Investigation on the mechanical uncertainty of resistance spot weldings and its effect on structure crashworthiness of automotive B-pillars under side impacts
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2025
Investigation on the mechanical uncertainty of resistance spot weldings and its effect on structure crashworthiness of automotive B-pillars under side impacts
Resistance spot welding (RSW) is the main connection method for the white body structure of automobiles. Understanding the mechanical uncertainty of RSWs and its effect on structure crashworthiness design is of great significance for vehicle safety and lightweight design. In this work, the mechanical uncertainty of RSW was experimentally investigated and its effect on automotive B-pillar crashworthiness under side impacts was numerically analyzed based on a hybrid response surface model (HRSM). Firstly, the mechanical uncertainty of RSWs and associated failure mechanism were investigated and the fluctuation range of RSW strength under different loading conditions were quantified according to experimental results. Then, a reasonable RSW modeling method and subsystem collision simulation approach were demonstrated and the univariate sensitivity analysis was carried out to reveal the effect of RSWs’ mechanical property on B-pillar crashworthiness. Finally, a HRSM integrating Kriging polynomial and deep neural network (DNN) were proposed as surrogate model, based on which the multi-factor analysis was conducted to explore effects of RSW strength uncertainty on structure crashworthiness design.
GhadianlouAAbdullahSB.Crashworthiness design of vehicle side door beams under low-speed pole side impacts. Thin-Walled Struct2013; 67: 25–33.
2.
BaroutajiASajjiaMOlabiA-G.On the crashworthiness performance of thinwalled energy absorbers: recent advances and future developments. Thin-Walled Struct2017; 118: 137–163.
3.
FangJSunGQiuN, et al. On design optimization for structural crashworthiness and its state of the art. Struct Multidiscipl Optim2017; 55: 1091–1119.
4.
HsuJKondoHAwanoM, et al. Robust design of front impact crash simulation with FEM by taking account of manufacturing quality on spot weld. SAE technical paper 2006-01-0761, 2006.
AcarESolankiK.System reliability based vehicle design for crashworthiness and effects of various uncertainty reduction measures. Struct Multidiscipl Optim2009; 39: 311–325.
7.
MajeskeKDHammettPC.Identifying source of variation in sheet metal stamping. Int J Flexible Manuf Syst2003; 15(n1): 5–18.
8.
LeeSHHanCSOhSI.Comparative crash simulations incorporating the results of sheet forming analysis. Eng Comput2001; 18(56): 744–758.
9.
BlumSWillJ.Combining robustness evaluation with current automotive MDO application. Weimarer Optimierungs-und Stochastiktage, 3.0-Novermber 23–24, 2006.
10.
ChenNNWangHPCarlsonBE, et al. Fracture mechanisms of Al/steel resistance spot welds in coach peel and cross tension testing. J Mater Process Technol2018; 252: 348–361.
11.
DaneshpourSRiekehrSKoakM, et al. Failure behaviour of laser spot welds of trip800 steel sheets under coach-peel loading. Sci Technol Weld Join2013; 12(6): 508–515.
12.
XuFXSunGYLiGY, et al. Experimental study on crashworthiness of tailor welded blank (TWB) thin-walled high-strength steel (HSS) tubular structures. Thin-Walled Struct2014; 74: 12–27.
13.
ZhuPShiYZhangK, et al. Optimum design of an automotive inner door panel with a tailor-welded blank structure. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2008; 222(8): 1337–1348.
14.
ShiYLinZZhuP, et al. Impact modeling of the weld line of tailor-welded blank. Mater Des2008; 29(1): 232–238.
15.
GiampieriALing-ChinJMaZ, et al. A review of the current automotive manufacturing practice from an energy perspective. Appl Energy2020; 261: 114074.
16.
WillJFrankT. Robustness analysis of structural crash load cases at Daimler AG. Weimar, Optimization and Stochastic Days, 5.0-20/21 November 2008.
17.
WillJBucherCGanserM, et al. Computation and visualization of statistical measures on FE structures for forming simulations. Weimarer Optimierungs-und Stochastiktage, 2.0-1/2 December 2005.
18.
HuhHKimKPKimSH.Crashworthiness assessment of front side members in an auto-body considering the fabrication histories. Int J Mech Sci2003; 45: 1645–1660.
19.
WanXWangYFangC.Welding defects occurrence and their effects on weld quality in resistance spot welding of AHSS steel. I SIJ Int2014; 54(8): 1883–1889.
20.
GaoWMWangHYXuDG.Effect of spot weld in simulations of vehicle crash. J Tongji Univ (Nat Sci)2001; 29(7): 870–872.
21.
PawerSSinghAKKaushikL, et al. Characterizing local distribution of microstructural features and its correlation with microhardness in resistance spot welded ultra-low-carbon steel: experimental and finite element characterization. Mater Charact2022; 194: 112382.
22.
LiYBLinZQShenQ.Numerical analysis of transport phenomena in resistance spot welding process. J Manuf Sci Eng2011; 133(3): 031019.
23.
ZhaoXZhangYSChenGL.Ultrasonic fast identification of automotive body spot weld defect based on echo characteristics qualitative analysis. Sci Technol Weld Joining2013; 11(6): 731–736.
24.
LinPCLinSHPanJ.Modeling of failure near spot welds in lap-shear specimens based on a plane stress rigid inclusion analysis. Eng Fract Mech2006; 73(15): 2229–2249.
25.
PouranvariMMarashiSPHSafanamaDS.Failure mode transition in AHSS resistance spot welds. Part II: experimental investigation and model validation. Mater Sci Eng A2011; 528: 8344–8352.
26.
PouranvariMMarashiSPH.Failure mode transition in AHSS resistance spot welds. Part I. Controlling factors. Mater Sci Eng A2011; 528: 8337–8343.
27.
MaryaMWangKHectorLG, et al. Tensile-shear forces and fracture modes in single and multiple weld specimens in dual-phase steels. J Manuf Sci Eng2005; 128(1): 287–298.
28.
XuZWXiaoAXJiangSJ, et al. Effect of plate thickness on mechanical properties and failure behaviors of resistance spot welded advanced high strength steels. J Manuf Process2023; 95: 392–404.
29.
XuZWTianCMaoLZ.A mechanical properties and failure mechanism study for resistance spot welded AHSSs under coach-peel and lap-shear loads. Eng Fract Mech2023; 290: 109474.
30.
YangJKYeETPengQ.Application of spot weld model using solid element in simulation of front longitudinal beam crash. J Jilin Univ (Eng Technol Ed)2011; 41(6): 542–548.
31.
LinCH.Modeling and simulation of van for side impact sensing tests. In: The 20th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles proceedings, Lyon, France, 2007.
32.
RusinekAZaeraRForquinP, et al. Effect of plastic deformation and boundary conditions combined with elastic wave propagation on the collapse site of a crash box. Thin-Walled Struct2008; 46: 1143–1163.
33.
GuoWHShenJPZhuXC.Component test design and optimization of B-pillar based on vehicle simulation. Automob Technol2013; 12(6): 40–45.
34.
DongRQXiaoF.Verification method at component level based on B-pillar crashworthiness evaluation. J Automot Saf Energy2016; 7(3): 299–304.
35.
HuangH.A safety study based on virtual test of the vehicle B-pillar side crash. Wuhan University of Technology, 2012.
36.
DongXQ.A research on the dummy injury in vehicle side impact base on components tests. Automot Eng2012; 34(10): 894–942.
37.
ZhangYZhuPChenGL.Lightweight design of automotive front side rail based on robust optimization. Thin-Walled Struct2007; 45: 670–676.
38.
ShiDWatanabeKNaitoJ, et al. Design optimization and application of hot-stamped B pillar with local patchwork blanks. Thin-Walled Struct2022; 170: 108523.
