A 9-kN magneto-rheological (MR) damper for lateral suspension control of a railway vehicle is created in this paper. The twin-tube style is adopted in order to obtain a long damper stroke and guarantee the symmetry of the output damping force. A bypass MR valve with a radial flow path is utilised to control the generated damping force. Three-dimensional finite element analysis studies are performed to determine the magnetic field strength inside the MR valve region. The MR damper is mathematically modelled for the situation of a unidirectional fluid flow in the chamber and valve. The test results indicate that the MR damper can produce a considerable range of dynamic force and can operate as a fail-safe device. Sedimentation is detected in the damper; however, the response time is acceptable for real-world deployment.
De VicenteJKlingenbergDJHidalgo-AlvarezR. Magnetorheological fluids: a review. Soft Matter2011; 7: 3701–3710.
2.
CarlsonJDCatanzariteDMClairKA. Commercial magnetorheological fluid devices. Int J Mod Phys B1996; 10: 2857–2865.
3.
GudmundssonKJonsdottirFThorsteinssonF. A geometrical optimization of a magneto-rheological rotary brake in a prosthetic knee. Smart Mater Struct2010; 19: 035023–035023.
4.
DykeSJSpencerBFSainMKCarlsonJD. An experimental study of MR dampers for seismic protection. Smart Mater Struct1998; 7: 693–703.
LauYKLiaoWH. Design and analysis of magnetorheological damper for train suspension. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit2005; 219: 261–276.
12.
LiaoWHWangDH. Semi active vibration control of train suspension systems via magnetorheological dampers. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2003; 14: 161–172.
13.
WangDHLiaoWH. Semi-active suspension systems for railway vehicles using magnetorheological dampers, part I: system integration and modeling. Veh Syst Dyn2009; 47: 1305–1325.
14.
WangDHLiaoWH. Semi-active suspension systems for railway vehicles using magnetorheological dampers, part II: simulation and analysis. Veh Syst Dyn2009; 47: 1439–1471.
15.
Atray VS and Roschke PN. Design, fabrication, testing, and fuzzy modeling of a large magnetorheological damper for vibration control in a railcar. In: DP Burleson and DL Cackovic (eds) The IEEE/ASME joint rail conference, Chicago, Illinois, 22--24 April 2003, pp. 223–229. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
16.
AtrayVSRoschkePN. Neuro-fuzzy control of vertical vibrations in a railcar using magnetorheological dampers. Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng2004; 19: 81–92.
17.
Pugi L, Bartolini, F, Rinchi M and Meli E. Design of a lateral and vertical semi-active suspension system for a high speed train. In: J Fraczek (ed.) The multibody dynamic eccomas thematic conference, Warsaw, Poland, 29 June--2 July 2009.
18.
Pugi L, Rindi A, Bartolini F and Auciello J. Simulation of a semi-active suspension system for a high speed train. In: M Berg and AS Trigell (eds) The 21st IAVSD symposium on dynamics of vehicles on roads and tracks, Stockolm, Sweden, 17–21 August 2009.
19.
Allotta B, Pugi L, Bartolini F, et al. Comparison of different control approaches aiming at enhancing the comfort of a railway vehicle. In: B Yao (ed.) The IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics, Montréal, Canada, 6--9 July 2010, pp. 676–681. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
20.
Gao GS and Yang SP. Semi-active control performance of railway vehicle suspension featuring magnetorheological dampers. In: FH Luo (ed.) The first IEEE conference on industrial electronics and applications, Singapore, 24--26 May 2006, pp. 1–5. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
21.
Hudha K, Harun MH, Harun MH and Jamaluddin H. Lateral suspension control of railway vehicle using semi-active magnetorheological damper. In: C Stiller (ed.) The IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium, Baden-Baden, Germany, 5–9 June 2011, pp. 728–733. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
22.
Poynor JC. Innovative design for magneto-rheological dampers. MS Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA, 2001.
23.
ChoiSBNamMHLeeBK. Vibration control of a MR seat damper for commercial vehicles. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2000; 11: 936–944.
24.
LiWHYaoGZChenG. Testing and steady state modeling of a linear MR damper under sinusoidal loading. Smart Mater Struct2000; 9: 95–102.
25.
ZhouGYZhangPQ. Investigation of the dynamic mechanical behavior of the double-barreled configuration in a magnetorheological fluid damper. Smart Mater Struct2002; 11: 230–238.
26.
SassiSCherifKMezghaniL. An innovative magnetorheological damper for automotive suspension: from design to experimental characterization. Smart Mater Struct2005; 14: 811–822.
27.
WangXGordaninejadFHitchcockG. A new modular magnetorheological fluid valve for large-scale seismic applications. Proc SPIE2004; 5386: 226–237.
28.
LiWHDuHGuoNQ. Finite element analysis and simulation evaluation of a magnetorheological valve. Int J Adv Mfg Technol2003; 21: 438–445.
29.
AydarGWangXGordaninejadF. A novel two-way-controllable magneto-rheological fluid damper. Smart Mater Struct2010; 19: 065024–065024.
30.
LiWHZhangXZDuH. Development and simulation evaluation of a magnetorheological elastomer isolator for seat vibration control. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2012; 23: 1041–1048.
31.
GorodkinSJamesRKordonskiW. Irreversible effects in magnetorheological fluids. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2011; 22: 1749–1754.
32.
KooJHGoncalvesFDAhmadianM. A comprehensive analysis of the response time of MR dampers. Smart Mater Struct2006; 15: 351–358.
33.
GuanXCOuJP. Response time experiment and analysis of magnetorheological fluid actuator. Earthq Engng Engng Vib2002; 22: 96–102 (in Chinese).
34.
XuZDShenYPGuoYQ. Semi-active control of structures incorporated with magnetorheological dampers using neural networks. Smart Mater Struct2003; 12: 80–87.
