Large eddy simulation of the flow around a train passing a stationary freight wagon

Abstract

In this paper, the effect of track spacing on the aerodynamic performance of a stationary double-stacked freight wagon passed by a high-speed passenger train is investigated using large eddy simulation (LES). The passenger train is a 1/20th scale model of an ICE2-shaped high-speed train and consists of nose, two coaches, inter-carriage gap and tail. Based on the speed and height of the passenger train, a flow Reynolds number of 2 × 10⁵ is used in the simulation studies. To isolate the effect of the mesh resolution computations are performed using three different meshes: coarse, medium and fine, consisting of 3.2 × 10⁶, 6.9 × 10⁶ and 9.0 × 10⁶ nodes, respectively. The results are also validated with available experimental data and a good agreement is demonstrated. The aerodynamic loads on the freight containers and passenger train are obtained during a passing process. High side force values are generated on the freight containers when the passenger train approaches followed by a sudden reduction when the nose of the passenger train passes the freight wagons. There is also a reduction in the side force when the tail of the passenger train passes the freight wagon followed by a significant increase when the wake flow hits the freight wagon. Similar behavior is observed for the lift and drag coefficients. The effect of track spacing is investigated by performing simulations at three different track spacing values: 3.5, 4 and 4.5 m. The results show that a reduction in track spacing generally increases the aerodynamic forces on both the freight wagon and passenger train.

Keywords

Large eddy simulation train aerodynamics sliding mesh aerodynamic coefficients train pressure pulses train passing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alam F and Watkins S. Crosswinds effects on high cube freight trains. In: The third BSME-ASME thermal engineering conference, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 20–22 December 2006, paper no. AU-002, pp. 7–12.

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau. Derailment of train 3DA2K – Tarcoola, SA. Report no. 2006/012, February 2008. Canberra, Austrailia: Australian Transport Safety Bureau.

RAIB. Detachment of containers from freight wagons near Cheddington and Hardendale. Report no. 12/2009, May 2009. UK: RAIB, Dept. for Transport.

Tian

Yang

. Aerodynamic drag analysis of double-deck container vehicles with different structures. J Central South Univ Technol 2011; 18: 1311–1315.

Watkins

Saunders

Kumar

. Aerodynamic drag reduction of goods trains. J Wind Engng Ind Aerodyn 1992; 40: 147–178.

Xiong

Liang

. Experimental research on pressure drag of the double container car passing through tunnel. J Exp Fluid Mech 2006; 20: 18–22. In Chinese).

Hemida

Baker

. Large-eddy simulation of the flow around a freight wagon subjected to a crosswind. Comput Fluids 2010; 39: 1944–1956.

Alam F and Watkins S. Lateral stability of a double stacked container wagon under crosswinds. In: The international conference on mechanical engineering, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 29–31 December 2007, pp. 79–85.

Baker

Hemida

Iwnicki

. Integration of crosswind forces into train dynamic modeling. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit 2011; 225: 154–164.

10.

USA Federal Railroad Administration. Assessment potential of aerodynamics effects on personnel and equipment in proximity to high-speed train operations. Report no. DOT/FRA/ORD-99/11, May 1999. Washington, DC: USA Federal Railroad Administration.

11.

Raghunathan

Kim

Setoguchi

. Aerodynamics of high-speed railway trains, review article. Prog Aerosp Sci 2002; 38: 469–514.

12.

Mancini

Malfatti

. Full scale measurements on high speed train ETR 500 passing in open air and in tunnels of Italian high speed line. Notes Numer Fluid Mech 2002; 79: 101–122.

13.

Johnson

Dalley

. 1/25th scale moving model tests for the TRANSAERO project. Notes Numer Fluid Mech 2002; 79: 123–135.

14.

Liu

. Air pressure pulse developing regularity of high-speed trains crossing in open air. Chin J Mech Engng 2011; 47: 125–130. In Chinese).

15.

Tian

. Research and application of air pressure pulse from trains passing each other. J Rail Sci Engng 2004; 1(1): 83–89. In Chinese).

16.

Steinbuer J. Calculation of unsteady pressures during passing and tunnel entrance of trains. In: The Joint ASME-CSME applied mechanics, fluids engineering, and bioengineering conference, Niagara Falls, NY, 18–20 June 1979, pp. 177–191. New York: ASME.

17.

Holmes S and Schroeder M. High speed passenger and intercity train aerodynamic computer modeling. In: The international mechanical engineering congress & exposition, Orlando, FL, 5–10 November 2000, pp. 1–8. New York: ASME.

18.

MacNeill R, Holmes S and Lee H. Measurement of the aerodynamic pressures produced by passing trains. In: The ASME/IEEE joint rail conference. Washington, DC, April 2002, pp. 1–8. New York: ASME.

19.

Schmid

. Best practice in wheel-rail interface management for mixed traffic railways, 1st ed. Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham Press, 2010.

20.

Ministry of Railways of the People’s Republic of China. Management regulations of railway technology, 2007. Beijing, People’s Republic of China: Ministry of Railway.

21.

Cheli

Ripamonti

Rocchi

. Aerodynamic behavior investigation of the new EMUV250 train to cross wind. J. Wind Engng Ind Aerodyn 2010; 98: 189–201.

22.

Hemida H, Krajnovic K and Davidson SL. Large-eddy simulations of the flow around a simplified high speed train under the influence of a cross-wind. In: The 17th AIAA computational fluid dynamics conference, Toronto, Canada, 6–9 June 2005, pp. 2105–2122. paper no. AIAA-2005-5354. USA: AIAA.

23.

Hemida

Gil

Baker

. LES of the slipstream of a rotating train. J Fluids Engng 2010; 132: 1–9.

24.

Muld

Efraimsson

Henningson

. Flow structures around a high-speed train extracted using proper orthogonal decomposition and dynamic mode decomposition. Comput Fluids 2012; 57: 87–97.

25.

Smagorinsky

. General circulation experimental with the primitive equations. Mon Weather Rev 1963; 91: 99–164.

26.

Copley

. The three-dimensional flow around railway trains. J. Wind Engng Ind Aerodyn 1987; 26: 21–52.