Homogeneous domination-based active shimmy control method for electric vehicle with hub motors considering unknown sensor measurement error and nonlinearity
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2026
Homogeneous domination-based active shimmy control method for electric vehicle with hub motors considering unknown sensor measurement error and nonlinearity
Vehicles may generate wheel shimmy during motion, affecting driving stability and comfort. The use of hub motors increases the unsprung mass of vehicles, exacerbating this issue. How to actively eliminate wheel shimmy is crucial for the automotive industry. To accurately describe the shimmy phenomenon and eliminate it, a new seven-degree-of-freedom (7DOF) dynamic model that includes the steering system, suspension, and electric wheels is developed. By Lagrange’s theorem, the shimmy dynamics equations are derived, resulting in shimmy control state equations. Compared with other shimmy control state equations, these equations consider unknown sensor measurement errors and nonlinear terms. A homogeneous domination-based observer is constructed, which includes the unknown sensor measurement errors. Then, a homogeneous domination-based output feedback controller is designed for vehicle shimmy control. This controller has strong robustness and fast convergence. Via the Lyapunov method, we prove that the designed controller can stabilize the shimmy system asymptotically. Finally, numerical simulations and co-simulations were conducted. By comparing the response time, convergence speed, and overshoot with the SMC, the homogeneous domination-based controller demonstrates superior control performance under specific conditions.
WeiHXuYWangX, et al. Nonlinear shimmy and dynamic bifurcation in vehicle system with driver steering input. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering. Epub ahead of print 16January2023. DOI: 10.1177/09544070231213779.
2.
ZhangNYinGNanC, et al. A state-of-the-art survey on shimmy problem in vehicle dynamics. J Mech Eng2017; 53: 16–28.
3.
WuPLuoRYuZ, et al. Research on the unsprung mass effect of in-wheel motor drives based on a half-vehicle model. J Tsinghua Univ (Sci Technol)2024; 64(8): 1445–1455.
4.
HanYLiGWangQ, et al. Ride comfort of a new in-wheel motor driving electric vehicle based on the negative effect of vertical vibration. Sci Technol Eng2019; 19(16): 363–369.
5.
DaogaoWTongJChangheC, et al. Hopf bifurcation character of an interactive vehicle–road shimmy system under bisectional road conditions. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2017; 231(3): 405–417.
6.
MiTStepanGTakacsD, et al. Shimmy model for electric vehicle with independent suspensions. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2018; 232(3): 330–340.
7.
YuXLiuXWangX, et al. Vibration control of improved LQG for wheel drive electric vehicle based on uncertain parameters. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2021; 235(8): 2253–2264.
8.
TakácsDOroszGStépánG.Delay effects in shimmy dynamics of wheels with stretched string-like tyres. Eur J Mech A Solids2009; 28(3): 516–525.
BeregiSTakacsDGyebroszkiG, et al. Theoretical and experimental study on the nonlinear dynamics of wheel-shimmy. Nonlinear Dyn2019; 98(4): 2581–2593.
11.
BeregiSTakacsDStepanG.Bifurcation analysis of wheel shimmy with non-smooth effects and time delay in the tyre–ground contact. Nonlinear Dyn2019; 98(1): 841–858.
12.
MiTStepanGTakacsD, et al. Vehicle shimmy modeling with Pacejka’s magic formula and the delayed tire model. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn2020; 15(3): 031005.
13.
WeiDZhuYShiW, et al. A new design to match the vehicle toe-in and camber considering the cornering property of the tire. J Adv Mech Des Syst Manuf2020; 14(1): JAMDSM0004.
14.
JiangJYangWWeiH, et al. Distribution analysis of multiple limit cycles of vehicle shimmy system with consideration of joint clearances. Mech Solids2022; 57(6): 1467–1474.
15.
DuttaSChoiSB.Control of a shimmy vibration in vehicle steering system using a magneto-rheological damper. J Vib Control2018; 24(4): 797–807.
16.
MengQQianCShuY.Active steering wheel shimmy control for electric vehicle by sampled-data output feedback. ISA Trans2019; 84: 262–270.
17.
MengQQianCHuC, et al. Finite-time active shimmy control based on uncertain disturbance observer for electric vehicle with independent suspension. IET Intell Transp Syst2020; 14(13): 1835–1844.
18.
QianCLiJ.Global output feedback stabilization of upper-triangular nonlinear systems using a homogeneous domination approach. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control2006; 16(9): 441–463.
19.
XieXLiuL.A homogeneous domination approach to state feedback of stochastic high-order nonlinear systems with time-varying delay. IEEE Trans Autom Control2012; 58(2): 494–499.
20.
ChenCCXuSSD. Global stabilization for a class of genuinely nonlinear systems with a time-varying power: an interval homogeneous domination approach. IEEE Access2018; 6: 11255–11264.
21.
SunZYLiJJWenC, et al. Adaptive event-triggered prescribed-time stabilization of uncertain nonlinear systems with asymmetric time-varying output constraint. IEEE Trans Autom Control2024; 69(8): 5454–5461.
22.
SunZYLiJJWenC, et al. A new adaptive designated-time stabilizing strategy for uncertain time-varying nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control2025; 70(1): 579–586.
23.
QianC. A homogeneous domination approach for global output feedback stabilization of a class of nonlinear systems. In: Proceedings of the 2005, American control conference, 2005, Portland, OR, USA, 8–10 June 2005, pp.4708–4715. New York: IEEE.
24.
LiJQianCDingS.Global finite-time stabilisation by output feedback for a class of uncertain nonlinear systems. Int J Control2010; 83(11): 2241–2252.
25.
ZhaiJ.Decentralised output-feedback control for a class of stochastic non-linear systems using homogeneous domination approach. IET Control Theory Appl2013; 7(8): 1098–1109.
26.
ChaiLQianC.Global stabilization via homogeneous output feedback for a class of uncertain nonlinear systems subject to time delays. Trans Inst Meas Control2014; 36(4): 478–486.
27.
CaoKQianC.Finite-time controllers for a class of planar nonlinear systems with mismatched disturbances. IEEE Control Syst Lett2020; 5(6): 1928–1933.
28.
DuHQianCLiS, et al. Global sampled-data output feedback stabilization for a class of uncertain nonlinear systems. Automatica2019; 99: 403–411.
29.
ZhuJQianC.Local asymptotic stabilization for a class of uncertain upper-triangular systems. Automatica2020; 118: 108954.
30.
MengQQianCSunZY, et al. A homogeneous domination output feedback control method for active suspension of intelligent electric vehicle. Nonlinear Dyn2021; 103: 1627–1644.
31.
WangQMengQChenL, et al. Homogeneous domination-based lateral stability control method for electric vehicle lane keeping system. IEEE Access2022; 10: 125564–125575.
32.
MengQSunZShenZ, et al. Homogeneous domination-based lane-keeping control method for intelligent vehicle. Nonlinear Dyn2023; 111(7): 6349–6362.
33.
ZhaoGSuZSunZ, et al. Homogeneous domination control for uncertain nonlinear systems via interval homogeneity with monotone degrees. IEEE Access2020; 8: 48632–48641.
34.
AlimhanKMamyrbayevOJAbdenovaGA, et al. Output tracking control for high-order nonlinear systems with time delay via output feedback design. Symmetry2021; 13(4): 675.
35.
SunZLiuCSuS, et al. Global finite-time stabilization for uncertain systems with unknown measurement sensitivity. IEEE Trans Cybern2021; 52(8): 7602–7611.
36.
KawskiM.Homogeneous stabilizing feedback laws. Control Theory Adv Technol1990; 6(4): 497–516.
37.
HermesH.Homogeneous coordinates and continuous asymptotically stabilizing feedback control. In: ElaydiS (ed.) Differential equations, stability and control. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, 1991, pp.249–260.
38.
HardyGHLittlewoodJEPólyaG.Inequalities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1952.
39.
QianCLinW.Recursive observer design, homogeneous approximation, and nonsmooth output feedback stabilization of nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control2006; 51(9): 1457–1471.
WangYZhangTYinY, et al. Reducing shimmy oscillation of a dual-wheel nose landing gear based on torsional nonlinear energy sink. Nonlinear Dyn2024; 112(6): 4027–4062.
