The purpose of this study is to explore the spray characteristics of aviation kerosene (RP-3) under sub/trans/supercritical conditions and provide a reference for engine test research under advanced combustion mode. The experiment is carried out in a constant volume chamber. To understand the influence of nozzle diameter and injection pressure on spray characteristics of RP-3 under different critical conditions, 270 groups of spray images are collected under three nozzle diameters (100, 300, 450 μm), five injection pressures (60, 80, 100, 120, 140 MPa), and nine critical conditions. The macroscopic parameters are calculated and new empirical correlations are generated to investigate the axial and radial development of spray. The results show that kerosene spray has different spray characteristics under sub/trans/supercritical conditions. The effect of nozzle diameter on kerosene spray is stronger than that of diesel spray. The spray with a small nozzle diameter is easily affected by gas entrainment. The injection pressure has an insignificant effect on spray macroscopic characteristics, but high injection pressure is conducive to increasing the vapor phase ratio and promoting oil-gas mixing, especially under supercritical conditions. The new correlations have good agreement with kerosene experimental results.
AnastopoulosGLoisEZannikosF, et al. HFRR lubricity response of an additized aviation kerosene for use in CI engines. Tribol Int2002; 35: 599–604.
2.
BatchelorGMosesCFletcherR. Impact Study on the Use of JET A Fuel in Military Aircraft during Operations in Europe (Etude de l'impact de l'utilisation du carburant JET A par les avions militaires lors des operations en Europe)[r]. FRANCE: ADVISORY GROUP FOR AEROSPACE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT NEUILLY-SUR-SEINE (FRANCE), 1997.
3.
MangusMMattsonJDepcikC.Performance and emissions characteristics of hydroprocessed renewable jet fuel blends in a single-cylinder compression ignition engine with electronically controlled fuel injection. Combust Sci Technol2015; 187: 857–873.
HooperPRAl-ShemmeriTGoodwinMJ.An experimental and analytical investigation of a multi-fuel stepped piston engine. Appl Therm Eng2012; 48: 32–40.
6.
BowdenJNWestbrookSRLePeraME.Jet kerosene fuels for military diesel application. SAE Trans1989; 98: 810–832.
7.
FernandesGFuschettoJFilipiZ, et al. Impact of military JP-8 fuel on heavy-duty diesel engine performance and emissions. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2007; 221: 957–970.
8.
PandeyAKNandgaonkarM.Performance, emission and pump wear analysis of jp-8 fuel for military use on a 558 kW, CIDI diesel engine. SAE Int J Fuel Lubricants2010; 3(2): 238–245.
9.
LeeJLeeJChuS, et al. Emission reduction potential in a light-duty diesel engine fueled by JP-8. Energy2015; 89: 92–99.
10.
LabeckasGSlavinskasSVilutieneV.Effect of the Cetane number improving additive on combustion, performance, and emissions of a DI diesel engine operating on JP-8 fuel. J Energy Eng2015; 141: 1–14.
11.
ChenLDingSLiuH, et al. Comparative study of combustion and emissions of kerosene (RP-3), kerosene-pentanol blends and diesel in a compression ignition engine. Appl Energy2017; 203: 91–100.
12.
YangWTayKLKongKW.Impact of various factors on the performance and emissions of diesel engine fueled by kerosene and its blend with diesel. Energy Proc2017; 142: 1564–1569.
13.
ChenLRazaMXiaoJ.Combustion analysis of an aviation compression ignition engine burning pentanol–kerosene blends under different injection timings. Energy Fuels2017; 31: 9429–9437.
14.
PickettLMHoogterpL.Fundamental spray and combustion measurements of JP-8 at diesel conditions. SAE Int J Commer Veh2008; 1: 108–118.
15.
LeeJBaeC.Application of JP-8 in a heavy duty diesel engine. Fuel2011; 90: 1762–1770.
16.
TessMKurmanMKweonCB.Spray characterization and ignition delay measurements of JP-8 and IPK in a constant-pressure flow chamber. SAE Int J Engines2016; 9(2): 899–909.
17.
BaiYWangYWangX, et al. Development of physical-chemical surrogate models and skeletal mechanism for the spray and combustion simulation of RP-3 kerosene fuels. Energy2021; 215: 119090.
18.
WuHZhangFZhangZ.Fundamental spray characteristics of air-assisted injection system using aviation kerosene. Fuel2021; 286: 119420.
19.
SongLLiuTFuW, et al. Experimental study on spray characteristics of ethanol-aviation kerosene blended fuel with a high-pressure common rail injection system. J Energ Inst2018; 91: 203–213.
20.
LiuTFuWYiB, et al. Experimental investigations of kerosene sprays in pressurized evaporating environments. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy2019; 233: 413–427.
21.
Kılkış KrajačićGDuićN, et al. Research frontiers in sustainable development of energy, water and environment systems in a time of climate crisis. Energy Convers Manag2019; 199: 111938.
22.
LinR.Issues on clean diesel combustion technology using supercritical fluids: Thermophysical properties and thermal stability of diesel fuel[M]. Syracuse University, 2011.
23.
ChehroudiBCohnRTalleyD.Cryogenic shear layers: experiments and phenomenological modeling of the initial growth rate under subcritical and supercritical conditions. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2002; 23: 554–563.
24.
WangCCaoJLongW.Design and application of an automatic extraction algorithm to evaluate diesel spray characteristics in supercritical environment. Appl Therm Eng2019; 159: 113975.
25.
XiaJHuangZXuL, et al. Experimental study on spray and atomization characteristics under subcritical, transcritical and supercritical conditions of marine diesel engine. Energy Convers Manag2019; 195: 958–971.
26.
XiaJZhangQHuangZ, et al. Experimental study of injection characteristics under diesel’s sub/trans/supercritical conditions with various nozzle diameters and injection pressures. Energy Convers Manag2020; 215: 112949.
27.
ZhangQXiaJHeZ, et al. Experimental study on spray characteristics of six-component diesel surrogate fuel under sub/trans/supercritical conditions with different injection pressures. Energy2021; 218: 119474.
28.
XiaJHuangZZhangL, et al. Experimental comparisons on injection and atomization characteristics of diesel and its six-component surrogate under different critical conditions of marine engine. Energy Convers Manag2020; 205: 112397.
29.
OschwaldMSmithJJBranamR, et al. Injection of fluids into supercritical environments. Combust Sci Technol2006; 178: 49–100.
30.
LiLXieMWeiW, et al. Numerical investigation on cryogenic liquid jet under transcritical and supercritical conditions. Cryogenics2018; 89: 16–28.
31.
LuYPanJFanB, et al. Research on the application of aviation kerosene in a direct injection rotary engine-part 1: fundamental spray characteristics and optimized injection strategies. Energy Convers Manag2019; 195: 519–532.
32.
LiHVerschaerenRBejiT, et al. Investigation of evaporating sprays in a medium speed marine engine. Exp Therm Fluid Sci2021; 121: 110278.
33.
LiBWangYLongW, et al. Experimental research on the effects of kerosene on the pre-injection spray characteristics and engine performance of dual-direct injection diesel jet controlled compression ignition mode. Fuel2020; 281: 118691.
34.
MusculusMPBMilesPCPickettLM.Conceptual models for partially premixed low-temperature diesel combustion. Prog Energy Combust Sci2013; 39: 246–283.
35.
ChenLLiGHuangD, et al. Experimental and numerical study on the initial tip structure evolution of diesel fuel spray under various injection and ambient pressures. Energy2019; 186: 115867.
36.
NiZHanKZhaoC, et al. Numerical simulation of droplet evaporation characteristics of multi-component acetone-butanol-ethanol and diesel blends under different environments. Fuel2018; 230: 27–36.
37.
Martí-AldaravíP. Development of a computational model for a simultaneous simulation of internal flow and spray break-up of the Diesel injection process[D]. Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia, 2014.
38.
DasSKLimOT.Spray simulation of n-heptane in a constant volume combustion chamber over a wide range of ambient Gas density and fuel temperature. Energy Proc2017; 105: 1813–1820.
39.
GimenoJBrachoGMartí-AldaravíP, et al. Experimental study of the injection conditions influence over n-dodecane and diesel sprays with two ECN single-hole nozzles. Part I: inert atmosphere. Energy Convers Manag2016; 126: 1146–1156.
40.
PayriFPayriRBardiM, et al. Engine combustion network: influence of the gas properties on the spray penetration and spreading angle. Exp Therm Fluid Sci2014; 53: 236–243.
41.
PayriRGimenoJBrachoG, et al. Study of liquid and vapor phase behavior on diesel sprays for heavy duty engine nozzles. Appl Therm Eng2016; 107: 365–378.
42.
XuMCuiYDengK.One-dimensional model on liquid-phase fuel penetration in diesel sprays. J Energ Inst2016; 89: 138–149.
43.
HiroyasuHAraiM.Structures of fuel sprays in diesel engines. SAE Trans1990; 99: 1050–1061.
44.
DentJC.A basis for the comparison of various experimental methods for studying spray penetration. SAE technical paper710571, 1971.
45.
YuWYangWTayK, et al. Macroscopic spray characteristics of kerosene and diesel based on two different piezoelectric and solenoid injectors. Exp Therm Fluid Sci2016; 76: 12–23.
46.
ChenBFengLWangY, et al. Spray and flame characteristics of wall-impinging diesel fuel spray at different wall temperatures and ambient pressures in a constant volume combustion vessel. Fuel2019; 235: 416–425.
