Drive-by detection of railway track stiffness variation using in-service vehicles

Abstract

Railway track stiffness is an important track property which can help with the identification of maintenance related problems. Railway track stiffness can currently be measured using stationary equipment or specialised low-speed vehicles. The concept of using trains in regular service to measure track stiffness has the potential to provide inexpensive daily ‘drive-by’ track monitoring to complement data collected by less-frequent monitoring techniques. A method is proposed in this paper for the detection of track stiffness variation through an analysis of vehicle accelerations resulting from the vehicle–track dynamic interaction. The cross-entropy optimisation technique is applied to determine the track stiffness profile, which generates a vehicle response that best fits the measured vertical accelerations of a railway carriage bogie.

Numerical validation of the concept is achieved by using a two-dimensional half-bogie dynamic model, representing a railway vehicle, to infer a global track stiffness profile along a track. The track stiffness measurement algorithm is implemented in Matlab. This paper reports the results of the numerical simulations. The proposed method gives good estimates of the track stiffness. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first time an optimisation technique has been applied to the determination of railway track stiffness.

Keywords

Railway track stiffness drive-by vehicle track interaction cross entropy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Weston

Roberts

Yeo

. Perspectives on railway track geometry condition monitoring from in-service railway vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn Int J Veh Mech Mobil 2015; 53: 1063–1091.

Oscarsson

Dahlberg

. Dynamic train/track/ballast interaction - computer models and full-scale experiments. Veh Syst Dyn Int J Veh Mech Mobil 1998; 29: 73–84.

Dahlberg

Track issues. In: Iwnicki

(ed). Handbook of railway vehicle dynamics, Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis, 2006, pp. 143–197.

Dahlberg

. Railway track stiffness variations–consequences and countermeasures. Int J Civ Eng 2010; 8: 1–12.

Selig

Waters

. Track geotechnology and substructure management, London: Thomas Telford, 1994.

Selig

. Track modulus: its meaning and factors influencing it. Transp Res Rec 1470 1994, pp. 47–54.

Hosseingholian M, Foumentin M and Robinet A. Dynamic track modulus from measurement of track acceleration by portancemetre. In: 9th world congress on railway research, France, 2011.

Frýba

. Vibration of solids and structures under moving loads, 3rd ed. Prague: Thomas Telford, 1999.

Frohling RD. Deterioration of railway track due to dynamic vehicle loading and spatially varying track stiffness. PhD Thesis, University of Pretoria, South Africa, 1997.

10.

Hosseingholian

Froumentin

Levacher

. Continuous method to measure track stiffness a new tool for inspection of rail infrastructure. World Appl Sci J 2009; 6: 579–589.

11.

IS EN 13848: Railway Applications - Track - Track Geometry Quality - CEN European Committee for Standardisation.

12.

Kolbe T and Kratochwille R. ICE-S - Vehicle reaction measurement and track geometry measurement on the same measuring train. Results of the comparison of the two different track inspection methods. In: IMechE Stephenson conference for railways, London. Paper: C1408/068, 2015.

13.

Murray

Take

Hoult

. Measurement of vertical and longitudinal rail displacements using digital image correlation. Can Geotech J 2015; 52: 141–155.

14.

Berggren EG. Railway track stiffness – dynamic measurements and evaluation for efficient maintenance. PhD Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden, 2009.

15.

Berggren

Nissen

Paulsson

. Track deflection and stiffness measurements from a track recording car. J Rail Rapid Transit 2014; 228: 570–580.

16.

Le Pen L, Watson G, Powrie W, et al. The behaviour of railway level crossings: Insights through field monitoring. Transp Geotech, https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.trgeo.2014.05.002 (2014).

17.

Harris

González

OBrien

. Characterisation of pavement profile heights using accelerometer readings and a combinatorial optimisation technique. J Sound Vib 2010; 329: 497–508.

18.

OBrien

Keenahan

. Drive-by damage detection in bridges using the apparent profile. Struct Control Heal Monit 2014; 22: 813–825.

19.

Iwnicki

. Handbook of railway vehicle dynamics, Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis, 2006.

20.

Bowe C. Dynamic interaction of trains and railway bridges using wheel rail contact method. PhD Thesis, National University of Ireland, Ireland, 2009.

21.

Connolly

Giannopoulos

Forde

. Numerical modelling of ground borne vibrations from high speed rail lines on embankments. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2013; 46: 13–19.

22.

Esveld

. Modern railway track, 2nd ed. Delft: MRT-Productions, 2001.

23.

Frýba

. Dynamics of railway bridges, London: Thomas Telford, 1996.

24.

Kouroussis

Verlinden

. Prediction of railway ground vibrations: Accuracy of a coupled lumped mass model for representing the track/soil interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2015; 69: 220–226.

25.

Zhai

Wang

Lin

. Modelling and experiment of railway ballast vibrations. J Sound Vib 2004; 270: 673–683.

26.

Fish

Belytschko

. A first course in finite elements, London: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2007.

27.

Liu

Quek

. The finite element method: A practical course, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2003.

28.

Bathe

Wilson

. Numerical methods in finite element analysis, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1976.

29.

Tedesco

McDougal

Ross

. Structural dynamics, theory and applications, Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley Longman, 1999.

30.

Weaver

Johnston

. Structural dynamics by finite elements, Indiana: Prentice Hall, 1987.

31.

Zimmermann

. Die berechnung des eisenbahnoberbaues (The analysis of railway tracks) (in German), Berlin: Verlag, W. Ernst & Son, 1887.

32.

de Boer

Kroese

Mannor

. A tutorial on the cross-entropy method. Ann Oper Res 2005; 134: 19–67.

33.

Wilson

Harris

OBrien

. The use of Bayesian statistics to predict patterns of spatial repeatability. J Transp Res Part C - Emerg Technol 2006; 14: 303–315.

34.

Berggren EG, Jahlénius Å, Bengtsson B-E, et al. Simulation, development and field testing of a track stiffness measurement vehicle. In: Proceedings of 8th international heavy haul conference, Rio de Janeiro, 2005, pp.763–772.

35.

Absi

Mahadevan

. Multi-fidelity approach to dynamics model calibration. Mech Syst Signal Process 2016; 68-69: 189–206.