Influences of carbonaceous reinforcements (graphene and MWCNT) on microstructure,wear,and hardness properties of hybrid nanocomposites in AZ31 magnesium alloy synthesized via friction stir processing
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Influences of carbonaceous reinforcements (graphene and MWCNT) on microstructure,wear,and hardness properties of hybrid nanocomposites in AZ31 magnesium alloy synthesized via friction stir processing
The present study examined the wear and hardness properties of AZ31Mg-+2.0 wt% MWCNT + 0.3 wt% graphene hybrid nanocomposites synthesized through friction stir processing (FSP) with a fixed tool rotation speed of 1200 rpm at intervals of 200 rpm. A comparative analysis of wear and hardness properties of friction stir processed and unprocessed AZ31Mg base matrix was performed. AZ31 Mg is a magnesium alloy primarily composed of magnesium with 3% aluminium and 2% zinc. The AZ31 Mg-multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) graphene composite is a cutting-edge material that combines graphene and MWCNTs with AZ31 magnesium alloy as the matrix. The Vickers hardness tester (AICEYI) was utilized to measure microhardness with a 10.2 kg load and 10- second dwell time. The hybrid AZ31Mg + 2.0 wt% MWCNT + 0.3 wt% graphene nanocomposites exhibited a microhardness of up to 90.6 HV, which was 58.6% higher than that of the base matrix without FSP. Also, results show that adding MWCNT and graphene to AZ31Mg and applying FSP reduced the average grain size from 58.14 to 44.71 µm, achieving a 23% grain refinement due to improved microstructure. The dry sliding wear behavior was carried out at varying loads (10, 15, 20, and 25 N) at a constant distance. The wear resistance of the AZ31Mg-+2.0 wt% MWCNT + 0.3 wt% graphene composite showed a significant improvement compared to the base matrix alloys of AZ31Mg at higher applied loads. The goal of this work was to produce AZ31Mg-+2.0 wt% MWCNT + 0.3 wt% graphene hybrid nanocomposites for a variety of applications including automotive and aerospace engineering, particularly in the field of nanoscience.
PolmearI. Light alloys: from traditional alloys to nanocrystals. Melbourne, Australia: Elsevier, 2005.
2.
GuptaMWongWL. Magnesium-based nanocomposites: lightweight materials of the future. Mater Charact2015; 105: 30–46.
3.
GuptaMLingSN. Magnesium, magnesium alloys, and magnesium composites. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
4.
GuptaMMeenashisundaramGK. Insight into designing biocompatible magnesium alloys and composites: processing, mechanical and corrosion characteristics. Singapore: Springer, 2015.
5.
BembalgeOBPanigrahiSK. Influence of SiC ceramic reinforcement size in establishing wear mechanisms and wear maps of ultrafine grained AA6063 composites. Ceram Int2019; 45: 20091–20104.
6.
MallikarjunaHMRameshCSKoppadPG, et al.Effect of carbon nanotube and silicon carbide on microstructure and dry sliding wear behavior of copper hybrid nanocomposites. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China2016; 26: 3170–3182.
7.
MorisadaYFujiiHNagaokaT, et al.MWCNTs/AZ31 surface composites fabricated by friction stir processing. Mater Sci Eng A2006; 419: 344–348.
8.
ParamsothyMTanXHChanJ, et al.Carbon nanotube addition to concentrated magnesium alloy AZ81: enhanced ductility with occasional significant increase in strength. Mater Des2013; 45: 15–23.
9.
RashadMPanFHuH, et al.Enhanced tensile properties of magnesium composites reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. Mater Sci Eng A2015; 630: 36–44.
10.
SharmaDKPatelVBadhekaV, et al.Fabrication of hybrid surface composites AA6061/(B4C+ MoS2) via friction stir processing. J Tribol2019; 141: 052201.
DongSZhouJHuiD, et al.Size dependent strengthening mechanisms in carbon nanotube reinforced metal matrix composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2015; 68: 356–364.
13.
GuoYXuGYangX, et al.Significantly enhanced and precisely modeled thermal conductivity in polyimide nanocomposites with chemically modified graphene via in situ polymerization and electrospinning-hot press technology. J Mater Chem C2018; 6: 3004–3015.
JiaoYHanDDingY, et al.Fabrication of three-dimensionally interconnected nanoparticle superlattices and their lithium-ion storage properties. Nat Commun2015; 6: 6420.
16.
BrownLJoycePForrestD, et al.Physical and mechanical characterization of a nanocarbon infused aluminum-matrix composite. Mater Perform Charact2014; 3: 65–80.
17.
SankaranarayananSSabatRKJayalakshmiS, et al.Effect of hybridizing micron-sized Ti with nano-sized SiC on the microstructural evolution and mechanical response of Mg–5.6 Ti composite. J Alloys Compd2013; 575: 207–217.
18.
SharmaSHandaASinghSS, et al.Influence of tool rotation speeds on mechanical and morphological properties of friction stir processed nano hybrid composite of MWCNT-graphene-AZ31 magnesium. J Magnes Alloy2019; 7: 487–500.
19.
KostagiannakopoulouCTsilimigkraXSotiriadisG, et al.Synergy effect of carbon nano-fillers on the fracture toughness of structural composites. Compos B Eng2017; 129: 18–25.
20.
LiCChouTW. Elastic moduli of multi-walled carbon nanotubes and the effect of van der Waals forces. Compos Sci Technol2003; 63: 1517–1524.
21.
ShenCOyadijiSO. The processing and analysis of graphene and the strength enhancement effect of graphene-based filler materials: a review. Mater Today Phys2020; 15: 100257.
22.
MorisadaYFujiiHNagaokaT, et al.Effect of friction stir processing with SiC particles on microstructure and hardness of AZ31. Mater Sci Eng A2006; 433: 50–54.
23.
RashadMPanFTangA, et al.Effect of graphene nanoplatelets addition on mechanical properties of pure aluminum using a semi-powder method. Prog Nat Sci-Mater Int2014; 24: 101–108.
24.
SarmadiHKokabiAHReihaniSS. Friction and wear performance of copper–graphite surface composites fabricated by friction stir processing (FSP). Wear2013; 304: 1–12.
25.
TjongSC. Recent progress in the development and properties of novel metal matrix nanocomposites reinforced with carbon nanotubes and graphene nanosheets. Mater Sci Eng R2013; 74: 281–350.
26.
TengXHuoDWongE, et al.Micro-machinability of nanoparticle-reinforced Mg-based MMCs: an experimental investigation. Int J Adv Manuf Tech2016; 87: 2165–2178.
27.
ZhouHWangHDuX, et al.Hybrid three-dimensional graphene fillers and graphite platelets to improve the thermal conductivity and wear performance of epoxy composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2019; 123: 270–277.
28.
KumarDSSasankaCTRavindraK, et al.Magnesium and its alloys in automotive applications—a review. Am J Mater Sci Technol2015; 4: 12–30.
29.
BabuJAnjaiahMMathewA. Experimental studies on friction stir processing of AZ31 magnesium alloy. Mater Today Proc2018; 5: 4515–4522.
30.
WuSLiTWuM, et al.Highly thermally conductive and flexible phase change composites enabled by polymer/graphite nanoplatelet-based dual networks for efficient thermal management. J Mater Chem A2020; 8: 20011–20020.
31.
AmbigaiRPrabhuS. Optimization of friction and wear behaviour of Al–Si3N4 nano composite and Al–Gr–Si3N4 hybrid composite under dry sliding conditions. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China2017; 27: 986–997.
32.
LiMZhouHZhangY, et al.Effect of defects on thermal conductivity of graphene/epoxy nanocomposites. Carbon N Y2018; 130: 295–303.
33.
JamshidijamMAkbari-FakhrabadiAMasoudpanahSM, et al.Wear behavior of multiwalled carbon nanotube/AZ31 composite obtained by friction stir processing. Tribol Trans2013; 56: 827–832.
34.
AbbasAHuangSJBallókováB, et al.Tribological effects of carbon nanotubes on magnesium alloy AZ31 and analyzing aging effects on CNTs/AZ31 composites fabricated by stir casting process. Tribol Int2020; 142: 105982.
35.
XiaoPGaoYYangC, et al.Microstructure, mechanical properties and strengthening mechanisms of Mg matrix composites reinforced with in situ nanosized TiB2 particles. Mater Sci Eng A2018; 710: 251–259.
ASTM E. Standard practice for conducting force controlled constant amplitude axial fatigue tests of metallic materials. West Conshohocken. 2007.
38.
MazaheryAShabaniMO. Study on microstructure and abrasive wear behavior of sintered Al matrix composites. Ceram Int2012; 38: 4263–4269.
39.
RavindranPManisekarKNarayanasamyP, et al.Application of factorial techniques to study the wear of Al hybrid composites with graphite addition. Mater Des2012; 39: 42–54.
40.
SomekawaHMaedaSHirayamaT, et al.Microstructural evolution during dry wear test in magnesium and Mg–Y alloy. Mater Sci Eng A2013; 561: 371–377.
BanerjeeSPoriaSSutradharG, et al.Tribological behavior of Mg-WC nano-composites at elevated temperature. Mater Res Express2019; 6: 0865c6.
43.
DonatusUGThompsonGEZhouX, et al.Flow patterns in friction stir welds of AA5083 and AA6082 alloys. Mater Des2015; 83: 203–213.
44.
RamalingamVVRamasamyPKovukkalMD, et al.Research and development in magnesium alloys for industrial and biomedical applications: a review. Met Mater Int2020; 26: 409–430.
45.
SalvoMFerrarisMLemoineP, et al.Joining of CMCs for thermonuclear fusion applications. J Nucl Mater1996; 233-237: 949–953.
46.
LeiMKLiPYangHG, et al.Wear and corrosion resistance of Al ion implanted AZ31 magnesium alloy. Surf Coat Technol2007; 201: 5182–5185.
47.
PrasadDSShobaCRamanaiahN. Investigations on mechanical properties of aluminum hybrid composites. J Mater Res Technol2014; 3: 79–85.
48.
ImmanuelRJPanigrahiSK. Transformation of cast A356 ingots to wrought sheets with enhanced mechanical and tribological properties by different thermo-mechanical processing routes. Mater Des2016; 101: 44–55.
49.
SahooBNPanigrahiSK. Development of wear maps of in-situ TiC+ TiB2 reinforced AZ91 Mg matrix composite with varying microstructural conditions. Tribol Int2019; 135: 463–477.
50.
BaigZMamatOMustaphaM. Recent progress on the dispersion and the strengthening effect of carbon nanotubes and graphene-reinforced metal nanocomposites: a review. Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci2018; 43: 1–46.
51.
MenezesPLNosonovskyMIngoleSP, et al. (eds). Tribology for scientists and engineers. New York: Springer, 2013.
52.
MorisadaYFujiiHNagaokaT, et al.Fullerene/A5083 composites fabricated by material flow during friction stir processing. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2007; 38: 2097–2101.
53.
BalakrishnanMDinaharanIPalanivelR, et al.Synthesize of AZ31/TiC magnesium matrix composites using friction stir processing. J Magnes Alloy2015; 3: 76–78.
54.
ZhangHJLiuHJYuL. Microstructure and mechanical properties as a function of rotation speed in underwater friction stir welded aluminum alloy joints. Mater Des2011; 32: 4402–4407.
55.
SharmaSKGuptaVTandonRP, et al.Synergic effect of graphene and MWCNT fillers on electromagnetic shielding properties of graphene–MWCNT/ABS nanocomposites. RSC Adv2016; 6: 18257–18265.
56.
BagotiaNChoudharyVSharmaDK. Synergistic effect of graphene/multiwalled carbon nanotube hybrid fillers on mechanical, electrical and EMI shielding properties of polycarbonate/ethylene methyl acrylate nanocomposites. Compos B Eng2019; 159: 378–388.
57.
AroraHSSinghHDhindawBK. Composite fabrication using friction stir processing—a review. Int J Adv Manuf Tech2012; 61: 1043–1055.
58.
KumarKSKailasSV. The role of friction stir welding tool on material flow and weld formation. Mater Sci Eng A2008; 485: 367–374.
59.
SathiskumarRMuruganNDinaharanI, et al.Effect of traverse speed on microstructure and microhardness of Cu/B 4 C surface composite produced by friction stir processing. Trans Indian Inst Met2013; 66: 333–337.
60.
SahraeinejadSIzadiHHaghshenasM, et al.Fabrication of metal matrix composites by friction stir processing with different particles and processing parameters. Mater Sci Eng A2015; 626: 505–513.
61.
ArchardJF. Sliding wear study on the valve-seat insert contact. J Appl Phys1953; 24: 981–988.
62.
JayaramanJKuppusamyRRaoH. Investigation on wear properties of AZ31-MWCNT nanocomposites fabricated through mechanical alloying and powder metallurgy. Sci Eng Compos Mater2016; 23: 61–66.
63.
SharmaSCAnandBKrishnaM. Evaluation of sliding wear behavior of feldspar particle-reinforced magnesium alloy composites. Wear2000; 241: 33–40.
64.
ChenLYKonishiHFehrenbacherA, et al.Novel nanoprocessing route for bulk graphene nanoplatelets reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites. Scr Mater2012; 67: 29–32.
65.
DaraABahubalendruniMAMertensAJ, et al.Numerical and experimental investigations of novel nature inspired open lattice cellular structures for enhanced stiffness and specific energy absorption. Mater Today Commun2022; 31: 103286.
66.
AshokDRaju BahubalendruniMVJohnney MertensA, et al.A novel nature inspired 3D open lattice structure for specific energy absorption. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E: J Process Mech Eng2022; 236: 2434–2440.
67.
LimCYLeoDKAngJJ, et al.Wear of magnesium composites reinforced with nano-sized alumina particulates. Wear2005; 259: 620–625.
68.
PrasadDSShobaC. Hybrid composites—a better choice for high wear resistant materials. J Mater Res Technol2014; 3: 172–178.
ZhangHJZhangZZGuoF. Studies of the influence of graphite and MoS2 on the tribological behaviors of hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabr Arab IC composite. Tribol Trans2011; 54: 417–423.
71.
NguyenQBSimYHGuptaM, et al.Tribology characteristics of magnesium alloy AZ31B and its composites. Tribol Int2015; 82: 464–471.
72.
LimDSYouDHChoiHJ, et al.Effect of CNT distribution on tribological behavior of alumina–CNT composites. Wear2005; 259: 539–544.
73.
TaltavullCTorresBLopezAJ, et al.Relationship between laser parameters-microstructural modification-mechanical properties of laser surface melted magnesium alloy AZ91D. Mater Sci Forum2013; 765: 678–682.
74.
KimKTChaSIHongSH. Hardness and wear resistance of carbon nanotube reinforced Cu matrix nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng A2007; 449-451: 46–50.
75.
DaraAJohnney MertensARaju BahubalendruniMVA. Characterization of penetrate and interpenetrate tessellated cellular lattice structures for energy absorption. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl2023; 237: 906–913.
76.
AshokDBahubalendruniMRMhaskarA, et al.Experimental and numerical investigation on 2.5-dimensional nature-inspired infill structures under out-plane quasi-static loading. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E: J Process Mech Eng2023: 09544089231197853.
