Multiobjective optimization of magnetic abrasive finishing process with periodic re-distribution of magnetic abrasive particles on 17-4PH stainless steel
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024
Multiobjective optimization of magnetic abrasive finishing process with periodic re-distribution of magnetic abrasive particles on 17-4PH stainless steel
Magnetic abrasive finishing (MAF) exhibits considerable potential as a promising process for enhancing surface finish quality for softer as well as harder materials. This work proposes a novel approach to harness the potential of MAF for obtaining superior surface quality of precipitation-hardening martensitic steel (17-4PH steel) while performing periodic re-distribution of magnetic abrasive particles. The experiments were conducted using the Box-Behnken design of experiments and response surface methodology (RSM). RSM-based desirability function approach and genetic algorithms were used for multiobjective optimization. The set of pareto-optimal solutions obtained through multiobjective optimization were ranked using the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) by assigning equal importance to the selected performance parameters (percentage change in surface roughness (PCSR) and material removal rate (MRR)). The optimized values of PCSR and MRR obtained through the desirability function of RSM and genetic algorithm were validated experimentally and compared with the predicted values obtained through the regression model. Results showed that the desirability function of RSM provided better results than the genetic algorithm for the selected conditions and confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
MohantyAGangopadhyaySThakurA. On applicability of multilayer coated tool in dry machining of aerospace grade stainless steel. Mater Manuf Processes2016; 31: 869–879.
2.
SunYHebertRJAindowM. Effect of heat treatments on microstructural evolution of additively manufactured and wrought 17-4PH stainless steel. Mater Des2018; 156: 429–440.
3.
ChinchanikarSChoudhurySK. Machining of hardened steel—experimental investigations, performance modeling and cooling techniques: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2015; 89: 95–109.
4.
WalczakMSzalaM. Effect of shot peening on the surface properties, corrosion and wear performance of 17-4PH steel produced by DMLS additive manufacturing. Arch Civ Mech Eng2021; 21: 157.
5.
TrzepiecińskiTPiejaTMalinowskiT, et al.Investigation of 17-4PH steel microstructure and conditions of elevated temperature forming of turbine engine strut. J Mater Process Technol2018; 252: 191–200.
6.
ChienW-TTsaiC-S. The investigation on the prediction of tool wear and the determination of optimum cutting conditions in machining 17-4PH stainless steel. J Mater Process Technol2003; 140: 340–345.
7.
BagehornSWehrJMaierHJ. Application of mechanical surface finishing processes for roughness reduction and fatigue improvement of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V parts. Int J Fatigue2017; 102: 135–142.
8.
HeoJ-SKooYChoiS-S. Grinding characteristics of conventional and ELID methods in difficult-to-cut and hardened brittle materials. J Mater Process Technol2004; 155-156: 1196–1200.
9.
SuJXWangYSZhangXF, et al.Selection on surfactant in polishing slurry for chemical mechanical polishing 304 stainless steel. Key Eng Mater2020; 866: 125–134.
10.
LiuGHuangCZouB, et al.Surface integrity and fatigue performance of 17-4PH stainless steel after cutting operations. Surf Coat Technol2016; 307: 182–189.
11.
YangK-TKimM-KKimD,et al.Investigation of laser powder bed fusion manufacturing and post-processing for surface quality of as-built 17-4PH stainless steel. Surf Coat Technol2021; 422: 127492.
12.
OpozTTBurgessAAhuir-TorresJI, et al.The effect of surface finish and post-processing on mechanical properties of 17-4PH stainless steel produced by the atomic diffusion additive manufacturing process (ADAM). Int J Adv Manuf Tech2024; 130: 4053–4066.
13.
CarterTJ. Common failures in gas turbine blades. Eng Fail Anal2005; 12: 237–247.
14.
RouniyarAKShandilyaP. Experimental investigation on recast layer and surface roughness on aluminum 6061 alloy during magnetic field assisted powder mixed electrical discharge machining. J Mater Eng Perform2020; 29: 7981–7992.
15.
Amineh SKTehrani AFMohammadiA. Improving the surface quality in wire electrical discharge machined specimens by removing the recast layer using magnetic abrasive finishing method. Int J Adv Manuf Tech2013; 66: 1793–1803.
16.
HengLKimYJMunSD. Review of superfinishing by the magnetic abrasive finishing process. High Speed Mach2017; 3: 42–55.
17.
ÇelikMGürünHÇaydaşU,et al.Effect of machining parameters on surface quality of w-edmed Ti6Al4V alloy in ultrasonic assisted magnetic abrasive finishing technique. J Fac Eng Archit Gazi Univ2023; 38: 1849–1865.
18.
SunZFanZTianY, et al.Post-processing of additively manufactured microstructures using alternating-magnetic field-assisted finishing. J Mater Res Technol2022; 19: 1922–1933.
19.
YamaguchiHShinmuraTTakenagaM. Development of a new precision internal machining process using an alternating magnetic field. Prec Eng2003; 27: 51–58.
20.
LinC-TYangL-DChowH-M. Study of magnetic abrasive finishing in free-form surface operations using the Taguchi method. Int J Adv Manuf Tech2007; 34: 122–130.
21.
Amineh SKTehrani AFMohammadiA. Improving the surface quality in wire electrical discharge machined specimens by removing the recast layer using magnetic abrasive finishing method. Int J Adv Manuf Tech2013; 66: 1793–1803.
22.
DvivediAKumarPSinghI. Effect of EDM process parameters on surface quality of Al 6063 SiCp metal matrix composite. Int J Mater Prod Technol2010; 39: 357–377.
23.
JudalKBYadavaY. Experimental investigations into electrochemical magnetic abrasive machining of cylindrical shaped non-magnetic stainless-steel workpiece. Mater Manuf Processes2013; 28: 1095–1101.
24.
KalaPPandeyPM. Comparison of finishing characteristics of two paramagnetic materials using double disc magnetic abrasive finishing. J Manuf Process2015; 17: 63–77.
25.
WuJZouYSugiyamaH. Study on ultra-precision magnetic abrasive finishing process using low frequency alternating magnetic field. J Magn Magn Mater2015; 386: 50–59.
26.
BarmanADasM. Simulation and experimental investigation of finishing forces in magnetic field assisted finishing process. Mater Manuf Processes2018; 33: 1223–1232.
27.
KwakJ-S. Enhanced magnetic abrasive polishing of non-ferrous metals utilizing a permanent magnet. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2009; 49: 613–618.
28.
ZhangJChaudhariAWangH. Surface quality and material removal in magnetic abrasive finishing of selective laser melted 316L stainless steel. J Manuf Process2019; 45: 710–719.
29.
FarwahaHSDeepakDBrarGS. Process parameter optimization of ultrasonic assisted electrochemical magnetic abrasive finishing of 316L stainless steel. J Phys Conf Ser2019; 1240: 012041.
30.
CaydasUÇelikMKokluU. Investigation of material removal rate and surface roughness in finishing of internal surfaces of AISI 304 L austenitic stainless steel pipes by magnetic abrasives. J Fac Eng Archit Gazi Univ2019; 34: 1214–1225.
31.
AhmadSSingariRMMishraRS. Development of Al2O3-SiO2 based magnetic abrasive by sintering method and its performance on Ti-6Al-4V during magnetic abrasive finishing. Trans IMF2021; 99: 94–101.
32.
DasMJainVKGhoshdastidarPS. Analysis of magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Int J Adv Manuf Tech2008; 38: 613–621.
33.
XieHZouYDongC,et al.Study on the magnetic abrasive finishing process using alternating magnetic field: investigation of mechanism and applied to aluminum alloy plate. Int J Adv Manuf Tech2019; 102: 1509–1520.
34.
XieHZouY. Investigation on finishing characteristics of magnetic abrasive finishing process using an alternating magnetic field. Machines2020; 8: 75.
35.
ZouYXieHDongC,et al.Study on complex micro surface finishing of alumina ceramic by the magnetic abrasive finishing process using alternating magnetic field. Int J Adv Manuf Tech2018; 97: 2193–2202.
36.
WuJZouYSugiyamaH. Study on ultra-precision magnetic abrasive finishing process using low frequency alternating magnetic field. J Magn Magn Mater2015; 386: 50–59.
37.
XieHZouY. Study on the magnetic abrasive finishing process using alternating magnetic field—discussion on the influence of current waveform variation. Int J Adv Manuf Tech2021; 114: 2471–2483.
38.
MajeedMAl-ZubaidiSKhadumAH. Effect of magnetic abrasive finishing with steel balls on the surface improvement of aluminium alloy. Int J Adv Technol Eng Explor2022; 9: 676.
39.
KumarRKommaVR. Development and experimental investigation of magnetic abrasive finishing of 17-4PH steel. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2023; 09544062231208554.
40.
RouniyarAKShandilyaP. Optimization of process parameters in magnetic field assisted powder mixed EDM of aluminium 6061 alloy. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2021; 235: 2998–3014.
41.
KumarRKommaVR. Recent advancements in magnetic abrasive finishing: a critical review. Eng Res Express2024; 6: 012504.
42.
ZelinkoAWelzelFBiermannD,et al.Influence of process parameters and initial surface on magnetic abrasive finishing of flat surfaces on CNC machine tools. J Manuf Mater Process2021; 5: 108.
43.
JainVKKumarPBeheraPK,et al.Effect of working gap and circumferential speed on the performance of magnetic abrasive finishing process. Wear2001; 250: 384–390.
44.
SinghDKJainVKRaghuramV. Parametric study of magnetic abrasive finishing process. J Mater Process Technol2004; 149: 22–29.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
