Research on predictive coordinated control of ride comfort and road friendliness for heavy vehicle ISD suspension based on the hybrid-hook damping strategy
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2024
Research on predictive coordinated control of ride comfort and road friendliness for heavy vehicle ISD suspension based on the hybrid-hook damping strategy
With the appearance of inerter, the ISD suspension composed of “Inerter-Spring-Damper” opens up a new direction for efficient coordination of ride comfort and road friendliness for heavy vehicles. In this paper, a reference model based on the hybrid-hook damping strategy is proposed, and the mechatronic inerter is used as an active suspension force generator in the actual controlled model. Then, the coordinated control of the vehicle ISD suspension model is realized by the model predictive control (MPC) approach. The test results show that, the RMS values of the body acceleration and dynamic tire load of the controllable ISD suspension is smaller than the traditional passive and passive ISD suspension under the sinusoidal road inputs. Under the random road input, compared with the traditional passive suspension, the controllable ISD suspension has improved the RMS value of the body acceleration by 26.61%, and the road damage coefficient has been improved by 20.13%. Experiments show that the controllable ISD suspension of heavy vehicles based on the hybrid-hook damping strategy has comprehensive improvement of vehicle ride comfort and road friendliness.
ChenKHeSXuE, et al. Research on ride comfort analysis and hierarchical optimization of heavy vehicles with coupled nonlinear dynamics of suspension. Measurement2020; 165: 108142.
2.
ThillikkaniSNatarajM.Fatigue life prediction of heavy vehicle suspension system under varying load conditions. Adv Mech Eng2020; 12(11): 1–10.
3.
LeVNguyenVJiaoR, et al. Low-frequency vibration analysis of heavy vehicle suspension system under various operating conditions. J Math Models Eng2020; 6(1): 13–22.
4.
HuangKXianYJLiCM, et al. Application of Udwadia–Kalaba approach to semi-active suspension control of a heavy-duty truck. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2020; 234(1): 245–257.
5.
SureshkumarGKumaraswamidhasLA. Optimization of structural parameters through objective-evaluation of ride comfort in a heavy-duty commercial vehicle. Cogent Eng2020; 7(1): 1743408.
6.
LuYJLiSH.Research on dynamic optimization for road-friendly vehicle suspension. Sensors Transducers2014; 181(10): 189–199.
7.
YaoJJ.Parameters optimization and semi-active control of suspension based on the road friendliness. J Chem Pharm Res2014; 6(6): 1663–1670.
8.
GongMYanX.Robust control strategy of heavy vehicle active suspension based on road level estimation. Int J Autom Technol2021; 22(1): 141–153.
9.
KwonKSeoMKimH, et al. Multi-objective optimisation of hydro-pneumatic suspension with gas–oil emulsion for heavy-duty vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn2020; 58(7): 1146–1165.
10.
ZhangJDingFZhangB, et al. An effective projection-based nonlinear adaptive control strategy for heavy vehicle suspension with hysteretic leaf spring. Nonlinear Dyn2020; 100(1): 451–473.
11.
JieLWencuiGWenzhuW.Random Analysis of Heavy-Duty vehicle based on rigid–Elastic Synthesis. IEEJ Trans Electr Electron Eng2020; 15(9): 1350–1364.
12.
WangWLiJLiuG, et al. Simulation study on ride comfort of three-axle heavy vehicle spatial model based on rigid-elastic model and pseudo-excitation method. J Adv Mech Des Syst Manuf2020; 14(1): JAMDSM0016–JAMDSM0016.
13.
SmithMC.Synthesis of mechanical networks: the inerter. IEEE Trans Automat Contr2002; 47(10): 1648–1662.
14.
LiangQLiLYangQ.Seismic analysis of the tuned-inerter-damper enhanced mega-sub structure system. Struct Control Health Monit2021; 28(2): e2658.
15.
Thiers-MoggiaRMálaga-ChuquitaypeC.Seismic control of flexible rocking structures using inerters. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn2020; 49(14): 1519–1538.
16.
VillosladaDSantosMTomas-RodriguezM.Inerter-based passive structural control for barge floating offshore wind turbines. IFAC-Papers2020; 53(2): 12358–12363.
17.
LuoJMacdonaldJHGJiangJZ.Identification of optimum cable vibration absorbers using fixed-sized-inerter layouts. Mech Mach Theory2019; 140: 292–304.
18.
HuangZWHuaXGChenZQ, et al. Performance evaluation of inerter-based damping devices for structural vibration control of stay cables. Smart Struct Syst2019; 23(6): 615–626.
19.
YangXYanLShenY, et al. Optimal design and dynamic control of an ISD vehicle suspension based on an ADD positive real network. IEEE Access2020; 8: 94294–94306.
20.
ShenYJiangJZNeildSA, et al. Vehicle vibration suppression using an inerter-based mechatronic device. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2020; 234(10–11): 2592–2601.
21.
ShenYHuaJFanW, et al. Optimal design and dynamic performance analysis of a fractional-order electrical network-based vehicle mechatronic ISD suspension. Mechanical System and Signal Processing2023; 184: 109718.
22.
YangXZhaoWLiuY, et al. Design and experimental study of the energy-regenerative circuit of a hybrid vehicle suspension. Sci Prog2020; 103(1): 36850419874999–36850419875019.
23.
YangLWangRDingR, et al. Investigation on the dynamic performance of a new semi-active hydro-pneumatic inerter-based suspension system with MPC control strategy. Mech Syst Signal Process2021; 154: 107569.
24.
YangXYanLShenY, et al. Dynamic performance analysis and parameters perturbation study of inerter–spring–damper suspension for heavy vehicle. J Low Freq Noise Vib Active Control2021; 40: 1335–1350.
25.
LiuXJiangJZHarrisonA, et al. Truck suspension incorporating inerters to minimise road damage. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2020; 234(10–11): 2693–2705.
26.
WangFCChanHA.Vehicle suspensions with a mechatronic network strut. Veh Syst Dyn2011; 49(5): 811–830.
27.
YuanHLiYJiangJZ, et al. A design methodology for passive mechatronic vibration absorbers. Mech Mach Theory2022; 167: 104523.
28.
ChenMZQHuYLiC, et al. Semi-active suspension with semi-active inerter and semi-active damper. IFAC Proc Volumes2014; 47(3): 11225–11230.
29.
ChenMZQHuYLiC, et al. Application of semi-active inerter in semi-active suspensions via force tracking. J Vibr Acoustics Trans ASME2016; 138(4): 041014.
30.
ChengMJiaoX.Modified active disturbance rejection control for non-linear semi-active vehicle suspension with magneto-rheological damper. Trans Inst Meas Contr2018; 40(8): 2611–2621.
31.
FernandoDGAhmadianM.A hybrid control policy for semi-active vehicle suspensions. Shock Vibration2018; 10(1): 59–69.
32.
YangXSongHShenY, et al. Control of the vehicle inertial suspension based on the mixed Skyhook and power-driven-damper strategy. IEEE Access2020; 8: 217473–217482.
33.
LiuCChenLYangX, et al. General theory of skyhook control and its application to semi-active suspension control strategy design. IEEE Access2019; 7: 101552–101560.
34.
KrauzePKasprzykJKozyraA, et al. Experimental analysis of vibration control algorithms appliedfor an off-road vehicle with magnetorheological dampers. J Low Freq Noise Vibr Active Control2018; 37(3): 619–639.
35.
ColeDJCebonD.Truck suspension design to minimize road damage. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering1996; 210: 95–107.
