Design of piping system requires a systematic consideration of various factors as addressed by the codes and standards. This research paper aims to provide a method for flexibility analysis of a selected area of process piping at an industrial plant. Analysis is done for the purpose of accommodating a spare heat exchanger in the process layout. The analysis follows a systematic procedure, with preparation of a tentative model of the system on CAESAR II software followed by insertion of different pipe supports. The selection and location of these supports is based on the results obtained from displacement, stress, reaction and equipment nozzle analysis of the piping system. The design is in accordance with ASME B31.3, which is the standard code for process piping. The proposed method can be adapted for piping configuration of any industrial plant. With the provision of a systematic procedure, the method ensures time saving and efficient flexibility analysis of any piping system.
SharmaPTiwariMSharmaK. Design and analysis of a process plant piping system. Int J Curr Eng Technol2014; Special Issue: 31–39.
2.
ChienDCHDouglasPLPenlidisA. A method for flexibility analysis of continuous processing plants. Can J Chem Eng1991; 69: 58–66.
3.
IbrahimRA. Overview of mechanics of pipes conveying fluids - Part 1: Fundamental studies. J Press Vess Technol2010; 132: 034001–034001–32.
4.
BhendeGTembhareG. Stress intensification and flexibility in pipe stress analysis. Int J Modern Eng Res2013; 3: 1324–1329.
5.
Li GQ, Hua B, Liu BL, et al. Study for flexibility analysis method in heat exchangers network. In Tsatsaronis G (ed.) The second biennial European joint conference on engineering systems design and analysis 1994, volume 1. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1994, pp. 79–86.
6.
KovesWJ. Process piping design: A century of progress. J Press Vess Technol2000; 122: 325–328.
7.
Sitandung YB and Bandriyana B. Analysis of pipe stress using CAESAR II code. In: Proceedings of the 8 National Seminar on Technology and Safety of Nuclear Power Plants and Nuclear Facilities, Indonesia, 2002: 415.
8.
Rossheim DB and Markl ARC. The significance of, and suggested limits for, the stress in pipe lines due to the combined effects of pressure and expansion. Trans ASME 1940; 443–460.
9.
Markl ARC. Piping-flexibility analysis. Trans ASME 1995; 127–149.
10.
OwensRH. An elementary development of piping flexibility analysis with illustrative example. J Am Soc Naval Engrs1960; 72: 159–170.
11.
BoyleJSpenceJ. Inelastic analysis methods for piping systems. Nucl Eng Des1980; 57: 369–390.
12.
NatarajanR. A simplified pipe flexibility analysis program - Stiffness method. Comput Struct1986; 22: 299–305.
13.
Peng LC. The art of checking pipe stress computer programs. In: Design and analysis of piping and components, 1989.
14.
HarteAMcNamaraJ. Modeling procedures for the stress analysis of flexible pipe cross sections. J Offshore Mech Arctic Eng1993; 115: 46–51.
15.
Robleto RA. Reduction in stresses shown in piping programs in large diameter pipe branch connections by applying flexibilities computed by shell finite element analysis. In: ASME/JSME pressure vessels and piping conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 2004.
16.
AlvaradoMRodríguez-ToralMARosasAet al.Decision-making on pipe stress analysis enabled by knowledge-based systems. Knowledge Inform Syst2007; 12: 255–278.
17.
Kumar A, Mishra R, Kurian TA, et al. Flexibility analysis of pipe lines of bunsen section of iodine-sulfur thermochemical process. In: Transactions, SMiRT 21 2011, India, 2011.
18.
Li F, Liu Y and Xing J. Thermal analysis and stress analysis of the heat-exchange pipe based on ANSYS. In: Fourth international conference on information and computing, Thailand, 2011.
19.
ShehadehBRanganathanSIAbedFH. Optimization of piping expansion loops using ASME B31.3. Proc IMechE, Part E: J Process Mechanical Engineering2014; 230: 56–64.
20.
de C e Sousa CEA. Piping flexibility analysis and the development of PCS - Pipe Calculation System for abaqus. In: SIMULA community conference, Germany, 2015.
21.
Choudhury BN. Flexibility analysis of piping systems with discontinuities in displacement. In: Proceedings of the ASME pressure vessels and piping conference, Canada, 2016.
22.
BhaveSU. Calculation methodologies for the design of piping systems. Int J Eng Res Gen Sci2014; 2: 596–603.
23.
VakhariaDPFarooqMA. Determination of maximum span between pipe supports using maximum bending stress theory. Int J Recent Trends Eng2009; 1: 46–49.
24.
SchwarzMM. Flexibility analysis of the vessel-piping interface. Int J Press Vess Piping2004; 81: 181–189.
25.
SheremetovLBatyrshinIChiMet al.Knowledge-based collaborative engineering of pipe networks in the upstream and downstream petroleum industry. Comput Ind2008; 59: 936–948.
26.
SmithE. The effect of pipe bends on the elastic flexibility of a piping system. Int J Press Vess Piping1991; 45: 121–129.
27.
WeissEJoostH. Local and global flexibility of nozzle-to-vessel-intersections under local loads as boundary conditions for piping system design. Int J Press Vess Piping1997; 73: 241–247.
28.
BeerFPJohnstonERDeWolfJT. Mechanics of materials, New York: McGraw Hill, 2001.
29.
HearnEJ. Mechanics of materials, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1985.
30.
ASME Code B31.3-2006. Process piping.
31.
BechtCDiehlDW. New piping flexibility rules in ASME B31.3, Appendix P. J Press Vess Technol2005; 128: 84–88.
32.
Woods GE and Baguley RB. Practical guide to ASME B31.3 process piping. ASME.
