Development of effective performance measures for wayside rail curve lubrication in heavy haul lines

Abstract

Rail curve lubrication using wayside gauge face lubrication systems is widely used by the railway industry. It provides cost-effective solutions to reduce rail/wheel wear, energy consumption, costs and noise. Research efforts on cost-effective friction management solutions for the Australian heavy haul industry have been limited. Therefore, the performance measures necessary for the evaluation of effective gauge face lubrication practice have not been developed. Currently, there are no specific performance measures available for heavy haul rail curve lubrication. Also, the performance of in-rail lubrication seems to be poor in most cases. Appropriate performance measures should be implemented that can accurately demonstrate the actual performance of the lubrication. This paper is focused on the development of effective performance measures based on lubrication theory, maintenance regime, field testings of different wayside lubrication equipment technology and different greases currently used on heavy haul lines. Extensive field tests have been conducted on the Queensland Rail Network’s North Coast Line, which is a dedicated coal line. Data were collected and analysed for the development of performance measures and cost-effective lubrication decisions. The presented performance measures and illustrative examples could be used by other types of railway networks for enhancement of rail/wheel asset life, asset availability, reliability and safety along with reduction of costs.

Keywords

Wayside lubrication performance measures maintenance costs lubrication effectiveness risks friction management

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sid

Wolf

. Transportation for the 21st century, Trac Glide top-of-rail lubrication system. Report, USA Department of Energy, 2002. Washington, DC: Department of Energy.

Daniels LE. Track maintenance costs on rail transit properties. Transit Co-operative Research Program Report, 2008. Fair Oaks, CA: Transport Research Board.

Eadie DT, Lu X, Makowsky TW, et al. Friction management on a Chinese heavy haul coal line. In: The IHHA conference, Calgary, Canada, 21–23 June 2011.

Eadie DT, Lu X, Santoro M and Oldknow K. Wayside gauge face lubrication: how much do we really know? In: The IHHA conference, Calgary, Canada, 21–23 June 2011.

De Koker, J. Development of a formulae to place rail lubricators. In: The fifth international tribology conference, 1994.

Sroba P, Roney M, Dashko R and Magel E. Canadian Pacific Railway's 100% effective lubrication initiative. In: The AREMA conference & exhibition, Chicago, IL, 2001.

Marich S, Mackie S and Fogarty R. The optimisation of rail/wheel lubrication practice in the Hunter Valley. In: The conference on railway engineering, Adelaide, Australia, 21–23 May 2000.

Reiff R. Best practices update for friction control including implementing top-of-rail friction control. In: The AREMA conference 2006, 2006.

Uddin GM, Chattopadhyay G, Rasul MG and Leinster M. Modelling of grease transport mechanism in wayside rail lubrication and impact of related parameters. In: The 2012 CORE Conference, Brislane, Australia, 10–12 September, 2012.

10.

Uddin GM and Chattopadhyay G. Development of economic model for analyzing lubrication effectiveness based on below rail and above rail assets. In: The 2009 ASOR conference, Gold Coast, Australia, 27–30 September 2009.

11.

Sims RD, Miller KA and Schepmann GF. In: The 1996 ASME/IEEE joint railroad conference, Oakbrook, IL, 1996.

12.

IHHA. Guidelines to best practices for heavy haul railway operations: wheel and rail interface issues, Virginia Beach, VA: IHHA, 2001.

13.

DeKoker

. Rail and wheel flange lubrication, Read to South African Permanent Way Institute, October 1993.

14.

Reiff R and Creggor D. Systems approach to best practice for wheel and rail friction control. In: The IHHA conference, Moscow, Russia, 14–17 June 1999.

15.

AAR. Annual research review 1998 and 2000, Pueblo, CO: AAR.

16.

Reddy

Chattopadhyay

Larsson-Kråik

Hargreaves

. Modeling and analysis of rail maintenance cost. Int J Prod Econ 2007; 105: 475–482.

17.

Uddin MG, Chattopadhyay G, Sroba P, et al. Wayside lubricator placement model for heavy haul lines in Australia. In: The CORE conference, Wellington, NZ, 12–14 September 2010.

18.

Hamrock BJ. Fundamentals of fluid film lubrication. NASA reference publication 1255, August 1991.

19.

Maru

Tanaka

. Consideration of Stribeck diagram parameters in the investigation on wear and friction behavior in lubricated sliding. J Brazil Soc Mech Sci Engng 2007; 29(1): 55–66.

20.

Waara P. Lubricants influence on wear in sharp rail curves. PhD Thesis, Lulea University Sweden, 2006.

21.

Powell J. Lubrication investigation Moura line. Civil Engineering Report, Queensland Rail, Civil Engineering Division, May 2002. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Rail.

22.

Transportation Safety Board of Canada. Rail report- 2006-R06C0104, railway investigation report, main-track train derailment, Canadian Pacific Railway freight train CP 803-111, mile 97.4, 31 July 2006. Lytton, British Columbia: Canadian Pacific Railway.

23.

Queensland Rail. Rail and wheel flange lubrication, standard practice no. 3707, Issued 23 May 1995. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Rail.

24.

Uddin MG, Chattopadhyay G, Desai A, et al. Best practice in rail curve lubrication and remote performance monitoring in heavy haul lines. In: The AusRAIL conference, Perth, Australia, 23–24 November 2010.

25.

Uddin MG, Chattopadhyay G, Rasul MG, et al. Friction management best practices for Australian heavy haul lines. In: The IHHA conference, Calgary, Canada, 2011.

26.

Thelen

Lovette

. A parametric study of the lubrication transport mechanism at the rail-wheel interface. Wear 1996; 191(1–2): 113–120.

27.

Stachowiak

Batchelor

. Engineering tribology, Third ed. Burlington, MA: Elsevier, 2005.