In this study, different resistance spot welding joints were made on DC01 steel with welding parameters of 8–10–12 kA welding currents and 1.96–2.94 kN electrode forces. Measurements of the nugget diameter and tests of the tensile shear were performed. Also, various failure modes were determined. The importance of welding parameters on the value of the tensile shear force was determined, and a statistical model was established with the ANOVA study. The microstructure of the joint was characterized by optical and scanning electron microscopes. As a result, the nugget diameter and the tensile shear force were increased with an increase in the welding current and the electrode force. Two failure modes, namely, interfacial and plug failures, were observed. The effect of the electrode force was higher than the welding current on the tensile shear force. The base material was densely composed of the ferrite phase, heat-affected, and the fusion zone consisted of the coarse ferrite phase.
BoriwalLSarviyaRMMahapatraMM. Process analysis and regression modelling of resistance spot welded joints of austenitic stainless steel 304L and low carbon steel sheets by using surface response methodology. Proc Inst Mech Eng E: J Process Mech Eng2021; 235: 24–33.
2.
EisazadehHHamediMHalvaeeA. New parametric study of nugget size in resistance spot welding process using finite element method. Mater Des2010; 31: 149–157.
3.
MoshayediHSattari-FarI. Numerical and experimental study of nugget size growth in resistance spot welding of austenitic stainless steels. J Mater Process Technol2012; 212: 347–354.
4.
KrishnanVAyyasamyEParamasivamV. Influence of resistance spot welding process parameters on dissimilar austenitic and duplex stainless steel welded joints. Proc Inst Mech Eng E: J Process Mech Eng2021; 235: 12–23.
5.
RaoelisonRNFuentesAPouvreauC, et al.Modeling and numerical simulation of the resistance spot welding of zinc coated steel sheets using rounded tip electrode: analysis of required conditions. Appl Math Model2014; 38: 2505–2521.
6.
YuanXLiCChenJ, et al.Resistance spot welding of dissimilar DP600 and DC54D steels. J Mater Process Technol2017; 239: 31–41.
7.
DancetteSFabrègueDMassardierV, et al.Experimental and modeling investigation of the failure resistance of advanced high strength steels spot welds. Eng Fract Mech2011; 78: 2259–2272.
8.
BoriwalLSarviyaRMMahapatraMM. Weld bonding process analysis for tensile shear strength and peel strength of weld bonded joints of dissimilar steel sheets. Proc Inst Mech Eng E: J Process Mech Eng2019; 233: 709–717.
9.
ZhouMZhangHHuSJ. Relationships between quality and attributes of spot welds. Weld J2003; 82: 72–77.
10.
KhanMIKuntzMLSuP, et al.Resistance and friction stir spot welding of DP600: a comparative study. Sci Technol Weld Joining2007; 12: 175–182.
MarashiPPouranvariMAmirabdollahianS, et al.Microstructure and failure behavior of dissimilar resistance spot welds between low carbon galvanized and austenitic stainless steels. Mater Sci Eng A2008; 480: 175–180.
13.
VermaRAroraKSSharmaL, et al.Experimental investigation on resistance spot welding of dissimilar weld joints. Proc Inst Mech Eng E: J Process Mech Eng2021; 235: 505–513.
14.
DaneshpourSRiekehrSKocakM, et al.Mechanical and fatigue behaviour of laser and resistance spot welds in advanced high strength steels. Sci Technol Weld Joining2009; 14: 20–25.
15.
ValeraJMiguelVMartínezA, et al.Optimization of electrical parameters in resistance spot welding of dissimilar joints of micro-alloyed steels TRIP sheets. Procedia Manuf2017; 13: 291–298.
16.
BudionoYKMartowibowoSY. Optimization of resistance spot welding process using response surface methodology and simulated annealing. Manuf Technol2017; 17: 434–440.
17.
KaščákLSpišákEMuchaJ. Clinchrivet as an alternative method to resistance spot welding. Acta Mechanica Et Automatica2013; 7: 79–82.
18.
KaščákLViňášJMišičkoR. Influence of welding current in resistance spot welding on the properties of Zn coated steel DX51D. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol2016; 38: 237–242.
19.
SpišákEKaščákLViňášJ. Research into properties of joints of combined materials made by resistance spot welding. Chemické listy2011; 105: 488–490.
20.
AmbroziakATobotaATokarzK, et al.Testing of thin-walled steel joints fabricated by spot welding and plug welding. Weld Int2011; 25: 277–282.
21.
PouranvariMMarashiSPH. Similar and dissimilar RSW of low carbon and austenitic stainless steels: effect of weld microstructure and hardness profile on failure mode. Mater Sci Technol2009; 25: 1411–1416.
22.
KumarKSRavikanthTNPrashanthB, et al.Experimental investigation on spot welding of mild, cold rolled steel and galvanised iron sheets. Int J Mech Eng Technol2017; 8: 574–580.
PouranvariMMarashiSPH. Failure mode transition in AHSS resistance spot welds. Part I. Controlling factors. Mater Sci Eng A2011; 528: 8337–8343.
27.
PouranvariMMarashiSPH. Critical review of automotive steels spot welding: process, structure and properties. Sci Technol Weld Joining2013; 18: 361–403.
28.
HilditchTBSpeerJMatlockDK. Effect of susceptibility to interfacial fracture on fatigue properties of spot-welded high strength sheet steel. Mater Des2007; 28: 2566–2576.
29.
LongXKhannaSK. Fatigue properties and failure characterization of spot welded high strength steel sheet. Int J Fatigue2007; 29: 879–886.
30.
KuangJHLiuAH. A study of the stress concentration factor on spot welds. Weld J1990; 69: 468–474.
31.
FukumotoSFujiwaraKTojiS, et al.Small-scale resistance spot welding of austenitic stainless steels. Mater Sci Eng A2008; 492: 243–249.
32.
SunDQLangBSunDX, et al.Microstructures and mechanical properties of resistance spot welded magnesium alloy joints. Mater Sci Eng A2007; 460: 494–498.
33.
ZhaoDWangYLiangD, et al.An investigation into weld defects of spot-welded dual-phase steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2017; 92: 3043–3050.
34.
ElitasM. Effects of welding parameters on tensile properties and fracture modes of resistance spot welded DP1200 steel. Mater Test2021; 63: 124–130.
35.
SejčPGábrišováZ. Optimization of RSW parameters by joining galvanized steel HZ 220 BD-Z100 MB with aluminium AV 1050A. Kovove Mater-Metall Mater2018; 56: 145–152.
36.
PouranvariMMarashiSPH. Minimum fusion zone size required to ensure pullout failure mode of resistance spot welds during tensile-shear test. Kovove Mater-Metall Mater2010; 48: 197–202.
37.
PouranvariMAsgariHRMosavizadchSM, et al.Effect of weld nugget size on overload failure mode of resistance spot welds. Sci Technol Weld Joining2007; 12: 217–225.
38.
DancetteSFabregueDMassardierV, et al.Investigation of the tensile shear fracture of advanced high strength steel spot welds. Eng Fail Anal2012; 25: 112–122.
39.
PouranvariMMarashiSPHMousavizadehSM. Failure mode transition and mechanical properties of similar and dissimilar resistance spot welds of DP600 and low carbon steels. Sci Technol Weld Joining2010; 15: 625–631.
40.
PouranvariMMarashiSPHMousavizadehSM. Dissimilar resistance spot welding of DP600 dual phase and AISI 1008 low carbon steels: correlation between weld microstructure and mechanical properties. Ironmak Steelmak2011; 38: 471–480.
41.
EshraghiMTschoppMAZaeemMA, et al.Effect of resistance spot welding parameters on weld pool properties in a DP600 dual-phase steel: a parametric study using thermomechanically-coupled finite element analysis. Mater Design (1980–2015)2014; 56: 387–397.
42.
ThakurAGNandedkarVM. Optimization of the resistance spot welding process of galvanized steel sheet using the Taguchi method. Arab J Sci Eng2014; 39: 1171–1176.
43.
ZhangXQChenGLZhangYS. Characteristics of electrode wear in resistance spot welding dual-phase steels. Mater Des2008; 29: 279–283.
44.
EşmeU. Application of taguchi method for the optimization of resistance spot welding process. Arab J Sci Eng2009; 34: 519–528.
45.
ChakrabortyGPalTKShomeM. Microstructure development in resistance spot welded galvannealed IF steel sheet. Mater Sci Technol2011; 27: 382–386.
46.
MaCChenDLBholeSD, et al.Microstructure and fracture characteristics of spot-welded DP600 steel. Mater Sci Eng A2008; 485: 334–346.
47.
AlzahougiAElitasMDemirB. RSW Junctions of advanced automotive sheet steel by using different electrode pressures. Eng Technol Appl Sci Res2018; 8: 3492–3495.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
