To accurately predict the combustion and emissions characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with n-butanol/diesel blends, a more realistic compact-sized skeletal mechanism with (149 species and 497 reactions) was developed in this study based on the decoupling method. It was generated by integrating the simplified fuel-related sub-mechanisms of n-butanol and diesel surrogates including n-dodecane, iso-cetane, iso-octane, toluene, and decalin. The same detailed core sub-mechanisms of C2-C3 and H2/CO/C1, in which the formation and oxidation of benzene (A1) and larger polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) up to coronene (A7) of alkanes, aromatics, cycloalkanes and alcohols were used. The PAH formation behavior of individual fuel components in the mechanism were analyzed in detail based on the methods of pathway analysis, rate of production and sensitivity analysis. The mechanism was extensively validated against ignition delay time, laminar flame speed, species profile and three-dimensional engine simulation. The results show that the effects of fuel types on the PAH formation are satisfactorily captured, and the combustion characteristics of n-butanol/diesel blends and each component are reliably reproduced by the current mechanism.
MengZChenCLiJ, et al. Particle emission characteristics of DPF regeneration from DPF regeneration bench and diesel engine bench measurements. Fuel2020; 262: 116589.
2.
SzwajaSNaberJD.Combustion of n-butanol in a spark-ignition IC engine. Fuel2010; 89(7): 1573–1582.
3.
LujajiFBereczkyAJanosiL, et al. Cetane number and thermal properties of vegetable oil, biodiesel, 1-butanol and diesel blends. J Therm Anal Calorim2010; 102(3): 1175–1181.
4.
RakopoulosDCRakopoulosCDGiakoumisEG, et al. Effects of butanol–diesel fuel blends on the performance and emissions of a high-speed DI diesel engine. Energy Convers Manage2010; 51(10): 1989–1997.
5.
RakopoulosDCRakopoulosCDPapagiannakisRG, et al. Combustion heat release analysis of ethanol or n-butanol diesel fuel blends in heavy-duty DI diesel engine. Fuel2011; 90(5): 1855–1867.
6.
WangHReitzRDYaoM, et al. Development of an n-heptane-n-butanol-PAH mechanism and its application for combustion and soot prediction. Combust Flame2013; 160(3): 504–519.
7.
ZhouXSongMHuangH, et al. Numerical study of the formation of soot precursors during low-temperature combustion of an-butanol–diesel Blend. Energy Fuels2014; 28(11): 7149–7158.
8.
HuangHZhuJZhuZ, et al. Development and validation of a new reduced diesel-n-butanol blends mechanism for engine applications. Energy Convers Manage2017; 149: 553–563.
9.
LiYChenYWuG.A new skeletal mechanism for diesel-n-butanol blends combustion in engine. Fuel2020; 264: 116856.
10.
WangHYaoMReitzRD.Development of a reduced primary reference fuel mechanism for internal combustion engine combustion simulations. Energy Fuels2013; 27(12): 7843–7853.
11.
FarrellJTCernanskyNPDryerFL, et al. Development of an experimental database and kinetic models for surrogate diesel fuels. SAE technical paper 2007-01-0175, 2007.
12.
PitzWJMuellerCJ.Recent progress in the development of diesel surrogate fuels. Prog Energy Combust Sci2011; 37(3): 330–350.
13.
LuoJYaoMLiuH, et al. Experimental and numerical study on suitable diesel fuel surrogates in low temperature combustion conditions. Fuel2012; 97: 621–629.
14.
WeberJWonHPetersN. Experimental validation of a surrogate fuel for diesel. SAE technical paper 2007-01-1842, 2007.
15.
DongXChangYNiuB, et al. Development of a practical reaction model of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) formation and oxidation for diesel surrogate fuel. Fuel2020; 267: 117159.
16.
YuWZhaoFYangW, et al. Development of an optimization methodology for formulating both jet fuel and diesel fuel surrogates and their associated skeletal oxidation mechanisms. Fuel2018; 231: 361–372.
17.
VishwanathanGReitzRD.Modeling soot formation using reduced polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon chemistry in n-heptane lifted flames with application to low temperature combustion. J Eng Gas Turbine Power2009; 131(3): 032801.
18.
LuoJYaoMLiuH.A reduced chemical kinetic mechanism for low temperature diesel combustion and soot emissions. Combust Sci Technol2014; 186(12): 1975–1990.
19.
FrenklachMClaryDWGardinerWCJr, et al. Detailed kinetic modeling of soot formation in shock-tube pyrolysis of acetylene. Symp Int Combust1985; 20(1): 887–901.
20.
WangYRajAChungSH.Soot modeling of counterflow diffusion flames of ethylene-based binary mixture fuels. Combust Flame2015; 162(3): 586–596.
21.
RajAPradaIDCAmerAA, et al. A reaction mechanism for gasoline surrogate fuels for large polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Combust Flame2012; 159(2): 500–515.
22.
DworkinSBZhangQThomsonMJ, et al. Application of an enhanced PAH growth model to soot formation in a laminar coflow ethylene/air diffusion flame. Combust Flame2011; 158(9): 1682–1695.
23.
SlavinskayaNARiedelUDworkinSB, et al. Detailed numerical modeling of PAH formation and growth in non-premixed ethylene and ethane flames. Combust Flame2012; 159(3): 979–995.
24.
NiemeyerKESungCJRajuMP.Skeletal mechanism generation for surrogate fuels using directed relation graph with error propagation and sensitivity analysis. Combust Flame2010; 157(9): 1760–1770.
25.
LiGYangWTayKL, et al. A reduced and robust reaction mechanism for toluene and decalin oxidation with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon predictions. Fuel2020; 259: 116233.
26.
DagautPCathonnetM.The ignition, oxidation, and combustion of kerosene: a review of experimental and kinetic modeling. Prog Energy Combust Sci2006; 32(1): 48–92.
27.
FanWJiaMChangY, et al. Understanding the relationship between cetane number and the ignition delay in shock tubes for different fuels based on a skeletal primary reference fuel (n-hexadecane/iso-cetane) mechanism. Energy Fuels2015; 29(5): 3413–3427.
28.
StagniAFrassoldatiACuociA, et al. Skeletal mechanism reduction through species-targeted sensitivity analysis. Combust Flame2016; 163: 382–393.
29.
StagniACuociAFrassoldatiA, et al. Lumping and reduction of detailed kinetic schemes: an effective coupling. Ind Eng Chem Res2014; 53(22): 9004–9016.
30.
RanziEFrassoldatiAStagniA, et al. Reduced kinetic schemes of complex reaction systems: fossil and biomass-derived transportation fuels. Int J Chem Kinet2014; 46(9): 512–542.
31.
PejpichestakulWRanziEPelucchiM, et al. Examination of a soot model in premixed laminar flames at fuel-rich conditions. Proc Combust Inst2019; 37(1): 1013–1021.
32.
CurtisNJNiemeyerKESungCJ.An automated target species selection method for dynamic adaptive chemistry simulations. Combust Flame2015; 162(4): 1358–1374.
33.
ChangYJiaMXiaoJ, et al. Construction of a skeletal mechanism for butanol isomers based on the decoupling methodology. Energy Convers Manage2016; 128: 250–260.
34.
SarathySMVranckxSYasunagaK, et al. A comprehensive chemical kinetic combustion model for the four butanol isomers. Combust Flame2012; 159(6): 2028–2055.
35.
ChenBLiuXLiuH, et al. Soot reduction effects of the addition of four butanol isomers on partially premixed flames of diesel surrogates. Combust Flame2017; 177: 123–136.
36.
DongXJiaMChangY, et al. Kinetic modeling study of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon formation and oxidation for oxygenated fuels including Methanol, n-Butanol, Methyl Butanoate, and Dimethyl Ether. Energy Fuels2020; 34(4): 4882–4898.
37.
NakamuraHSuzukiSTezukaT, et al. Sooting limits and PAH formation of n-hexadecane and 2, 2, 4, 4, 6, 8, 8-heptamethylnonane in a micro flow reactor with a controlled temperature profile. Proc Combust Inst2015; 35(3): 3397–3404.
38.
WangHRaYJiaM, et al. Development of a reduced n-dodecane-PAH mechanism and its application for n-dodecane soot predictions. Fuel2014; 136: 25–36.
39.
ZhaoLSunWYangJ, et al. Revealing the doping effects of C2H6O isomers on a benzene flame: an experimental and modeling study. Combust Flame2018; 197: 355–368.
40.
ParkSWangYChungSH, et al. Compositional effects on PAH and soot formation in counterflow diffusion flames of gasoline surrogate fuels. Combust Flame2017; 178: 46–60.
41.
MatsugiAMiyoshiA.Modeling of two- and three-ring aromatics formation in the pyrolysis of toluene. Proc Combust Inst2013; 34(1): 269–277.
42.
FiewegerKBlumenthalRAdomeitG.Self-ignition of SI engine model fuels: a shock tube investigation at high pressure. Combust Flame1997; 109(4): 599–619.
43.
DavidsonDFGauthierBMHansonRK.Shock tube ignition measurements of iso-octane/air and toluene/air at high pressures. Proc Combust Inst2005; 30(1): 1175–1182.
44.
VasuSSDavidsonDFHongZ, et al. n-Dodecane oxidation at high-pressures: measurements of ignition delay times and OH concentration time-histories. Proc Combust Inst2009; 32(1): 173–180.
45.
HaylettDRDavidsonDFHansonRK.Ignition delay times of low-vapor-pressure fuels measured using an aerosol shock tube. Combust Flame2012; 159(2): 552–561.
46.
OehlschlaegerMASteinbergJWestbrookCK, et al. The autoignition of iso-cetane at high to moderate temperatures and elevated pressures: shock tube experiments and kinetic modeling. Combust Flame2009; 156(11): 2165–2172.
47.
ShenHPSVanderoverJOehlschlaegerMA.A shock tube study of the auto-ignition of toluene/air mixtures at high pressures. Proc Combust Inst2009; 32(1): 165–172.
48.
WestbrookCKPitzWJHerbinetO, et al. A comprehensive detailed chemical kinetic reaction mechanism for combustion of n-alkane hydrocarbons from n-octane to n-hexadecane. Combust Flame2009; 156(1): 181–199.
49.
GowdagiriSWangWOehlschlaegerMA.A shock tube ignition delay study of conventional diesel fuel and hydroprocessed renewable diesel fuel from algal oil. Fuel2014; 128: 21–29.
50.
HeuferKAFernandesRXOlivierH, et al. Shock tube investigations of ignition delays of n-butanol at elevated pressures between 770 and 1250 K. Proc Combust Inst2011; 33(1): 359–366.
51.
VranckxSHeuferKALeeC, et al. Role of peroxy chemistry in the high-pressure ignition of n-butanol–experiments and detailed kinetic modelling. Combust Flame2011; 158(8): 1444–1455.
52.
QiuYZhouWFengY, et al. An experimental and modeling study of autoignition characteristics of butanol/diesel blends over wide temperature ranges. Combust Flame2020; 217: 175–187.
53.
HuiXSungCJ.Laminar flame speeds of transportation-relevant hydrocarbons and jet fuels at elevated temperatures and pressures. Fuel2013; 109: 191–200.
54.
JiCDamesEWangYL, et al. Propagation and extinction of premixed C5–C12 n-alkane flames. Combust Flame2010; 157(2): 277–287.
55.
YangYBoehmanAL.Oxidation chemistry of cyclic hydrocarbons in a motored engine: methylcyclopentane, tetralin, and decalin. Combust Flame2010; 157(3): 495–505.
56.
JohnstonRFarrellJ.Laminar burning velocities and Markstein lengths of aromatics at elevated temperature and pressure. Proc Combust Inst2005; 30(1): 217–224.
57.
LiBZhangHEgolfopoulosFN.Laminar flame propagation of atmospheric iso-cetane/air and decalin/air mixtures. Combust Flame2014; 161(1): 154–161.
58.
LiuWKelleyAPLawCK. Non-premixed ignition, laminar flame propagation, and mechanism reduction of n-butanol, iso-butanol, and methyl butanoate. Proc Combust Inst2011; 33(1): 995–1002.
59.
BroustailGSeersPHalterF, et al. Experimental determination of laminar burning velocity for butanol and ethanol iso-octane blends. Fuel2011; 90(1): 1–6.
60.
ZhangXTangCYuH, et al. Laminar flame characteristics of iso-octane/n-butanol blend–air mixtures at elevated temperatures. Energy Fuels2013; 27(4): 2327–2335.
61.
DooleySWonSHHeyneJ, et al. The experimental evaluation of a methodology for surrogate fuel formulation to emulate gas phase combustion kinetic phenomena. Combust Flame2012; 159(4): 1444–1466.
62.
Mzé-AhmedAHadj-AliKDagautP, et al. Experimental and modeling study of the oxidation kinetics of n-undecane and n-dodecane in a jet-stirred reactor. Energy Fuels2012; 26(7): 4253–4268.
63.
DagautPHadj-AliK.Chemical kinetic study of the oxidation of isocetane (2, 2, 4, 4, 6, 8, 8-heptamethylnonane) in a jet-stirred reactor: experimental and modeling. Energy Fuels2009; 23(5): 2389–2395.
64.
ZengMWullenkordJGrafI, et al. Influence of dimethyl ether and diethyl ether addition on the flame structure and pollutant formation in premixed iso-octane flames. Combust Flame2017; 184: 41–54.
65.
LiYCaiJZhangL, et al. Investigation on chemical structures of premixed toluene flames at low pressure. Proc Combust Inst2011; 33(1): 593–600.
66.
TranLSPieperJZengM, et al. Influence of the biofuel isomers diethyl ether and n-butanol on flame structure and pollutant formation in premixed n-butane flames. Combust Flame2017; 175: 47–59.
67.
ZengMLiYYuanW, et al. Experimental and kinetic modeling study of laminar premixed decalin flames. Proc Combust Inst2017; 36(1): 1193–1202.
68.
SkeenSAYangBJasperAW, et al. Chemical structures of low-pressure premixed methylcyclohexane flames as benchmarks for the development of a predictive combustion chemistry model. Energy Fuels2011; 25(12): 5611–5625.
69.
GoodwinDG.An open-source, extensible software suite for CVD process simulation. Chem Vap Deposition XVI EUROCVD2003; 14(40): 2003–2008.
70.
FengX.Investigation of combustion and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with butanol-diesel blends. MS Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2011.
71.
JenniferCBRolfR.Modeling spray atomization with the Kelvin-Helmholtz/Rayleigh-Taylor hybrid model. Atomization Sprays1999; 9: 623–650.
72.
HanZReitzR.Turbulence modeling of internal combustion engines using RNG k-ε models. Combust Sci Technol1995; 106: 267–295.
73.
O’RourkePJ.Collective drop effects on vaporizing liquid sprays. Los Alamos National Lab, NM, USA, 1981.
74.
ZengYLeeCF.A preferential vaporization model for multicomponent droplets and sprays. Atomization Sprays2002; 12(1–3): 163–186.
75.
VishwanathanGReitzRD.Development of a practical soot modeling approach and its application to low-temperature diesel combustion. Combust Sci Technol2010; 182(8): 1050–1082.
