An integrated capacity evaluation method for CBTC- system-equipped urban rail lines

Abstract

Communications-based train control (CBTC) is an emerging technology for urban rail transit systems. An integrated method for assessing the capacity of CBTC-system-installed urban rail lines is proposed in this paper. Based on the UIC Code 406 method, the new integrated method includes train movement simulation, timetable construction, test and optimisation. In order to achieve an accurate blocking time, this paper introduces three operational scenarios, namely: consecutive running of trains, entering a station and turn-back at a terminal station. A practical timetable is implemented and optimised by simulating and evaluating the capacity with UIC Code 406. This paper considers Beijing’s Yizhuang metro line in a case study. It is found that a speed limit on the line produces a greater impact on the capacity compared with dwell time and switch speed restrictions. Furthermore, it is noted that a capacity bottleneck can easily occur during the process of entering a station and also during a turn-back operation at a terminal station.

Keywords

Capacity communications-based train control urban rail line blocking time UIC Code 406 simulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Morar S. Evolution of communication based train control worldwide. In: The IET professional development course on railway signalling and control systems, London, UK, 21–24 May 2012, pp.218–226. Stevenage, UK: Institution of Engineering and Technology.

Pascoe

Eichorn

. What is communication-based train control? IEEE Veh Technol Mag 2009; 4: 16–21.

Rubin

Moore II,

Lee

. Ten myths about US urban rail systems. Transport Policy 1999; 6: 57–73.

Ballis

Liberis

Moschovou

. Investigating the capacity of a metro line by means of a simulation model. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit 2004; 218: 67–78.

Burdett

Kozan

. Techniques for absolute capacity determination in railways. Transport Res, Part B: Methodol 2006; 40: 616–632.

De Kort

Heidergott

Ayhan

. A probabilistic (max, +) approach for determining railway infrastructure capacity. Eur J Oper Res 2003; 148: 644–661.

Kozan

Burdett

. A railway capacity determination model and rail access charging methodologies. Transport Plan Technol 2005; 28: 27–45.

Yuan

Hansen

. Optimizing capacity utilization of stations by estimating knock-on train delays. Transport Res, Part B:Methodol 2007; 41: 202–217.

Abril

Barber

Ingolotti

. An assessment of railway capacity. Transport Res, Part E: Logistics Transport Rev 2008; 44: 774–806.

10.

International Union of Railways. UIC Leaflet 406, capacity, Paris, France: International Union of Railways, 2004.

11.

Landex

. Evaluation of railway networks with single track operation using the UIC 406 capacity method. Networks Spatial Econ 2009; 9: 7–23.

12.

Landex A, Kaas AH, Schittenhelm B and Schneider-Tilli J. Practical use of the UIC 406 capacity leaflet by including timetable tools in the investigations. In: Allan J, Brebbia CA, Rumsey AF, et al. (eds) Computers in railways X: computer system design and operation in the railway and other transit systems, 2006, pp.643–652. Southampton, UK: WIT Press.

13.

Landex A, Schittenhelm B, Kaas AH and Schneider-Tilli J. Capacity measurement with the UIC 406 capacity method. In: Allan J, Arias E, Brebbia CA, et al. (eds) Computers in railways XI: computer system design and operation in the railway and other transit systems, 2008, pp.55–64. Southampton, UK: WIT Press.

14.

Lindner

. Applicability of the analytical UIC code 406 compression method for evaluating line and station capacity. J Rail Transport Plan Mngmnt 2011; 1: 49–57.

15.

OpenTrack Railway Technology Ltd. Railway simulation. http://www.opentrack.ch/opentrack/opentrack_e/opentrack_e.html#Simulation (2012, accessed 25 December 2012).

16.

Rail Management Consultants GmbH. RailSys Enterprise-Planning platform. http://www.rmcon.de/en/products/railsys-product-family/railsys-enterprise.html (2012, accessed 25 December 2012).

17.

Dingier

Lai

Y-C

Barkan

CPL

. Effects of communications-based train control and electronically controlled pneumatic brakes on railroad capacity. Transport Res Record 2010; 2159: 77–84.

18.

Akita

Watanabe

Nakamura

Okumura

. Computerized interlocking system for railway signaling control: SMILE. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 1985; 21: 826–834.

19.

IEEE 1698-2009: 2009. IEEE guide for the calculation of braking distances for rail transit vehicles.

20.

IEEE 14741-2004 (Revision of IEEE 14741-1999):2004. IEEE standard for communications-based train control (CBTC) performance and functional requirements.

21.

Ingo

Hansen

. Railway timetable & traffic, Hamburg, Germany: Eurail Press, 2008.

22.

Schwanhäuβer

. The status of German railway operations management in research and practice. Transport Res, Part A: Policy Pract 1994; 28: 495–500.

23.

Wendler

. The scheduled waiting time on railway lines. Transport Res, Part B: Methodol 2007; 41: 148–158.