Focusing on the propulsion requirements and power balance of heavy-duty vehicles used in construction, mining, emergency response, and off-road transport, this study defines distinct optimization objectives for Electro-Mechanical Transmission (EMT) systems under diverse driving patterns.These objectives are synthesized into a multi-criteria optimization framework using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), which dynamically determines weighting coefficients across diverse operating conditions. Based on Dynamic Programming (DP) theory, a multi-objective global control strategy is developed to optimize performance under complex driving cycles. The proposed strategy is evaluated through comprehensive simulations under measured representative driving cycles and is compared with the conventional rule-based strategy.
KimDMBenolielPKimDK, et al. Framework development of series hybrid powertrain design for heavy-duty vehicle considering driving conditions. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2019; 68(7): 6468–6480. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2019.2914868
2.
QieTWangWYangC, et al. A heavy-duty tracked vehicle model with a reduced feasible domain for motion tracking control considering dynamic characters of hybrid powertrain. Adv Eng Inform2024; 62: 102760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2024.102760
3.
HanRHeHZhangZ, et al. A multi-objective hierarchical energy management strategy for a distributed fuel-cell hybrid electric tracked vehicle. J Energy Storage2024; 76: 109858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.109858
4.
EomBEomKYangD, et al. Novel electric vehicle powertrain of multi-stack fuel cell using optimal energy management strategy. Int J Automot Technol2024; 25(2): 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-024-0017-2
5.
LiuGShenSLiuY, et al. Energy-saving control of intelligent connected plug-in hybrid electric vehicle via fusing driving intention of front vehicle. Green Energy Intell Transp2025; 5: 100330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geits.2025.100330
6.
JiaYLiuYZhangY, et al. Lane changing enabled eco-driving control for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle under consecutive signalized intersection conditions. Green Energy Intell Transp2025; 5(1): 100311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geits.2024.100311
7.
LiuHXuRHanL, et al. Control strategy for an electromechanical transmission vehicle based on a double Markov process. Int J Automot Technol2021; 22(3): 761–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-021-0069-7
8.
XieJLiangZZhaoK, et al. Multi-objective optimization method with multi control variables and its application in configuration comparison of combination HEV. Int J Automot Technol2023; 24(6): 1493–1507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-023-0127-4
9.
LyuSParkDYangL, et al. Sufficient conditions for speed optimization based on Pontryagin's minimum principle in battery electric vehicles. Int J Automot Technol2025; 26(3): 649–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-025-0055-8
10.
LinCCPengHGrizzleJW, et al. Power management strategy for a parallel hybrid electric truck. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2003; 11(6): 839–849. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2003.815606
11.
MaCYanDSunT, et al. Development of multi-source information fusion based novel energy management strategy for 4WD PHEV. Int J Automot Technol2025; 26(1): 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-025-0017-1
12.
ChenZMiCXuJ, et al. Energy management for a power-split plug-in hybrid electric vehicle based on dynamic programming and neural networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2014; 63(4): 1567–1580. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2013.2287101
13.
ZhangSXiongR. Adaptive energy management of a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle based on driving pattern recognition and dynamic programming. Appl Energy2015; 155: 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.117
14.
WangYLiJZhengC, et al. Deep reinforcement learning-based energy management strategy for hybrid electric vehicles considering terrain information. Energy2024; 288: 129758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129758
15.
HeXLvC. Toward personalized decision making for autonomous vehicles: a constrained multi-objective reinforcement learning technique. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol2023; 156: 104352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2023.104352
16.
KhosraviNOubelaidA. Deep learning-driven estimation and multi-objective optimization of lithium-ion battery parameters for enhanced EV/HEV performance. Energy2025; 320: 135147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.135147
17.
AnkarSJPinkymolK. Optimal sizing and energy management of electric vehicle hybrid energy storage systems with multi-objective optimization criterion. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2024; 73(8): 11082–11096. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2024.3385347
18.
MosammamZMAhmadiPHoushfarE. Multi-objective optimization-driven machine learning for charging and V2G pattern for plug-in hybrid vehicles: Balancing battery aging and power management. J Power Sources2024; 608: 234639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234639
19.
HuangJLiuYLiuM, et al. Multi-objective optimization control of distributed electric drive vehicles based on optimal torque distribution. IEEE Access2019; 7: 16377–16394. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2895550
20.
ZhouXQinDHuJ. Multi-objective optimization design and performance evaluation for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle powertrains. Appl Energy2017; 208: 1608–1625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.024
21.
LuXChenYFuM, et al. Multi-objective optimization-based real-time control strategy for battery/ultracapacitor hybrid energy management systems. IEEE Access2019; 7: 11640–11650. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2892122
22.
ChenZMiCCXiongR, et al. Dynamic weight-based multi-objective energy management strategy for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Appl Energy2023; 334: 120684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120684
23.
LiuHLiuRXuR, et al. Hierarchical energy management strategy considering switching schedule for a dual-mode hybrid electric vehicle. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automob Eng2022; 236(5): 938–949. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544070211027162.
24.
ZhangSXiongRSunF. Energy management of heavy-duty hybrid electric vehicles: A review and outlook. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2024; 189: 113881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113881
25.
PoongothaiPNandakumarCPonnusamyR. Decision-making for electric vehicle selection using AHP-MABAC-fuzzy integration. In: 2023 International Conference on Data Science, Agents & Artificial Intelligence (ICDSAAI). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDSAAI59313.2023.10421242
26.
ZhangLLiJWangX, et al. Multi-criteria decision-making for optimal sizing and configuration of hybrid energy storage systems in heavy-duty vehicles using AHP. Appl Energy2024; 358: 122589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122589
PatilTDVinotEEhrenbergerS, et al. Sensitivity analysis of battery aging for model-based PHEV use scenarios. Energies2023; 16(4): 1749. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041749
29.
LiuJPengH. Modeling and control of a power-split hybrid vehicle. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2008; 16(6): 1242–1251. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2008.919447
