In the paper, a novel framework for the control system of lateral obstacle avoidance (LOA), which is based on dynamic early warning for intelligent vehicles shared-driven by people and vehicles (IVSDPVs), is presented to perform LOA in dynamic conditions (e.g. the speed of obstacle vehicles changes). Firstly, to achieve the accurate warning of IVSDPVs and adjust that with dynamic intervention of the driver in dynamic conditions, a multi-level early warning algorithm based on fusion and complementarity of the critical safe distance and reciprocal of collision time is proposed. Moreover, the critical safe distance is obtained using a combination of longitudinal with lateral directions. Secondly, if the driver does not respond until the “Critical” level warning, the IVSDPVs is automatically taken over by the control strategy to conduct active LOA control. Thirdly, to overcome the parameters perturbation, that is, mass, cornering stiffness, and signal disturb, the robust control strategy is presented to achieve accurate trajectory tracking of LOA. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed control strategy is evaluated by testing on the Simulink/Trucksim platform to demonstrate the controller’s capability in obtaining accurate early warning and achieving LOA across various working conditions.
LiSEZhengYLiK, et al. Dynamical modeling and distributed control of connected and automated vehicles: challenges and opportunities. IEEE Intell Transp Syst Mag2017; 9(3): 46–58.
2.
Marina MartinezCHeuckeMWangFY, et al. Driving style recognition for intelligent vehicle control and advanced driver assistance: a survey. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2018; 19: 666–676.
3.
SongWYangYFuM, et al. Real-time obstacles detection and status classification for collision warning in a vehicle active safety system. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2018; 19(3): 758–773.
4.
XiangXQinWXiangB.Research on a dsrc-based rear-end collision warning model. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2014; 15(3): 1054–1065.
5.
LianYZhaoYHuL, et al. Longitudinal collision avoidance control of electric vehicles based on a new safety distance model and constrained-regenerative-braking-strength-continuity braking force distribution strategy. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2016; 65(6): 4079–4094.
6.
ChenMZhanXZhangX, et al. Localisation-based autonomous vehicle rear-end collision avoidance by emergency steering. IET Intell Transp Syst2019; 13(7): 1078–1087.
7.
YuanCWengSShenJ, et al. Research on active collision avoidance algorithm for intelligent vehicle based on improved artificial potential field model. Int J Adv Robot Syst2020; 17(3): 1–10.
8.
PotdarAGhodakeSA.A co-operative collision warning using WSN in a vehicular network. In: 2017 international conference on computing, communication, control and automation (ICCUBEA), Greater Noida, India, 2017.
9.
KalaivaniPKumarRPThrshanJ, et al. Smart collision avoidance and driver alert recognition (SCADAR) system. In: 2017 third international conference on sensing, signal processing and security (ICSSS), Chennai, India, 2017. IEEE.
10.
LeeDYeoH.Real-time rear-end collision-warning system using a multilayer perceptron neural network. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2016; 17(11): 3087–3097.
11.
YangWZhaoHHongS.Simulation and verification of control strategies for AEB pedestrian collision avoidance system. J Chongqing Univ2019; 42(2): 5–14.
12.
ShimTAdireddyGYuanH.Autonomous vehicle collision avoidance system using path planning and model-predictive-control-based active front steering and wheel torque control. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2012; 226(6): 767–778.
13.
YouFZhangRLieG, et al. Trajectory planning and tracking control for autonomous lane change maneuver based on the cooperative vehicle infrastructure system. Expert Syst Appl2015; 42(14): 5932–5946.
14.
GaoYLinTBorrelliF, et al. Predictive control of autonomous ground vehicles with obstacle avoidance on slippery roads. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2010 dynamic systems and control conference, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2010, pp.265–272.
15.
JiJKhajepourAMelekWW, et al. Path planning and tracking for vehicle collision avoidance based on model predictive control with multiconstraints. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2017; 66(2): 952–964.
16.
ShahJBestMBenmimounA, et al. Autonomous rear-end collision avoidance using an electric power steering system. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2015; 229(12): 1638–1655.
17.
LiXGuoZSuD, et al. Time-dependent lane change trajectory optimisation considering comfort and efficiency for lateral collision avoidance. IET Intell Transp Syst2021; 15(5): 595–605.
18.
SunCZhangXZhouQ, et al. A model predictive controller with switched tracking error for autonomous vehicle path tracking. IEEE Access2019; 7: 53103–53114.
19.
FunkeJChristian GerdesJ.Simple clothoid lane change trajectories for automated vehicles incorporating friction constraints. J Dyn Syst Meas Control2016; 138(2): 1–9.
20.
SoudbakhshDEskandarianAChichkaD.Vehicle collision avoidance maneuvers with limited lateral acceleration using optimal trajectory control. J Dyn Syst Meas Control2013; 135: 41006/1–41006/12.
21.
HeXLiuYLvC, et al. Emergency steering control of autonomous vehicle for collision avoidance and stabilisation. Veh Syst Dyn2019; 57: 1163–1187.
22.
CuiQDingRWuX, et al. A new strategy for rear-end collision avoidance via autonomous steering and differential braking in highway driving. Veh Syst Dyn2020; 58(6): 955–986.
23.
GaoYGordonTLidbergM.Optimal control of brakes and steering for autonomous collision avoidance using modified Hamiltonian algorithm. Veh Syst Dyn2019; 57(8): 1224–1240.
24.
WangPChanC.Vehicle collision prediction at intersections based on comparison of minimal distance between vehicles and dynamic thresholds. IET Intell Transp Syst2017; 11(10): 676–684.
25.
HanICLuanBCHsiehFC. Development of autonomous emergency braking control system based on road friction. In: IEEE international conference on automation science and engineering, Taipei, Taiwan, 2014, pp.933–937. IEEE.
26.
HanJHeoOParkM, et al. Vehicle distance estimation using a mono-camera for FCW/AEB systems. Int J Autom Technol2016; 17(3): 483–491.
27.
HuangLQ.Research on vehicle active collision avoidance control system based on longitudinal braking/steering lane-changing. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016.
28.
LiuZQZhangTWangYF.Research on local dynamic path planning method for intelligent vehicle lane-changing. J Adv Transport2019; 2019: 1–10.
29.
JulaHKosmatopoulosEBIoannouPA.Collision avoidance analysis for lane changing and merging. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2000; 49(6): 2295–2308.
30.
KanarisAKosmatopoulosEBLoannouPA.Strategies and spacing requirements for lane changing and merging in automated highway systems. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2001; 50(6): 1568–1581.
31.
NieZLiZWangW, et al. Gain-scheduling control of dynamic lateral lane change for automated and connected vehicles based on the multipoint preview. IET Intell Transp Syst2020; 14(10): 1338–1349.
32.
SharpRSValtetsiotisV.Optimal preview car steering control. Veh Syst Dyn2001; 35(Suppl): 101–157.
33.
GuDPetkoPHKonstantinovMM, et al. Robust control design with MATLAB. London: Springer London, 2005.
34.
LianYWangXTianY, et al. Lateral collision avoidance robust control of electric vehicles combining a lane-changing model based on vehicle edge turning trajectory and a vehicle semi-uncertainty dynamic model. Int J Autom Technol2018; 19(2): 331–343.
35.
VallOMM. Mixed sensitivity control for LTI systems with varying time delays. J Syst Eng Electronics2018; 29(3): 171–177.
