Model-based approaches have played a significant role in automotive electronics for diesel engines and aftertreatment systems, while they also have some drawbacks that cannot be neglected, such as difficult model construction and time-consuming model calibration. To this end, data-driven techniques have been put forward and become a topical issue in diesel engines and aftertreatment systems. This article provides an overview of the recent progress of the last decade in data-driven techniques and relevant applications for diesel engines and aftertreatment systems. Moreover, brief future trends, challenges, and opportunities of data-driven strategies and potential applications in this field are further discussed.
XuLBaiXSJiaM, et al. Experimental and modeling study of liquid fuel injection and combustion in diesel engines with a common rail injection system. Appl Energy2018; 230: 287–304.
2.
JiangKCaoEWeiL.NOx sensor ammonia cross-sensitivity estimation with adaptive unscented kalman filter for diesel-engine selective catalytic reduction systems. Fuel2016; 165: 185–192.
3.
ChenPWangJ.Nonlinear model predictive control of integrated diesel engine and selective catalytic reduction system for simultaneous fuel economy improvement and emissions reduction. J Dyn Syst Meas Control2015; 137(8): 081008.
4.
YinSLiXGaoH, et al. Data-based techniques focused on modern industry: an overview. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2015; 62(1): 657–667.
5.
YinSDingSXXieX, et al. A review on basic data-driven approaches for industrial process monitoring. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2014; 61(11): 6418–6428.
6.
GeZ.Review on data-driven modeling and monitoring for plant-wide industrial processes. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst2017; 171: 16–25.
7.
ZhongHZhuoW.From model-based control to data-driven control: survey, classification and perspective. Inform Sci2013; 235: 3–35.
8.
GeZSongZDingSX, et al. Data mining and analytics in the process industry: the role of machine learning. IEEE Access2017; 5: 20590–20616.
9.
ZamboniGMoggiaSCapobiancoM.Hybrid EGR and turbocharging systems control for low NOx and fuel consumption in an automotive diesel engine. Appl energy2016; 165: 839–848.
10.
GuoJGeYHaoL, et al. Comparison of real-world fuel economy and emissions from parallel hybrid and conventional diesel buses fitted with selective catalytic reduction systems. Appl Energy2015; 159: 433–441.
11.
WangJ.Energy consumption and tailpipe emission reductions by personalized control of connected vehicles. Mech Eng Magazine2017; 139(9): S5–S11.
12.
YaoYGaoF.A survey on multistage/multiphase statistical modeling methods for batch processes. Annu Rev Control2009; 33: 172–183.
13.
NorNMHassanCRCHussainMA.A review of data-driven fault detection and diagnosis methods: applications in chemical process systems. Rev Chem Eng2020; 36(4): 513–553.
14.
GengXXieL.Data-driven decision making in power systems with probabilistic guarantees: theory and applications of chance-constrained optimization. Annu Rev Control2019; 47: 341–363.
15.
AmasyaliKEl-GoharyNM.A review of data-driven building energy consumption prediction studies. Renew Sustain Energ Rev2018; 81: 1192–1205.
16.
DongYQinSJ.A novel dynamic PCA algorithm for dynamic data modeling and process monitoring. J Process Control2018; 67: 1–11.
17.
ZhuJGeZSongZ.Distributed parallel PCA for modeling and monitoring of large-scale plant-wide processes with big data. IEEE Trans Ind Inform2017; 13(4): 1877–1885.
18.
WangD.Robust data-driven modeling approach for real-time final product quality prediction in batch process operation. IEEE Trans Ind Inform2011; 7(2): 371–377.
19.
LiGLiuBQinSJ, et al. Quality relevant data-driven modeling and monitoring of multivariate dynamic processes: the dynamic T-PLS approach. IEEE Trans Neural Netw2011; 22(12): 2262–2271.
20.
WangGYinS.Quality-related fault detection approach based on orthogonal signal correction and modified PLS. IEEE Trans Ind Inform2015; 11(2): 398–405.
21.
LuXFanBHuangM.A novel LS-SVM modeling method for a hydraulic press forging process with multiple localized solutions. IEEE Trans Ind Inform2015; 11(3): 663–670.
22.
FanBLuXLiHX.Probabilistic inference-based least squares support vector machine for modeling under noisy environment. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst2016; 46(12): 1703–1710.
23.
AthavaleJYodaMJoshiY.Comparison of data driven modeling approaches for temperature prediction in data centers. Int J Heat Mass Transf2019; 135: 1039–1052.
24.
ZhongZDZhuXJCaoGY.Modeling a PEMFC by a support vector machine. J Power Sources2006; 160: 293–298.
25.
WuXJHuangQZhuXJ.Thermal modeling of a solid oxide fuel cell and micro gas turbine hybrid power system based on modified LS-SVM. Int J Hydrogen Energy2011; 36(1): 885–892.
26.
SolomatineDSeeLMAbrahartR.Data-driven modelling: concepts, approaches and experiences. In: AbrahartRJSeeLMSolomatineDP (eds) Practical hydroinformatics. Water science and technology library. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2009, pp.17–30.
27.
ZhuBChenMYWadeN, et al. A prediction model for wind farm power generation based on fuzzy modeling. Procedia Environ Sci2012; 12: 122–129.
28.
AhnKKAnhHPH. Inverse double NARX fuzzy modeling for system identification. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2010; 15(1): 136–148.
HuZChanCW.In-situ bioremediation for petroleum contamination: a fuzzy rule-based model predictive control system. Eng Appl Artif Intell2015; 38: 70–78.
31.
OluguEUWongKY.An expert fuzzy rule-based system for closed-loop supply chain performance assessment in the automotive industry. Expert Syst Appl2012; 39(1): 375–384.
32.
BaruaAKhorasaniK.Hierarchical fault diagnosis and fuzzy rule-based reasoning for satellites formation flight. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst2011; 47(4): 2435–2456.
33.
DingSLiHSuC, et al. Evolutionary artificial neural networks: a review. Artif Intell Rev2013; 39(3): 251–260.
34.
ZhangHCuiLZhangX, et al. Data-driven robust approximate optimal tracking control for unknown general nonlinear systems using adaptive dynamic programming method. IEEE Trans Neural Netw2011; 22(12): 2226–2236.
35.
MortonJWheelerTAKochenderferMJ.Analysis of recurrent neural networks for probabilistic modeling of driver behavior. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2017; 18(5): 1289–1298.
36.
MaXTaoZWangY, et al. Long short-term memory neural network for traffic speed prediction using remote microwave sensor data. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol2015; 54: 187–197.
37.
YuZHaghighatFFungBCM, et al. A decision tree method for building energy demand modeling. Energy Build2010; 42(10): 1637–1646.
38.
TsoGKFYauKKW. Predicting electricity energy consumption: a comparison of regression analysis, decision tree and neural networks. Energy2007; 32(9): 1761–1768.
39.
IbrahimIAKhatibT.A novel hybrid model for hourly global solar radiation prediction using random forests technique and firefly algorithm. Energy Convers Manag2017; 138: 413–425.
40.
MatinSSChelganiSC.Estimation of coal gross calorific value based on various analyses by random forest method. Fuel2016; 177: 274–278.
41.
WuXShenJLiY, et al. Data-driven modeling and predictive control for boiler–turbine unit. IEEE Trans Energy Convers2013; 28(3): 470–481.
42.
CorbettBMhaskarP.Subspace identification for data-driven modeling and quality control of batch processes. AIChE J2016; 62(5): 1581–1601.
43.
XiongRSunFChenZ, et al. A data-driven multi-scale extended kalman filtering based parameter and state estimation approach of lithium-ion polymer battery in electric vehicles. Appl Energy2014; 113: 463–476.
44.
XiongRSunFGongX, et al. A data-driven based adaptive state of charge estimator of lithium-ion polymer battery used in electric vehicles. Appl Energy2014; 113: 1421–1433.
45.
HuCJainGZhangP, et al. Data-driven method based on particle swarm optimization and k-nearest neighbor regression for estimating capacity of lithium-ion battery. Appl Energy2014; 129: 49–55.
46.
WangYYangDZhangX, et al. Probability based remaining capacity estimation using data-driven and neural network model. J Power Sources2016; 315: 199–208.
47.
AntoniouCKoutsopoulosHNYannisG.Dynamic data-driven local traffic state estimation and prediction. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol2013; 34: 89–107.
48.
LoutasTHRouliasDGeorgoulasG.Remaining useful life estimation in rolling bearings utilizing data-driven probabilistic e-support vectors regression. IEEE Trans Reliab2013; 62(4): 821–832.
49.
NajehTBen NjimaCGarnaT, et al. Input fault detection and estimation using PI observer based on the ARX-Laguerre model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2017; 90: 1317–1336.
50.
YuanSWuHYinC.State of charge estimation using the extended Kalman filter for battery management systems based on the ARX battery model. Energies2013; 6: 444–470.
51.
ChenKYuJ.Short-term wind speed prediction using an unscented Kalman filter based state-space support vector regression approach. Appl Energy2014; 113(6): 690–705.
52.
JiangKHuCYanF, et al. Inlet NO and NH3 concentration estimation for diesel-engine SCR systems by combining data-driven model and unbiased FIR filter. IFAC-PapersOnLine2018; 51(31): 314–318.
53.
YinSDingSXHaghaniA, et al. A comparison study of basic data-driven fault diagnosis and process monitoring methods on the benchmark Tennessee Eastman process. J Process Control2012; 22(9): 1567–1581.
54.
DaiXGaoZ.From model, signal to knowledge: a data-driven perspective of fault detection and diagnosis. IEEE Trans Ind Inform2013; 9(4): 2226–2238.
55.
OdgaardPFJorgensenSB.Observer and data-driven-model-based fault detection in power plant coal mills. IEEE Trans Energy Convers2008; 23(2): 659–668.
56.
WenLLiXGaoL, et al. A new convolutional neural network-based data-driven fault diagnosis method. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2018; 65(7): 5990–5998.
57.
YanKShenWMulumbaT, et al. ARX model based fault detection and diagnosis for chillers using support vector machines. Energy Build2014; 81: 287–295.
58.
GanNSunZZhangZ, et al. Data-driven fault diagnosis of lithium-ion battery overdischarge in electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Power Electron2022; 37(4): 4575–4588.
59.
ChenglinZXuebinSSonglinS, et al. Fault diagnosis of sensor by chaos particle swarm optimization algorithm and support vector machine. Expert Syst Appl2011; 38(8): 9908–9912.
60.
SimaniSFarsoniSCastaldiP.Fault diagnosis of a wind turbine benchmark via identified fuzzy models. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2015; 62(6): 3775–3782.
61.
BeghiABrignoliRCecchinatoL, et al. Data-driven fault detection and diagnosis for HVAC water chillers. Control Eng Pract2016; 53: 79–91.
62.
YinSHuangZ.Performance monitoring for vehicle suspension system via fuzzy positivistic c-means clustering based on accelerometer measurements. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2015; 20(5): 2613–2620.
63.
ChaiYPengXXuL, et al. Research on fault diagnosis of marine diesel engine based on kernel principal component analysis-fuzzy c-means clustering. J Comput Theor Nanosci2012; 11(1): 566–569.
64.
HuDSaroshADongYF.A novel KFCM based fault diagnosis method for unknown faults in satellite reaction wheels. ISA Trans2012; 51(2): 309–316.
65.
DouDZhouS.Comparison of four direct classification methods for intelligent fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. Appl Soft Comput2016; 46: 459–468.
66.
YanKJiZLuH, et al. Fast and accurate classification of time series data using extended ELM: application in fault diagnosis of air handling units. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst2019; 49(7): 1349–1356.
67.
HouZChiRGaoH.An overview of dynamic-linearization-based data-driven control and applications. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2017; 64(5): 4076–4090.
68.
AumiSCorbettBMhaskarP, et al. Data-based modeling and control of nylon-6, 6 batch polymerization. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2013; 21(1): 94–106.
69.
GeSSLiZYangH.Data driven adaptive predictive control for holonomic constrained under-actuated biped robots. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2012; 20(3): 787–795.
70.
XiaofangYYaonanWLianghongW.SVM-based approximate model control for electronic throttle valve. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2008; 57(5): 2747–2756.
71.
WeiQLiuD.Data-driven neuro-optimal temperature control of water–gas shift reaction using stable iterative adaptive dynamic programming. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2014; 61(11): 6399–6408.
72.
HouZJinS.A novel data-driven control approach for a class of discrete-time nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2011; 19(6): 1549–1558.
73.
HouZJinS.Data-driven model-free adaptive control for a class of MIMO nonlinear discrete-time systems. IEEE Trans Neural Netw2011; 22(12): 2173–2188.
74.
JanssensPPipeleersGSweversJ.A data-driven constrained norm-optimal iterative learning control framework for LTI systems. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2013; 21(2): 546–551.
75.
ChiRLiuXZhangR, et al. Constrained data-driven optimal iterative learning control. J Process Control2017; 55: 10–29.
76.
HouZLiuSTianT.Lazy-learning-based data-driven model-free adaptive predictive control for a class of discrete-time nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst2017; 28(8): 1914–1928.
77.
ArulkumaranKDeisenrothMPBrundageM, et al. Deep reinforcement learning: a brief survey. IEEE Signal Process Mag2017; 34(6): 26–38.
78.
BenatzkyCStadlbauerSFormentinS, et al. Indicated pressure-based data-driven diesel engine nox modeling. Int J Engine Res2014; 15(8): 934–943.
79.
YusafTFButtsworthDRSalehKH, et al. CNG-diesel engine performance and exhaust emission analysis with the aid of artificial neural network. Appl Energy2010; 87(5): 1661–1669.
80.
NiuXYangCWangH, et al. Investigation of ANN and SVM based on limited samples for performance and emissions prediction of a CRDI-assisted marine diesel engine. Appl Therm Eng2017; 111: 1353–1364.
81.
TaghavifarHKhalilaryaSJafarmadarS.Diesel engine spray characteristics prediction with hybridized artificial neural network optimized by genetic algorithm. Energy2014; 71: 656–664.
82.
RoySBanerjeeRBosePK.Performance and exhaust emissions prediction of a CRDI assisted single cylinder diesel engine coupled with EGR using artificial neural network. Appl Energy2014; 119: 330–340.
83.
DhahadHAHasanAMChaichanMT, et al. Prognostic of diesel engine emissions and performance based on an intelligent technique for nanoparticle additives. Energy2022; 238: 121855.
84.
GünerEKaleliABakirciK, et al. Development of optimal diesel injection strategy based on the prediction of performance and emissions using deep neural network. Int J Engine Res. Epub ahead of print 22November2021. DOI: 10.1177/14680874211057756.
85.
YuYWangYLiJ, et al. A novel deep learning approach to predict the instantaneous NO? emissions from diesel engine. IEEE Access2021; 9: 11002–11013.
86.
PeralezJGaluppoFDufourP, et al. Data-driven multi-model control for a waste heat recovery system. In: 2020 59th IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC), Jeju, South Korea, 14–18 December 2020, pp.5501–5506. New York, NY: IEEE.
87.
Pulpeiro GonzálezJAnkobea-AnsahKPengQ, et al. On the integration of physics-based and data-driven models for the prediction of gas exchange processes on a modern diesel engine. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering2022; 236(5): 857–871.
88.
GrahnMJohanssonKVartiaC, et al. A structure and calibration method for data-driven modeling of nox and soot emissions from a diesel engine. SAE technical paper, 2012.
89.
GrahnMJohanssonKMcKelveyT.Data-driven emission model structures for diesel engine management system development. Int J Engine Res2014; 15(8): 906–917.
90.
ArsieICricchioADe CesareM, et al. Least square adaptation of a fast diesel engine NO x emissions model. IFAC-PapersOnLine2017; 50(1): 8895–8900.
91.
BenzMOnderCHGuzzellaL.Engine emission modeling using a mixed physics and regression approach. J Eng Gas Turbine Power2010; 132(4): 042803.
92.
TanQDivekarPSTanY, et al. Pressure sensor data-driven optimization of combustion phase in a diesel engine. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2020; 25(2): 694–704.
93.
NorouziAAliramezaniMKochCR.A correlation-based model order reduction approach for a diesel engine nox and brake mean effective pressure dynamic model using machine learning. Int J Engine Res2021; 22(8): 2654–2672.
94.
LiuBHuJYanF, et al. A novel optimal support vector machine ensemble model for nox emissions prediction of a diesel engine. Measurement2016; 92: 183–192.
JohriRSalviAFilipiZ.Real-time transient soot and nox virtual sensors for diesel engine using neuro-fuzzy model tree and orthogonal least squares. J Eng Gas Turbine Power2012; 134(9): 092806.
97.
GhobadianBRahimiHNikbakhtAM, et al. Diesel engine performance and exhaust emission analysis using waste cooking biodiesel fuel with an artificial neural network. Renew Energy2009; 34(4): 976–982.
98.
Piloto-RodríguezRSánchez-BorrotoYLapuertaM, et al. Prediction of the cetane number of biodiesel using artificial neural networks and multiple linear regression. Energy Convers Manag2013; 65: 255–261.
99.
Tuan HoangANižetićSChyuan OngH, et al. A review on application of artificial neural network (ann) for performance and emission characteristics of diesel engine fueled with biodiesel-based fuels. Sustain Energy Technol Assess2021; 47: 101416.
100.
Mohamed IsmailHNgHKQueckCW, et al. Artificial neural networks modelling of engine-out responses for a light-duty diesel engine fuelled with biodiesel blends. Appl Energy2012; 92: 769–777.
101.
Böyükdipi TüccarGSoyhanHS. Experimental investigation and artificial neural networks (ANNs) based prediction of engine vibration of a diesel engine fueled with sunflower biodiesel – NH3 mixtures. Fuel2021; 304: 121462.
102.
SilitongaASMasjukiHHOngHC, et al. Evaluation of the engine performance and exhaust emissions of biodiesel-bioethanol-diesel blends using kernel-based extreme learning machine. Energy2018; 159: 1075–1087.
103.
WongKIWongPKCheungCS, et al. Modeling and optimization of biodiesel engine performance using advanced machine learning methods. Energy2013; 55: 519–528.
104.
SvärdCNybergMFriskE, et al. Automotive engine FDI by application of an automated model-based and data-driven design methodology. Control Eng Pract2013; 21(4): 455–472.
105.
SvärdCNybergMFriskE, et al. Data-driven and adaptive statistical residual evaluation for fault detection with an automotive application. Mech Syst Signal Process2014; 45(1): 170–192.
106.
PorteiroJCollazoJPatiñoD, et al. Diesel engine condition monitoring using a multi-net neural network system with nonintrusive sensors. Appl Therm Eng2011; 31(17–18): 4097–4105.
107.
LiuBZhaoCZhangF, et al. Misfire detection of a turbocharged diesel engine by using artificial neural networks. Appl Therm Eng2013; 55(1–2): 26–32.
108.
KowalskiJKrawczykBWoźniakM.Fault diagnosis of marine 4-stroke diesel engines using a one-vs-one extreme learning ensemble. Eng Appl Artif Intell2017; 57: 134–141.
109.
XiWLiZTianZ, et al. A feature extraction and visualization method for fault detection of marine diesel engines. Measurement2018; 116: 429–437.
110.
YinGZhangYTLiZN, et al. Online fault diagnosis method based on incremental support vector data description and extreme learning machine with incremental output structure. Neurocomputing2014; 128: 224–231.
111.
AntoryD.Application of a data-driven monitoring technique to diagnose air leaks in an automotive diesel engine: a case study. Mech Syst Signal Process2007; 21(2): 795–808.
112.
LiuYZhangJMaL.A fault diagnosis approach for diesel engines based on self-adaptive WVD, improved FCBF and PECOC-RVM. Neurocomputing2016; 177: 600–611.
113.
SubrahmanyaNShinYCMecklPH.A Bayesian machine learning method for sensor selection and fusion with application to on-board fault diagnostics. Mech Syst Signal Process2010; 24(1): 182–192.
114.
Diez-OlivanAPaganJASanzR, et al. Data-driven prognostics using a combination of constrained k-means clustering, fuzzy modeling and lof-based score. Neurocomputing2017; 241: 97–107.
115.
FlettJBoneGM.Fault detection and diagnosis of diesel engine valve trains. Mech Syst Signal Process2016; 72–73: 316–327.
116.
AranVUnelM.Diesel engine airpath controller via data driven disturbance observer. Int J Autom Technol2020; 21(4): 971–980.
117.
LiLTiexiongSMaF, et al. Research on a small sample fault diagnosis method for a high-pressure common rail system. Adv Mech Eng2021; 13(9): 16878140211046103.
118.
YangFChoHZhangH, et al. Artificial neural network (ANN) based prediction and optimization of an organic rankine cycle (ORC) for diesel engine waste heat recovery. Energy Convers Manag2018; 164: 15–26.
119.
OmranRYounesRChampoussinJC.Optimal control of a variable geometry turbocharged diesel engine using neural networks: applications on the ETC test cycle. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2009; 17(2): 380–393.
120.
EtghaniMMShojaeefardMHKhalkhaliA, et al. A hybrid method of modified NSGA-II and TOPSIS to optimize performance and emissions of a diesel engine using biodiesel. Appl Therm Eng2013; 59(1–2): 309–315.
121.
TianHLuZWangX, et al. A length ratio based neural network energy management strategy for online control of plug-in hybrid electric city bus. Appl Energy2016; 177: 71–80.
122.
PengQHuoDHallCM.Neural network-based air handling control for modern diesel engines. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering. Epub ahead of print 10March2022. DOI: 10.1177/09544070221083367.
123.
LiYJiaMHanX, et al. Towards a comprehensive optimization of engine efficiency and emissions by coupling artificial neural network (ann) with genetic algorithm (ga). Energy2021; 225: 120331.
124.
KeCHanKHuangY, et al. Neural network based nonlinear model predictive control for two-stage turbocharged diesel engine air-path system. In: 2021 33rd Chinese control and decision conference (CCDC), Kunming, China, 22–24May2021, pp.5770–5774. New York, NY: IEEE.
125.
Henry de FrahanMTWimerNTYellapantulaS, et al. Deep reinforcement learning for dynamic control of fuel injection timing in multi-pulse compression ignition engines. Int J Engine Res. Epub ahead of print 24May2021. DOI: 10.1177/14680874211019345.
126.
HofstetterJBauerHLiW, et al. Energy and emission management of hybrid electric vehicles using reinforcement learning. IFAC-PapersOnLine2019; 52(29): 19–24.
127.
HuBLiJLiS, et al. A hybrid end-to-end control strategy combining dueling deep q-network and PID for transient boost control of a diesel engine with variable geometry turbocharger and cooled EGR. Energies2019; 12(19): 3739.
128.
HuBLiJ.Shifting deep reinforcement learning algorithm toward training directly in transient real-world environment: a case study in powertrain control. IEEE Trans Ind Inform2021; 17(12): 8198–8206.
129.
XuBLiX.A q-learning based transient power optimization method for organic rankine cycle waste heat recovery system in heavy duty diesel engine applications. Appl Energy2021; 286: 116532.
130.
NiuXWangHHuS, et al. Multi-objective online optimization of a marine diesel engine using NSGA-II coupled with enhancing trained support vector machine. Appl Therm Eng2018; 137: 218–227.
131.
WongPKWongKIVongCM, et al. Modeling and optimization of biodiesel engine performance using kernel-based extreme learning machine and cuckoo search. Renew Energy2015; 74: 640–647.
132.
FormentinSHirschMSavaresiSM, et al. Direct data-driven control of a diesel engine airpath. In: 2012 American control conference (ACC), Montreal, QC, 27–29 June 2012, pp.4198–4203. New York, NY: IEEE.
133.
MilaneseMGerleroINovaraC, et al. Nonlinear mimo data-driven control design for the air and charging systems of diesel engines. SAE Technical Paper Series, 2015.
134.
VendittiM.Analysis of the performance of different machine learning techniques for the definition of rule-based control strategies in a parallel HEV. Energy Proc2016; 101: 685–692.
135.
ZhangHWangJ.Improved NO and NO2 concentration estimation for a diesel-engine-aftertreatment system. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2018; 23(1): 190–199.
136.
JiangKZhangHLinJ.NH3coverage ratio estimation of diesel-engine SCR systems by a dual time-scale extended Kalman filter. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2018; 67(4): 3625–3629.
137.
StadlbauerSWaschlHdel ReL. Black box SCR modeling and control for small ci engines. IFAC-PapersOnLine2016; 49(11): 28–33.
138.
StevensASunYLianJ, et al. Optimal SCR control using data-driven models. Technical report. SAE technical paper, 2013.
139.
IrfanMFMjalliFSKimSD.Modeling of NH3–NO–SCR reaction over Cuo/γ-Al2O3 catalyst in a bubbling fluidized bed reactor using artificial intelligence techniques. Fuel2012; 93: 245–251.
140.
SarkarBGundlapallySRKoutsivitisP, et al. Performance evaluation of neural networks in modeling exhaust gas aftertreatment reactors. Chem Eng J2022; 433: 134366.
141.
FaghihiEMShamekhiAH.Development of a neural network model for selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalytic converter and ammonia dosing optimization using multi objective genetic algorithm. Chem Eng J2010; 165(2): 508–516.
142.
ZhangSMTianFRenGF, et al. SCR control strategy based on ANNs and fuzzy PID in a heavy-duty diesel engine. Int J Autom Technol2012; 13(5): 693–699.
143.
MeierjurgenKHarriesBCompereM, et al. Sensorless selective catalytic reduction using artificial neural networks for emissions prediction with fuzzy logic control. In: ASME 2013 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, 2013, p.V04AT04A015. New York, NY: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
144.
SuiWHallCM.SCR control system design based on on-line radial basis function and backpropagation neural networks. In: ASME 2017 dynamic systems and control conference, 2017, p.V003T34A002. New York, NY: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
145.
DiSXuanJ.Research on SCR precise ammonia injection control based on bp neural network. In: 2021 4th world conference on mechanical engineering and intelligent manufacturing (WCMEIM), Shanghai, China, 12–14 November 2021, pp.19–22. New York, NY: IEEE.
146.
PlaBBaresPSanchisEJ, et al. Ammonia injection failure diagnostic and correction in engine after-treatment system by NOx and NH3 emissions observation. Fuel2022; 322: 123936.
147.
LiuBYanFHuJ, et al. Modeling and multi-objective optimization of nox conversion efficiency and NH3 slip for a diesel engine. Sustainability2016; 8(5): 478.
148.
ZhaoWZhangL.Dynamic data modeling of SCR denitration system based on mutual information. In: Proceedings of the 2018 international conference on computer science, electronics and communication engineering, 2018, pp.321–324. Amsterdam: Atlantis Press.
149.
TayamonSZambranoDWigrenT, et al. Nonlinear black box identification of a selective catalytic reduction system. IFAC Proc Volumes2011; 44(1): 11845–11850.
150.
GundlapallySRPapadimitriouIWahiduzzamanS, et al. Development of ECU capable grey-box models from detailed Models—application to a SCR reactor. Emission Control Sci Technol2016; 2(3): 124–136.
151.
ZanardoGStadlbauerSWaschlH, et al. Grey box control oriented SCR model. SAE technical paper, 2013.
152.
ChenPWangJ.Control-oriented model for integrated diesel engine and aftertreatment systems thermal management. Control Eng Pract2014; 22: 81–93.
153.
ZhaoJWangJ.Integrated model predictive control of hybrid electric vehicles coupled with aftertreatment systems. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2016; 65(3): 1199–1211.
154.
MaYWangJ.Integrated power management and aftertreatment system control for hybrid electric vehicles with road grade preview. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2017; 66(12): 10935–10945.
155.
MaYWangJ.Predictive control for NOx emission reductions in diesel engine vehicle platoon application. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2019; 68: 6429–6440.
