Analysis of contact and bending stiffness for Curvic couplings considering contact angle and surface roughness

Abstract

This paper develops a method for calculating the contact and bending stiffness of a Curvic coupling, and investigates stiffness changes according to the coupling shape and surface roughness characteristics. The surface of the on-site Curvic coupling is chosen as reference for a most accurate simulation. The three parameters representing the surface roughness characteristics—the standard deviation of the asperity height distribution, the average radius of asperities, and the density of asperity on the nominal contact area—are calculated with a profile of the coupling surface through a random process: the contact problem between rough surfaces is tackled using the Greenwood-Williamson model, the Curvic coupling is modeled assuming that it has as many teeth as possible within the machining limits depending on the contact angle, and the tangential stiffness resulting from the contact angle is calculated by dividing into the stick and slip regions, and is taken into account in terms of total stiffness. With this, results showed that using Curvic couplings reduces stiffness than using flat disc couplings because of the contact angle, and that the standard deviation of rough surface height is the most crucial surface parameter affecting stiffness.

Keywords

Curvic coupling contact stiffness bending stiffness surface roughness Greenwood-Williamson model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Yuan

S-X

Zhang

Y-Y

Zhang

Y-C

, et al. Stress distribution and contact status analysis of a bolted rotor with curvic couplings. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science 2010; 224: 1815–1829.

Greenwood

Williamson

JBP

. Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc Royal Society of London. A: Math Phys Eng Sci 1966; 295: 300–319.

Nayak

. Some aspects of surface roughness measurement. Wear 1973; 26: 165–174.

Kogut

Etsion

. Elastic-plastic contact analysis of a sphere and a rigid flat. J Appl Mech 2002; 69: 657–662.

Jackson

Green

. A finite element study of elasto-plastic hemispherical contact against a rigid flat. J Tribol 2005; 127: 343–354.

Etsion

Talke

. Contact area and static friction of rough surfaces with high plasticity index. J Tribol 2010; 132: 1–10.

Quicksall

Jackson

Green

. Elasto-plastic hemispherical contact models for various mechanical properties. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology 2004; 218: 313–322.

Wadwalkar

Jackson

Kogut

. A study of the elastic—plastic deformation of heavily deformed spherical contacts. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology 2010; 224: 1091–1102.

Zhao

Zhang

Man

, et al. A modified normal contact stiffness model considering effect of surface topography. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology 2015; 229: 677–688.

10.

Xiao

Yunyun

. An improved virtual material based acoustic model for contact stiffness measurement of rough interface using ultrasound technique. Int J Solids Struct 2018; 155: 240–247.

11.

Peng

Liu

Wang

, et al. Rotor dynamic analysis of tie-bolt fastened rotor based on elastic-plastic contact. In: ASME 2011 Turbo Expo: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. American Soc Mech Eng 2011; 6: 365–373.

12.

Yuan S, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, et al. Study on the equivalent stiffness of heavy-duty gas turbines composite rotor with curvic couplings and spindle tie-bolts. In: ASME 2011 power conference, 2011, pp.567–576.

13.

Gao

Yuan

, et al. Effects of bending moments and pretightening forces on the flexural stiffness of contact interfaces in rod-fastened rotors. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2012; 134: 102503–102503-8.

14.

Jiang

Zhu

Hong

, et al. Development and validation of an analytical model for stiffness analysis of curvic coupling in tightening. J Aerospace Eng 2014; 27: (04014012) 01–14.

15.

Jiang

Zhu

Hong

, et al. Investigation into the loosening mechanism of bolt in curvic coupling subjected to transverse loading. Eng Fail Anal 2013; 32: 360–373.

16.

Works

Rochester

. Curvic coupling design, Rochester, NY: Gleason Works, 1973.

17.

Mindlin

. Compliance of elastic bodies in contact. J Appl Mech 1949; 16: 259–268.

18.

ISO 4288. Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Surface texture: Profile method. Rules and procedures for the assessment of surface texture, London: International British Standards Institute, 1996.