In order to solve the accuracy problem of the future motion prediction of the surrounding vehicles with different types of drivers, this paper proposes a comprehensive lateral motion prediction method that combines driver intention prediction and vehicle behavior recognition. For different drivers, different driver optimization models are established: personal optimal model and system optimal model. Then, the driver’s intention prediction probability is obtained through the game theory. Different from the traditional game theory, we apply different model for different driver on the premise of getting the type of driver instead of using the Nash equilibrium for all players. According to the results of driver intention prediction and the vehicle behavior recognition, the optimized polynomial trajectory is used to obtain the driver’s intention prediction trajectory and the vehicle behavior recognition trajectory. Next, the Nash-optimization function of the intention prediction trajectory and the behavior recognition trajectory are established respectively according to the trajectory error, and the balance between the two is our comprehensive trajectory. In order to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, we conducted simulations under mandatory lane changing and discretionary lane changing conditions. The simulation results show that our algorithm can accurately predict the future motion of the vehicle under different drivers, different speeds and different gaps between vehicles. Its prediction performance is much better than other algorithms.
AradiS.Survey of deep reinforcement learning for motion planning of autonomous vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2020; 2020: 1–20.
2.
MozaffariSAl-JarrahOYDianatiM, et al. Deep learning-based vehicle behavior prediction for autonomous driving applications: a review. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2022; 23: 33–47.
3.
ZhangXZhangWWuX, et al. Probabilistic trajectory prediction of heterogeneous traffic agents based on layered spatio-temporal graph. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2021; 235(7): 935--947.
4.
RasekhipourYKhajepourAChenSK, et al. A potential field-based model predictive path-planning controller for autonomous road vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2017; 18(5): 1255–1267.
5.
LygerosJGodboleDNSastryS. Verified hybrid controllers for automated vehicles. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on decision and control, Kobe, Japan, 1996, vol. 2, pp.2289–2294.
6.
KimCLangariR.Development of an autonomous vehicle highway merging strategy. Int J Veh Des2012; 60(3/4): 350–368.
7.
HedrickJK.Vehicle control issues in intelligent vehicle highway systems. IFAC Proc Volumes1995; 28(1): 195–202.
8.
TomizukaM.Advanced vehicle control systems (AVCS) research for automated highway systems in California PATH. In: Proceedings of VNIS'94 – 1994 vehicle navigation and information systems conference, Yokohama, Japan, 1994, pp.41–45.
9.
CampbellMEgerstedtMHowJP, et al. Autonomous driving in urban environments: approaches, lessons and challenges. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci2010; 368(1928): 4649–4672.
10.
RygułaA. Driving style identification method based on speed graph analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2009 international conference on biometrics and Kansei engineering (ICBAKE 2009), Cieszyn, Poland, 2009, pp.76–79.
11.
LiXWangWRoettingM.Estimating driver’s lane-change intent considering driving style and contextual traffic. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2019; 20(9): 3258–3271.
12.
SongR.Driver intention prediction using model-added Bayesian network. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2021; 235(5): 1236–1244.
13.
ZynerAWorrallSWardJ, et al. Long short term memory for driver intent prediction. In: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2017, pp.1484–1489.
14.
ZhangYLinQWangJ, et al. Lane-Change intention estimation for car-following control in autonomous driving. IEEE Trans Intell Vehicles2018; 3(3): 276–286.
15.
BenterkiABoukhniferMJudaletV, et al. Prediction of surrounding vehicles lane change intention using machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE international conference on intelligent data acquisition and advanced computing systems: technology and applications (IDAACS), Glasgow, 2019, vol. 2, pp.839–843.
16.
LeeKLiSEKumD.Synthesis of robust lane keeping systems: impact of controller and design parameters on system performance. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2019; 20: 3129–3141.
17.
WangXLuYKochharDS. MTS-DeepNet for lane change prediction. In: 2016 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2016, pp.4571–4578.
18.
DoshiAMemberSTrivediMM, et al. On the roles of eye gaze and head dynamics in predicting driver’s intent to change lanes. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2009; 10(3): 453–462.
19.
PentlandALiuA.Modeling and prediction of human behavior. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1999. pp.229–242.
20.
HouHJinLNiuQ, et al. Driver intention recognition method using continuous hidden Markov model. Int J Comput Intell Syst2011; 4(3): 386.
21.
MorrisBDoshiATrivediM. Lane change intent prediction for driver assistance: on-road design and evaluation. In: 2011 IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium, Baden-Baden, Germany, 2011, pp.895–901.
MoonSMoonIYiK.Design, tuning, and evaluation of a full-range adaptive cruise control system with collision avoidance. Control Eng Pract2009; 17: 442–455.
PolychronopoulosATsogasMAmditisAJ, et al. Sensor fusion for predicting vehicles’ path for collision avoidance systems. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2007; 8(3): 549–562.
26.
WangYLiuZZuoZ, et al. Trajectory planning and safety assessment of autonomous vehicles based on motion prediction and model predictive control. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2019; 68(9): 8546–8556.
27.
LiuJXiongHHuangH, et al. Probabilistic long-term vehicle trajectory prediction via driver awareness model. In: 2020 IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2019, pp.992–998.
28.
KimBYiK.Probabilistic and holistic prediction of vehicle states using sensor fusion for application to integrated vehicle safety systems. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2014; 15(5): 2178–2190.
29.
LiJMaHTomizukaM. Conditional generative neural system for probabilistic trajectory prediction. In: 2019 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Macao, China, 2019, pp.6150–6156.
30.
LeonhardtVWanielikG. Neural network for lane change prediction assessing driving situation, driver behavior and vehicle movement. In: 2017 IEEE 20th international conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), Yokohama, Japan, 2018, pp.1–6.
31.
CaiWHeGHuJ, et al. A comprehensive intention prediction method considering vehicle interaction. In: 2020 4th CAA international conference on vehicular control and intelligence (CVCI), Hangzhou, China, 2020, pp.204–209.
32.
MurpheyYLMiltonRKiliarisL.Driver’s style classification using jerk analysis. In: 2009 IEEE workshop on computational intelligence in vehicles and vehicular systems, Nashville, TN, USA, 2009, pp.23–28.
33.
JohnsonDATrivediMM. Driving style recognition using a smartphone as a sensor platform. In: 2011 14th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), Washington, DC, USA, 2011, pp.1609–1615.
34.
LiJP. Study on motion prediction of traffic vehicles for intelligent driving. Jilin University, Changchun, China, 2018.
35.
JiALevinsonD.Estimating the social Gap with a game theory model of lane changing. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2021; 22: 6320–6329.
36.
YooJLangariR.A predictive perception model and control strategy for collision-free autonomous driving. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2019; 20(11): 4078–4091.
37.
FabianiFGrammaticoS.Multi-Vehicle automated driving as a generalized mixed-integer potential game. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2020; 21(3): 1064–1073.
38.
ThiemannCTreiberMKestingA.Estimating acceleration and lane-changing dynamics from next generation simulation trajectory data. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board2008; 2088: 90–101.
39.
BahramMLawitzkyAFriedrichsJ, et al. A game-theoretic approach to replanning-aware interactive scene prediction and planning. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2016; 65(6): 3981–3992.
