In this paper, stabilization of tele-driving system in presence of communication time delay is studied using a 103 DOF vehicle model generated in ADAMS/Car Software. The purpose of this study is achieving a real sense of driving for tele-driving system in virtual environment under complicated driving and road conditions. To this aim, the performance of the various control architectures, in terms of position and force tracking, are investigated. Hence, the two-channel architecture is chosen as the most appropriate scheme to implement the haptic control system for the vehicle steering mechanism. In this paper, we designed an effective haptic feedback control for vehicle steering mechanism in the tele-driving system so that a command can be exerted to steering wheel by the human operator, which passes through the communication channels and will be applied to unmanned vehicle steering system. It is verified that an appropriate coordination performance under the human input can be obtained with the proposed control framework. To overcome the possible instability problem associated with existence of time-delay in communication channels, wave variables and their corrections are effectively embedded into the control system. Finally, the proposed bilateral tele-driving control on a rough 3D road surface at complicated driving and road conditions in the presence of time-delay are examined comprehensively.
SutarMKPathakPM.Hybrid trajectory/force control strategy for the in vivo robot during stomach biopsy. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng2019; 41: 1–8.
2.
GuoJLiuCPoignetP.A scaled bilateral teleoperation system for robotic-assisted surgery with time delay. J Intell Robot Syst2019; 95: 165–192.
3.
MarturiNRastegarpanahATakahashiC, et al. Towards advanced robotic manipulation for nuclear decommissioning: a pilot study on tele-operation and autonomy. In: 2016 International conference on robotics and automation for humanitarian applications (RAHA), 2016, pp.1–8. New York: IEEE.
4.
QiXCaiZJ.Cooperative pursuit control for multiple underactuated underwater vehicles with time delay in three-dimensional space. Robotica2021; 39(6): 1101–1115.
5.
AspragathosNMoulianitisVKoustoumpardisP.Special issue on human–robot interaction (HRI). Robotica2020; 38(10): 1715–1716.
6.
AlmusawiARJDulgerLCKapucuS. Online teaching of robotic arm by human–robot interaction: end effector force/torque sensing. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng2018; 40(9): 1–14.
7.
HannafordB.A design framework for teleoperators with kinesthetic feedback. IEEE Trans Robot Autom1989; 5(4): 426–434.
8.
Hashtrudi-ZaadKSalcudeanSE. On the use of local force feedback for transparent teleoperation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), vol. 3, 1999, pp.1863–1869. New York: IEEE.
9.
YokokohjiYYoshikawaT.Bilateral control of master-slave manipulators for ideal kinesthetic coupling-formulation and experiment. IEEE Trans Robot Autom1994; 10(5): 605–620.
10.
LawrenceDA.Stability and transparency in bilateral teleoperation. IEEE Trans Robot Autom1993; 9(5): 624–637.
11.
YangCWangXLiZ, et al. Teleoperation control based on combination of wave variable and neural networks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst2017; 47(8): 2125–2136.
12.
BaiGMengYLiuL, et al. Path tracking control of unmanned ground vehicles considering the signal time delay. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering. Epub ahead of print 2023. DOI: 10.09544070231163348.
13.
NamnabatMZaeriAHVahediM.A passivity-based control strategy for nonlinear bilateral teleoperation employing estimated external forces. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng2020; 42(12): 1–10.
14.
ArefanjaziHAtaeiMEkramianM, et al. A robust distributed observer design for Lipchitz nonlinear systems with time-varying switching topology. J Franklin Inst2023; 360(14): 10728–10744.
15.
MousaviAArefanjaziHSadeghiM, et al. Comparison of feature extraction with PCA and LTP methods and investigating the effect of dimensionality reduction in the bat algorithm for face recognition. Int J Robot Control Syst2023; 3(3): 501–509.
16.
BelloFKajimotoHVisellY (ed). Haptics: perception, devices, control, and applications. In: 10th International Conference, EuroHaptics 2016, Proceedings, Part II, London, UK, July 4–7, 2016.
17.
FerrellWR.Delayed force feedback. Hum Factors Ergon Soc1966; 8(5): 449–455.
18.
AndersonRJSpongMW.Asymptotic stability for force reflecting teleoperators with time delay. Int J Robot Res1992; 11(2): 135–149.
19.
NiemeyerGSlotineJJE. Telemanipulation with time delays. Int J Robot Res2004; 23(9): 873–890.
HannafordBRyuJH.Time-domain passivity control of haptic interfaces. IEEE Trans Robot Autom2002; 18(1): 1–10.
22.
AraiHNagakuraHUchimuraY. Variable-horizon based model predictive control for tele-operation with time-varying delay. In: IEEE international symposium on industrial electronics, June 2020, pp.586–591. New York: IEEE.
23.
TianDYashiroDOhnishiK. Frequency-domain analysis of wave variable based teleoperation and its equivalent implementation. In: Proceedings of 2011 1st international symposium on access spaces (ISAS 2011), 2011, pp.41–46.
24.
KawashimaKTadanoKWangC, et al. Bilateral teleoperation with time delay using modified wave variable based controller. In: Proceedings – IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 2009, pp.4326–4331. New York: IEEE.
25.
YasrebiNConstantinescuD. Passive wave variable control of haptic interaction with an unknown virtual environment. In: Proceedings – IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 2011, pp.919–924. New York: IEEE.
26.
HuangJCWuCIChangYH, et al. Design and implementation of wave variable based teleoperation systems. In: 2010 International conference on system science and engineering (ICSSE 2010), 2010, pp.304–309. New York: IEEE.
27.
ZhuYAoyamaTHasegawaY.Enhancing the transparency by onomatopoeia for passivity-based time-delayed teleoperation. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2020; 5(2): 2981–2986.
28.
SlotineJJELiW. On the adaptive control of robot manipulators. Int J Robot Res1987; 6(3): 49–59.
29.
WillemsJC.Dissipative dynamical systems part I: general theory. Arch Ration Mech Anal1972; 45(5): 321–351.
30.
AziminejadATavakoliMPatelRV, et al. Wave-based time delay compensation in bilateral teleoperation: two-channel versus four-channel architectures. In: Proceedings of the American control conference, 2007, pp.1449–1454. New York: IEEE.
31.
SlawiñskiEMoyaVSantiagoD, et al. Force and position-velocity coordination for delayed bilateral teleoperation of a mobile robot. Robotica2019; 37(10): 1768–1784.
32.
SoltaniAAzadiSJazarRN.Integrated control of braking and steering systems to improve vehicle stability based on optimal wheel slip ratio estimation. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng2022; 44(3): 1–15.
33.
LiuWZhangQWanY, et al. Yaw stability control of automated guided vehicle under the condition of centroid variation. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng2021; 44(1): 1–15.
34.
García-ValdovinosLGParra-VegaVArteagaMA.Observer-based sliding mode impedance control of bilateral teleoperation under constant unknown time delay. Robot Auton Syst2007; 55(8): 609–617.
35.
LamTMMulderMVan PaassenMM.Haptic interface in UAV teleoperation using force-stiffness feedback. In: Conference proceedings – IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, 2009, pp.835–840. New York: IEEE.
36.
ParkSSeoCKimJP, et al. Robustly stable rate-mode bilateral teleoperation using an energy-bounding approach. Mechatronics2011; 21(1): 176–184.
37.
MaLXuZSchillingK. Robust bilateral teleoperation of a car-like rover with communication delay. In: 2009 European control conference (ECC 2009), March2014, pp.2337–2342. New York: IEEE.
38.
KuniiYKubotaT. Human machine cooperative tele-drive by path compensation for long range traversability. In: IEEE international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 2006, pp.4278–4283. New York: IEEE.
39.
PanYJCanudas-de WitCSenameO.A new predictive approach for bilateral teleoperation with applications to drive-by-wire systems. IEEE Trans Robot2006; 22(6): 1146–1162.
40.
LiWDingLGaoH, et al. Haptic tele-driving of wheeled mobile robots under nonideal wheel rolling, kinematic control and communication time delay. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst2020; 50(1): 336–347.
41.
DongYChopraN.Passivity-based bilateral tele-driving system with parametric uncertainty and communication delays. IEEE Control Syst Lett2019; 3(2): 350–355.
42.
ZouSCZhaoWZ.Synchronization and stability control of dual-motor intelligent steer-by-wire vehicle. Mech Syst Signal Process2020; 145: 106925.
43.
LeeJKimKIKimM, et al. Haptic control of steer-by-wire systems using parameter estimation of rack system lateral load model. Proc of IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2022; 236(4): 540–552.
44.
CheonDSNamKH.Steering torque control using variable impedance models for a steer-by-wire system. Int J Automot Technol2017; 18(2): 263–270.
45.
WangYWangYTieM.Hybrid adaptive learning neural network control for steer-by-wire systems via sigmoid tracking differentiator and disturbance observer. Eng Appl Artif Intell2021; 104: 104393.
46.
WangYLiuYWangY, et al. Neural output feedback control of automobile steer-by-wire system with predefined performance and composite learning. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2023; 72(5): 5906–5921.
47.
KushairiSSchmidtROmarAR, et al. Tractor-trailer modelling and validation. Int J Heavy Veh Syst2014; 21(1): 64–82.
48.
MitraACFernandesENawputeK, et al. Development and validation of a simulation model of automotive suspension system using MSC-ADAMS. Mater Today Proc2018; 5(2): 4327–4334.
KanchwalaHChatterjeeA.ADAMS model validation for an all-terrain vehicle using test track data. J Simul2019; 11(7): 619–627.
51.
LiuBJChenCSiYF.Application research on vehicle steering stability based on ADAMS/Car. Appl Mech Mater2015; 730: 289–292.
52.
PradoMCunhaRHNetoÁC, et al. Bus handling analysis and experimental validation using the multibody system technique. SAE Technical Papers, March2001.
53.
PolachPVáclavíkJ.Modified approach to the simulations of bus driving tests. Appl Mech Mater2016; 821: 266–273.
54.
KhaknejadMBKazemiRAzadiS, et al. Identification of vehicle parameters using modified least square method in ADAMS/Car. In: International conference on modeling, identification and control, 2011, pp.98–103.
55.
RaaijDWJ. Application of bilateral control in steer-by-wire. Master’s Thesis. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, 2008.
56.
DelwicheT.Contribution to the design of control laws for bilateral teleoperation with a view to applications in minimally invasive surgery. PhD Dissertation, University of York, York, 2009.
57.
AliagaIRubioASanchezE.Experimental quantitative comparison of different control architectures for master-slave teleoperation. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2004; 12(1): 2–11.
58.
AdamsRJHannafordB.Stable haptic interaction with virtual environments. IEEE Trans Robot Autom1999; 15(3): 465–474.
59.
AbbottJJOkamuraAM. Analysis of virtual fixture contact stability for telemanipulation. In: Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No. 03CH37453), vol. 3. 2003, pp.2699–2706. New York: IEEE.
60.
AndersonRJSpongMW.Bilateral control of teleoperators with time delay. IEEE Trans Autom Control1989; 34(5): 494–501.
61.
ColgateJEHoganN.Robust control of dynamically interacting systems. Int J Control1988; 48(1): 65–88.
62.
JeongSHJungS. Bilateral teleoperation control of a quadrotor system with a haptic device: experimental studies. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), 2014, pp.543–548. New York: IEEE.
63.
ZhuJHeXGueaiebW. Trends in the control schemes for bilateral teleoperation with time delay. In: Lecture notes in computer science (Including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics), vol. 6752, 2011, pp.146–155. Berlin: Springer.
64.
SmithACHashtrudi-ZaadK.Smith predictor type control architectures for time delayed teleoperation. Int J Robot Res2016; 25(8): 797–818.
65.
Martinez-PalafoxOLeeDSpongMW, et al. Bilateral teleoperation of mobile robot over delayed communication network: implementation. In: IEEE international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 2006, pp.4193–4198. New York: IEEE.
66.
ChopraNSpongMWHircheS, et al. Bilateral teleoperation over the internet: the time varying delay problem. Proc Am Control Conf2003; 1: 155–160.
67.
RichardJP.Time-delay systems: an overview of some recent advances and open problems. Automatica2003; 39(10): 1667–1694.
68.
MeradMDowneyRJObuzS, et al. Isometric torque control for neuromuscular electrical stimulation with time-varying input delay. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2016; 24(3): 971–978.
69.
KamalapurkarRFischerNObuzS, et al. Time-varying input and state delay compensation for uncertain nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control2016; 61(3): 834–839.
