Comparison of the fatigue and impact fracture behaviour of five different steel grades used in the frog of a turnout

Abstract

The material requirements for the frog of a turnout are quite complex. The crossing nose region of the frog represents a discontinuity in the track as the wheel needs to change from one rail to the other. This causes increased dynamic contact forces and slip between wheel and frog. The high contact pressures and slip can cause damage such as wear, rolling contact fatigue and severe plastic deformation in the frog. The material from which the frog is constructed plays a crucial role in the development of damage. On the one hand, a plastic material response can reduce the contact pressures by an adaption of the frog’s geometry. On the other hand, materials have a different resistance to wear, crack initiation and growth. To clarify the requirements for materials for the manufacture of frogs, five different steel grades used to create frogs that are in service in various railway turnouts were investigated. The chosen materials were ‘Hadfield steel’ (an Mn-13, abrasion-resistant grain-refined steel with 400 HV), bainitic railway steel, tempered steel 51CrV4 (DIN 1.8159) and maraging steel. They were investigated in the same conditions as they would experience in service, covering a variety of steel microstructures and macroscopic hardness values. To compare the materials’ responses to the high impact forces, their impact fracture toughness was measured and selected fracture surfaces were investigated with scanning electron microscopy. To compare their response to the cyclic loading, the materials were tested with respect to their monotonic tensile strength as well as fatigue strength by means of low cycle fatigue tests. Measurements of the fracture toughness K_IC were performed on all materials to compare their fracture resistance. The achieved results can be used as input data for finite-element-based calculations of the local loading conditions in railway turnouts. Additionally, the comparison can help the choice of the best material for specific loading conditions, i.e. specific crossing geometries and track loading conditions.

Keywords

Railway turnout steel grades Hadfield steel bainitic steel quenched-tempered steel low cycle fatigue fracture toughness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kalker

Cannon

Orringer

. Rail quality and maintenance for modern railway operation, Delft, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.

Zerbst

Beretta

. Failure and damage tolerance aspects of railway components. Engng Fail Anal 2011; 18: 534–542.

Wiest

Daves

Fischer

Ossberger

. Deformation and damage of a crossing nose due to wheel passages. Wear 2008; 256: 1431–1438.

Pletz M, Daves W and Ossberger H. A wheel passing a frog nose - dynamic finite element investigation of high axle loads. In: The eighth International Heavy Haul Association conference (ed M Roney), Calgary, Canada, 19–22 June 2011. Virgina, USA: International Heavy Haul Association.

Johansson

Palsson

Ekh

. Simulation of wheel-rail contact and damage in switches & crossings. Wear 2011; 271: 472–481.

Pletz M, Daves W and Ossberger H. A wheel set/crossing model regarding impact, sliding and deformation – explicit finite element approach. Wear 2012; 294–295: 446–456. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043164812002761.

Pletz

Daves

Eck

Ossberger

. The plastic adaption of railway crossings due to dynamic contact loading- explicit FE study. Tribol Int 2013 (submitted).

Suresh

. Fatigue of materials, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Norberg

. Fatigue properties of austenitic Mn-steel in explosion depth hardened condition, Diploma Thesis, Chalmers University, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2010.

10.

Zhang

Wang

. Explosion hardening of Hadfield steel crossing. Mater Sci Technol 2010; 26(2): 223–229.

11.

Zhang

Zheng

. Microstructure of the worn surfaces of a bainitic steel railway crossing. Wear 2010; 268: 1243–1249.

12.

Hlavaty

Sigmund

Krejci

Mohyla

. The bainitic steels for rails applications. Mater Engng 2009; 16(4): 44–50.

13.

Adler

Olson

Owen

. Strain hardening of Hadfield manganese steel. Metall Mater Trans A 1986; 17(10): 1725–1737.

14.

Zhang

Wang

. Microstructure and properties of purity high Mn steel crossing explosion hardened. ISIJ Int 2008; 48(12): 1766–1770.

15.

Dobenek

Prikhodovsky

Ploshikhin

. Electron beam welding of switch points for railway tracks. Materialwiss Werkstofftech 2007; 38(7): 544–551.

16.

Wetscher

Vorhauer

Pippan

. Strain hardening during high pressure torsion deformation. Mater Sci Engng A 2005; 410-411: 213–216.

17.

American Society for Metals. Metals handbook - fractography and atlas of fractographs, Eighth ed. Metals Park, OH: American Society for Metals, 1974.

18.

Bayraktar

Khalid

Levaillant

. Deformation and fracture behavior of high manganese austenitic steel. J Mater Process Technol 2004; 147: 145–154.

19.

Rehrl

Kleber

Renk

Pippan

. Effect of grain size in compression deformation on the microstructural evolution of an austenitic stainless steel. Mater Sci Engng A 2012; 540: 55–62.