Wear processes from mechanical braking, rail/wheel contact, the railway electrification system and re-suspended materials due to the turbulence of passing trains in tunnels and stations have been suggested to be the main contributors to particulate matter levels inside trains. In this study, onboard monitoring was performed on a commuter train stopping at underground and aboveground stations. The concentration and size distribution of particulates were monitored for both indoor and outdoor levels. The results show that the levels of PM10 and PM2.5 inside the train were about one-fifth of the outdoor levels. Significant increases in indoor particulate number concentrations were observed in tunnel environments and there was a slight increase when the doors were open. Differences in the size distributions of micro- and nano-sized particulates could be identified for different tunnels.
OlofssonU. A study of airborne wear particles generated from the train traffic—block braking simulation in a pin-on-disc machine. Wear. 271: 86–91. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0043164810003509 (2011, accessed 19 September 2014).
2.
AbbasiSOlanderLLarssonCet al.A field test study of airborne wear particles from a running regional train. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit. 226: 95–109. http://pif.sagepub.com/lookup/doi/10.1177/0954409711408774 (2011, accessed 5 December 2014).
3.
QuerolXMorenoTKaranasiouAet al.Variability of levels and composition of PM10 and PM2.5 in the Barcelona metro system. Atmos Chem Phys. 12: 5055–5076. http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/5055/2012/ (2012, accessed 17 October 2014).
4.
ColombiCAngiusSGianelleVet al.Particulate matter concentrations, physical characteristics and elemental composition in the Milan underground transport system. Atmos Environ. 70: 166–178. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1352231013000605 (2013, accessed 17 October 2014).
5.
KamWCheungKDaherNet al.Particulate matter (PM) concentrations in underground and ground-level rail systems of the Los Angeles Metro. Atmos Environ. 45: 1506–1516. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1352231010010976 (2011, accessed 8 December 2014).
6.
AarnioPYli-TuomiTKousaAet al.The concentrations and composition of and exposure to fine particles (PM2.5) in the Helsinki subway system. Atmos Environ. 39: 5059–5066. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1352231005004486 (2005, accessed 16 October 2014).
KimKYKimYSRohYMet al.Spatial distribution of particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) in Seoul Metropolitan Subway stations. J Hazard Mater2008; 154: 440–443.
9.
European commision. Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on Ambient Air Quality and Cleaner Air for Europe, OJ 2008 L 152/1.
10.
ParkD-UHaK-C. Characteristics of PM10, PM2.5, CO2 and CO monitored in interiors and platforms of subway train in Seoul, Korea. Environ Int. 34: 629–34. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18262270 (2008, accessed 6 January 2015).
11.
ChengY-HLiuZ-SYanJ-W. Comparisons of PM10, PM2.5, particle number, and CO2 levels inside metro trains between traveling in underground tunnels and on elevated tracks. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 12: 879–891. http://www.aaqr.org/Doi.php?id=16_AAQR-12-05-OA-0127&v=12&i=5&m=10&y=2012 (2012, accessed 6 January 2015).
12.
HindsWC. Aerosol technology: properties, behavior, and measurement of airborne particles, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley Interscience, 1999.
13.
FridellEFermMEkbergA. Emissions of particulate matters from railways – emission factors and condition monitoring. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 15: 240–245. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1361920910000155 (2010, accessed 16 October 2014).
14.
Gustafsson M, Abbasi S, Blomqvist G, et al. Particles in road and railroad tunnel air – sources, properties and abatement measurements VTI report, Linköping, Sweden, 2016.
15.
MaricqMMPodsiadlikDHChaseRE. Size distributions of motor vehicle exhaust PM: a comparison between ELPI and SMPS measurements. Aerosol Sci Technol2000; 33: 239–260.
16.
BraniˇM. The contribution of ambient sources to particulate pollution in spaces and trains of the Prague underground transport system. Atmos Environ2006; 40: 348–356.
17.
LiTTBaiYHLiuZRet al.In-train air quality assessment of the railway transit system in Beijing: a note. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ2007; 12: 64–67.
18.
SeatonACherrieJDennekampMet al.The London underground: dust and hazards to health. Occup Environ Med2005; 62: 355–362.
19.
OnatBStakeevaB. Assessment of fine particulate matters in the subway system of Istanbul. Indoor Built Environ2014; 23: 574–583.
20.
AbbasiSJanssonAOlanderLet al.A pin-on-disc study of the rate of airborne wear particle emissions from railway braking materials. Wear. 284–285: 18–29. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0043164812000257 (2012, accessed 28 August 2014).
KimKHHoDXJeonJSet al.A noticeable shift in particulate matter levels after platform screen door installation in a Korean subway station. Atmos Environ2012; 49: 219–223.
