Preventive maintenance is an important means to extend equipment life and improve equipment reliability. Traditional preventive maintenance decision-making is often based on components or the entire system, the granularity is too large and the decision-making is not accurate enough. The meta-action unit is more refined than the component or system, so the maintenance decision-making based on the meta-action unit is more accurate. Therefore, this paper takes the meta-action unit as the research carrier, considers the imperfect preventive maintenance, based on the hybrid hazard rate model, established the imperfect preventive maintenance optimization model of the meta-action unit, and the optimization solution algorithm was given for the maintenance strategy. Finally, through numerical analysis, the validity of the model is verified, and the influence of different maintenance costs on the optimal maintenance strategy and optimal maintenance cost rate is analyzed.
RuschelESantosEAPLouresE. Industrial maintenance decision-making: A systematic literature review. J Manuf Syst2017; 45: 180–194.
2.
LiXRanYZhangG, et al.Selective maintenance of multi-state series systems considering maintenance quality uncertainty and failure effects. Proc IMechE, Part E: J Process Mechanical Engineering2021; 235: 1363–1374.
3.
CarloF DeArleoMA. Imperfect maintenance models, from theory to practice. In: System reliability. London: Intech, 2017.
4.
BaekSHChoSSKimHS, et al.Reliability design of preventive maintenance scheduling for cumulative fatigue damage. J Mech Sci Technol2009; 23: 1225–1233.
5.
LeeHChaJH. New stochastic models for preventive maintenance and maintenance optimization. Eur J Oper Res2016; 255: 80–90.
6.
DaneshkhahAStocksNGJeffreyP. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of optimised preventive maintenance strategies for deteriorating infrastructure assets. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2017; 163: 33–45.
7.
HamdanKTavangarMAsadiM. Optimal preventive maintenance for repairable weighted k-out-of-n systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2021; 205: 107267.
8.
LiuPWangG. Optimal periodic preventive maintenance policies for systems subject to shocks. Appl Math Model2021; 93: 101–114.
9.
JinHHanFSangY. An optimal maintenance strategy for multi-state deterioration systems based on a semi-Markov decision process coupled with simulation technique. Mech Syst Signal Process2020; 139: 106570.
10.
HavingaMJAde JongeB. Condition-based maintenance in the cyclic patrolling repairman problem. Int J Prod Econ2020; 222: 107497.
11.
GeELiQZhangG, et al.Optimal condition-based maintenance strategy for degraded systems considering imperfect maintenance. Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin2013; 34: 316–324.
12.
ShiYZhuWXiangY, et al.Condition-based maintenance optimization for multi-component systems subject to a system reliability requirement. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2020; 202: 107042.
13.
LiXRanYWanF,et al.Condition-based maintenance strategy optimization of meta-action unit considering imperfect preventive maintenance based on Wiener process. Flex Serv Manuf J2021; DOI: 10.1007/s10696-021-09407-w.
14.
KendaMKlobDBraD. Condition based maintenance of the two-beam laser welding in high volume manufacturing of piezoelectric pressure sensor. J Manuf Syst2021; 59: 117–126.
15.
FauriatWZioE. Optimization of an aperiodic sequential inspection and condition-based maintenance policy driven by value of information. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2020; 204: 107133.
16.
ZhangYShenJMaY. An optimal preventive maintenance policy for a two-stage competing-risk system with hidden failures. Comput Ind Eng2021; 154: 107135.
17.
CastanierBGrallABérenguerC. A condition-based maintenance policy with non-periodic inspections for a two-unit series system. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2005; 87: 109–120.
18.
LinZLHuangYS. Nonperiodic preventive maintenance for repairable systems. Nav Res Logist2010; 57: 615–625.
19.
WangH. A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems. Eur J Oper Res2002; 139: 469–489.
20.
WuSZuoMJ. Linear and nonlinear preventive maintenance models. IEEE Trans Reliab2010; 59: 242–249.
21.
NakagawaT. Optimum preventive maintenance policies for repairable systems. IEEE Trans Reliab1977; 26: 168–173.
22.
WangGJZhangYLYamRCM. Preventive maintenance models based on the generalized geometric process. IEEE Trans Reliab2017; 66: 1380–1388.
WangXMemberSZhouH,et al.Imperfect preventive maintenance policies with unpunctual execution. IEEE Trans Reliab2020; 99: 1–13.
26.
LinDZuoMJYamRCM. General sequential imperfect preventive maintenance models. Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng2000; 7: 253–266.
27.
HuangALiQLiT, et al.Optimization of periodic preventive maintenance policies for deteriorating repairable system. Syst Eng Electron2014; 36: 1103–1107.
28.
HongzhouWangPhamH. Reliability and optimal maintenance. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. London: Springer, 2006.
SunQYeZSPengW. Scheduling preventive maintenance considering the saturation effect. IEEE Trans Reliab2019; 68: 741–752.
31.
ZhouXWuCLiY, et al.A preventive maintenance model for leased equipment subject to internal degradation and external shock damage. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2016; 154: 1–7.
32.
ChaJHFinkelsteinM. Optimal long-run imperfect maintenance with asymptotic virtual age. IEEE Trans Reliab2016; 65: 187–196.
33.
SheuSHChangCC. Extended periodic imperfect preventive maintenance model of a system subjected to shocks. Int J Syst Sci2010; 41: 1145–1153.
34.
WangJZhangXZengJ, et al.Optimal dynamic imperfect preventive maintenance of wind turbines based on general renewal processes. Int J Prod Res2020; 58: 6791–6810.
35.
ZhangXZhangGLiY,et al.A novel fault diagnosis approach of a mechanical system based on meta-action unit. Adv Mech Eng2019; 11: 1–12.
36.
LiYZhangXRanY,et al.Reliability and modal analysis of key meta-action unit for CNC machine tool. IEEE Access2019; 7: 23640–23655.
37.
YuHZhangGRanY. A more reasonable definition of failure mode for mechanical systems using meta-action. IEEE Access2019; 7: 4898–4904.
38.
LiXRanYYuH,et al.Maintenance decision of meta-action unit based on grey-BWM. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Xian, China, 8–11 October 2020, p. 032032.
39.
YuHZhangGRanY,et al.A reliability allocation method for mechanical product based on meta-action. IEEE Trans Reliab2020; 69: 373–381.
40.
RanYZhangTMuZ,et al.Quality characteristic decoupling planning of different meta-action units for computer numerical control machine tool. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2020; 234: 2760–2770.
41.
LinDZuoMJYamRCM. Imperfect preventive maintenance model with two modes of failure. Nav Res Logist2012; 3: 492–495.
