Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive energy-exergy-economic assessment of a recuperated organic Rankine cycle employing bio-alcohol-based binary mixtures 2-propanol/1-butanol, 2-propanol/water, and ethanol/water as environmentally benign alternatives to conventional fluorocarbon refrigerants. The organic Rankine cycle model was developed in Aspen Plus and validated against published experimental literature with deviations below 2%, ensuring model reliability. An integrated framework was applied to evaluate system performance under varying operating conditions. At sub-atmospheric condenser pressure (0.1 bar), ethanol/water (0.5/0.5) achieved the highest turbine power output of 480.9 kW, representing nearly a fourfold increase compared to the conventional R245fa/isopentane blend (127.1 kW). The 2-propanol/water mixture exhibited superior second-law performance, attaining the highest exergetic efficiency (82.65%) and the lowest exergy destruction ratio (1.26), indicating minimal irreversibility. Thermal efficiency for bio-alcohol mixtures increased from approximately 22% at 1 bar to 27–28% at 0.1 bar, demonstrating strong sensitivity to condenser pressure, and the optimal performance is consistently observed near a 0.5 mole fraction of alcohol. Economic analysis reveals that ethanol/water and 2-propanol/water mixtures offer the lowest levelized cost of electricity (0.067 to 0.073 USD/kWh), substantially outperforming conventional R245fa/isopentane blends (0.245 to 0.444 USD/kWh). The findings demonstrate that bio-alcohol-based mixtures, being low-GWP and ODP-free, provide a technically robust and economically competitive solution for sustainable organic Rankine cycle power generation. Future work will focus on supercritical operation, transient performance, and experimental validation.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
