Railway track degrades more quickly in the transition zones between embankments and bridges, mostly due to the development of settlements in the backfill. This amplifies the dynamic train/track interaction forces and accelerates the deterioration of the components of both the track and the vehicles. Consequently, it induces additional maintenance costs, reduces passenger comfort and, ultimately, it may affect train safety at transition zones. To address this problem and to obtain more insight into the influence of the settlement profiles of the backfill in the train/track system, nonlinear dynamic analyses were performed using a transition zone model to simulate different settlement profiles of the backfill. In some cases, the results showed significant amplifications of axle accelerations and loads. In general, the greater the number of hanging sleepers and their gap sizes, the higher the vertical accelerations of the sleepers and the larger the vertical contact forces between the sleepers and the ballast layer. Settlement profiles associated with backfills with a wedge shape seem to limit these negative aspects.
European Rail Research Institute. Bridge ends - embankment structure transition, state of art. Report D230.1, 1999. Utrecht: The Netherlands: European Rail Research Institute.
2.
López Pita A, Teixeira PF, Casas-Esplugas C and Ubalde L. Deterioration in geometric track quality on high speed lines: the experience of the Madrid-Seville high speed line (1992–2002). In: TRB 85th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers CD-ROM, Washington DC, 22–25 January 2006, p. 14. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board.
KanazawaHTarumiH. Technical transition of earth structures for Shinkansen. Soils Found2010; 50(6): 817–828.
5.
BanimahdMWoodwardPKKennedyJMederoG. Behaviour of train-track interaction in stiffness transitions. Proc Inst Civ Eng Transp2012; 165(3): 205–214.
6.
VarandasJNHolscherPSilvaMAG. Settlement of ballasted track under traffic loading: application to transition zones. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit2014; 228(3): 242–259.
7.
PaixãoAFortunatoECalçadaR. Design and construction of backfills for railway track transition zones. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit2015; 229(1): 58–70.
8.
Nicks JE. The bump at the end of the railway bridge. PhD Thesis, Texas A&M University, USA, 2009.
9.
Schooleman R. Overgang kunstwerk-aardebaan voor de hoge-snelheidslijn. MSc Thesis, Technische Universiteit Delft, The Netherlands, 1996.
10.
Alves RibeiroCPaixãoAFortunatoECalçadaR. Under sleeper pads in transition zones at railway underpasses: numerical modelling and experimental validation. Struct Infrastruct Engng2014. DOI:10.1080/15732479.2014.970203.
11.
Costa D'Aguiar S, Arlaud E, Potvin R, et al. Railway transitional zones: the challenges of very high speeds. In: The World congress on railway research, Sydney, Australia, 25–28 November 2013, p.8. Sydney: Informa.
12.
FortunatoEPaixãoACalçadaR. Railway track transition zones: design, construction, monitoring and numerical modelling. Int J Railway Technol2013; 2(4): 33–58.
13.
PaixãoAFortunatoECalçadaR. Transition zones to railway bridges: track measurements and numerical modelling. Engng Struct2014; 80: 435–443.
14.
PaixãoAAlves RibeiroCPintoNMP. On the use of under sleeper pads on transition zones at railway underpasses: experimental field testing. Struct Infrastruct Engng2015; 11(2): 112–128.
15.
EnglandGLTsangNCMBushDI. Integral bridges: A fundamental approach to the time-temperature loading problem, Third ed. Prague, Czech Republic: Thomas Telford, 2000, pp. 494.
16.
Kempfert H-G and Stadel M. Geotechnische konstruktionen am übergang brücke-erdbauwerk. In: Vortrge der Baugrundtagung 2000, Hannover, Germany, 18–21 September 2000, pp. 295–301.
17.
Luomala H and Nurmikolu A. Railway track stiffness measurements at bridge transition zones. In: Advances in transportation geotechnics II (eds S Miura, T Ishikawa, N Yoshida, et al.), Hokkaido, Japan, 10-12 September 2012, pp. 811-816. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
18.
Abu-Farsakh MY and Chen Q. Field demonstration of new bridge approach slab designs and performance. Report, Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 2014.
19.
Alves Ribeiro C. Transiçóes aterro-estrutura em linhas ferroviárias de alta velocidade: análise experimental e numérica. PhD Thesis, University of Porto, Portugal, 2012.
20.
Paixáo A. Transition zones in railway tracks: an experimental and numerical study on the structural behaviour. PhD Thesis, University of Porto, Portugal, 2014.
21.
ANSYS. Release 13 documentation for ANSYS, 2011.
22.
CoelhoBHölscherPPriestJ. An assessment of transition zone performance. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit2011; 225(2): 129–139.
Varandas JN, Paixão A, Fortunato E, et al. Non-linear elastic behaviour of unbound aggregates in FEM representing railway transition zones. In: Railways 2014, the second international conference on railway technology: research, development and maintenance, (ed. J Pombo), Ajaccio, Corsica, France, 8–11 April 2014, Paper 228. Stirlingshire, UK: Civil-Comp Press.
25.
Paixão A and Fortunato E. Rail track structural analysis using three-dimensional numerical models. In: The 7th European conference on numerical methods in geotechnical engineering. (eds T Benz and S Nordal), Trondheim, Norway, 2–4 June 2010, pp.575–580. London: CRC Press.
26.
Varandas JN. Long-term behaviour of railway transitions under dynamic loading. PhD Thesis, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal, 2013.
27.
RibeiroDCalçadaRDelgadoR. Finite-element model calibration of a railway vehicle based on experimental modal parameters. Veh Syst Dyn2013; 51(6): 821–856.
28.
MijarARAroraJS. Review of formulations for elastostatic frictional contact problems. Struct Multidiscip Optim2000; 20(3): 167–189.
29.
ZhuJYThompsonDJJonesCJC. On the effect of unsupported sleepers on the dynamic behaviour of a railway track. Veh Syst Dyn2011; 49(9): 1389–1408.
30.
ZhangSXiaoXWenZJinX. Effect of unsupported sleepers on wheel/rail normal load. Soil Dyn Earthq Engng2008; 28(8): 662–673.
31.
ShiJChanAHBurrowMPN. Influence of unsupported sleepers on the dynamic response of a heavy haul railway embankment. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit2013; 227(6): 657–667.
32.
LundqvistADahlbergT. Load impact on railway track due to unsupported sleepers. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit2005; 219(2): 67–77.
33.
EN1990: 2005. Eurocode: basis of structural design. Annex A2: Application for bridges.
34.
Administrador de Infraestructuras Ferroviarias. Pliego de condiciones tecnicas para el premantenimiento de infraestructura, vía y desvios de alta velocidad del tramo Albacete-Alicante. Madrid: Administrador de Infraestructuras Ferroviarias, 2012.
35.
XiaHHanYZhangNGuoW. Dynamic analysis of train–bridge system subjected to non-uniform seismic excitations. Earthq Engng Struct Dyn2006; 35(12): 1563–1579.
