pollutant emissions and fuel consumption. Int J Veh Des1997; 18: 391–399.
48.
TongHYHungWTCheungCS. Development of a driving cycle for Hong Kong. Atmosp Environ1999; 33: 2323–2335.
49.
SakthivelPSubramanianKAMathaiR. Indian scenario of ethanol fuel and its utilization in automotive transportation sector. Resour Conserv Recycl2018; 132: 102–120.
50.
TuanALTuanMPTrueTN, et al. Measurements of emission factors and fuel consumption for motorcycles on a chassis dynamometer based on a localized driving cycle. Hanoi, Vietnam: School of Transportation Engineering, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, 2012.
51.
VasicAMWeilenmannM. Comparison of real-world emissions from two-wheelers and passenger cars. Environ Sci Technol2006; 40(1): 149–154.
52.
MuncriefR. NOX emissions from heavy-duty and light-duty diesel vehicles in the EU: comparison of real-world performance and current type-approval requirements. Washington, DC: International Council on Clean Transportation, 2016.
53.
BokarePSMauryaAK. Study of effect of speed, acceleration and deceleration of small petrol car on its tail pipe emissions. Int J Traffic Transp Eng2013; 3(4): 465–478.
54.
GoelRGuttikundaSK. Evolution of on-road vehicle exhaust emission in Delhi. Atmosp Environ2015; 105: 78–90.
KumarRParidaPDuraiBK, et al. How real-world driving cycle differs in heterogenous traffic conditions: a case study in Delhi. World J Sci Technol Sustainable Dev2013; 10(1): 68–80.
