Hybrid electric vehicles have proven to be an effective solution for the auto industry to satisfy the increasingly stringent CO2 regulations for the short-medium term. Proper sizing of the different components is required to benefit from the hybrid architecture full potential. This paper proposes a unified method that can be applied in both cases. The method uses the energy flow, storage, and consumption during a cycle to perform the sizing. A 350 V P2 plug-in hybrid and a 48 V P2 mild hybrid are taken as a case study. The sizing is performed by adopting the WLTP cycle and subsequently analyzing the energy profile.
LiaoYGQuailAM. Component sizing of traction motor in hybrid powertrains. In: 2011 IEEE vehicle power and propulsion conference, Chicago, IL, 6–9 September 2011, pp.1–6. New York, NY: IEEE.
10.
SundströmOGuzzellaLSolticP.Optimal hybridization in two parallel hybrid electric vehicles using dynamic programming. IFAC Proc Volumes2008; 41: 4642–4647.
11.
SundstromOGuzzellaLSolticP.Torque-assist hybrid electric powertrain sizing: from optimal control towards a sizing law. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2010; 18: 837–849.
12.
LukicSMEmadiA.Effects of drivetrain hybridization on fuel economy and dynamic performance of parallel hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2004; 53: 385–389.
13.
GaldiVIppolitoLPiccoloA, et al. A genetic-based methodology for hybrid electric vehicles sizing. Soft Comput2001; 5: 451–457.
14.
CastellazziLRuzimovSBonfittoA, et al. A method for battery sizing in parallel P4 mild hybrid electric vehicles. SAE Int J Elec Veh2022; 11: 97–111.
15.
MadanipourVMontazeri-GhMMahmoodi-kM.Multi-objective component sizing of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle for optimal energy management. Clean Technol Environ Policy2016; 18: 1189–1202.
16.
HouCWangHOuyangM.Battery sizing for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles in Beijing: a TCO model based analysis. Energies2014; 7: 5374–5399.
17.
WuXCaoBLiX, et al. Component sizing optimization of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Appl Energy2011; 88: 799–804.
18.
HuXMouraSJMurgovskiN, et al. Integrated optimization of battery sizing, charging, and power management in plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2016; 24: 1036–1043.
19.
UN ECE/TRANS/180/Add.15/Amend.6. Technical regulation on Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Procedures (WLTP).
20.
EderASchützeNRijndersA, et al. Development of a European Utility Factor Curve for OVC-HEVs for WLTP. Report, Appendix 1 – Utility Factors in: Riemersma I. Technical Report on the development of a Worldwide Harmonised Light duty vehicle Test Procedure (WLTP). https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2015/wp29grpe/GRPE-72-02-Rev.1.pdf (2016, accessed 20 January 2022).
21.
PlötzPFunkeSÁJochemP.Empirical fuel consumption and CO2Emissions of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. J Ind Ecol2018; 22: 773–784.
22.
PlötzPJöhrensJ.Realistic test cycle utility factors for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles in Europe. Report, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI, Karlsruhe, April2021.
MohanGAssadianFLongoS. Comparative analysis of forward-facing models vs backwardfacing models in powertrain component sizing. In: IET hybrid and electric vehicles conference, London, 6–7 November 2013, pp.1–6. IET.
25.
Puma-BenavidesDSIzquierdo-ReyesJGalluzziR, et al. Influence of the final ratio on the consumption of an electric vehicle under conditions of standardized driving cycles. Appl Sci2021; 11: 11474.
26.
OnoriSSerraoLRizzoniG.Hybrid electric vehicles: energy management strategies. 1st ed. London, UK: Springer, 2016.
27.
BöhmeTJFrankB.Hybrid systems, optimal control and hybrid vehicles. 1st ed. Cham: Springer International, 2017.
28.
HegdeSBonfittoARahmehH, et al. Optimal selection of equivalence factors for ECMS in mild hybrid electric vehicles. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2021 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. Volume 1: 23rd international conference on advanced vehicle technologies (AVT). Virtual, Online, 17 August–19 August 2021, paper no. DETC2021-71621, V001T01A019. ASME.
29.
BiswasAEmadiA.Energy management systems for electrified powertrains: state-of-the-art review and future trends. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2019; 68: 6453–6467.
30.
RahmehHBonfittoARuzimovS, et al. Fuzzy logic vs equivalent consumption minimization strategy for energy management in P2 hybrid electric vehicles. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2020 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. Volume 4: 22nd international conference on advanced vehicle technologies (AVT). Virtual, Online, 17–19 August 2021, paper no. DETC2020-22431, V004T04A026. ASME.
31.
MaranoVOnoriSGuezennecY, et al. Lithium-ion batteries life estimation for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. In: IEEE vehicle power and propulsion conference, Dearborn, MI, 7–10 September 2009 pp.536–543. New York: IEEE.
32.
BonfittoAFeracoSTonoliA, et al. Estimation accuracy and computational cost analysis of artificial neural networks for state of charge estimation in lithium batteries. Batteries2019; 5(2): 47.
