While magnesium alloys have the attractive attributes of low density, the application of the metal in transportation industries has been restricted by its low stiffness and strength. The aim of this study was to examine the possibility of lightweight railway car body construction using magnesium alloys from the structural and manufacturing perspectives. Extruded members, making up a car body, were designed employing a gradient-based optimization algorithm. And then, numerical simulations were conducted to confirm the structural performance of the newly designed car body. In addition, one of the designed members was extruded and joined with another via friction stir welding in order to verify its fabrication potential. The work demonstrated that, with just 85% of the weight of an aluminium car body currently in operation, a magnesium-based railway car body can be potentially constructed by extrusion followed by friction stir welding for the next generation rolling stocks; that is to say, the weight saving amount is 10% of the total bare frame weight, or 2% of its total rolling stock weight.
RochardBSchmidF. Benefits of lower-mass trains for high speed rail operations. Proc Inst Civil Eng Transp2004; 157: 51–64.
2.
WadleyHNG. Multifunctional periodic cellular metals. Philos Trans R Soc A2006; 364: 31–68.
3.
EvansAGHutchinsonJWFleckNAet al.The topological design of multifunctional cellular metals. Prog Mater Sci2001; 46: 309–327.
4.
CameronCJNordgrenELWennhagePet al.On the balancing of structural and acoustic performance of a sandwich panel based on topology, property, and size optimization. J Sound Vib2014; 333: 2677–2698.
5.
CameronCJWennhagePGöranssonPet al.Structural-acoustic design of a multifunctional sandwich panel in an automotive context. J Sandw Struct Mater2010; 12: 684–708.
6.
SeoSIKimJSChoSH. Development of a hybrid composite bodyshell for tilting trains. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2008; 222: 1–13.
7.
KimJSLeeSJShinKB. Manufacturing and structural safety evaluation of a composite train car body. Compos Struct2007; 78: 468–476.
8.
UNI EN 13981-1:2006. Aluminum and aluminum alloys—products for structural railway applications—technical conditions for inspection and delivery.
9.
Koenig J. Integral consideration of the lightweight design for railway vehicles. In: Young researchers seminar, Technical University of Denmark, 2011.
10.
MoriHUehigashiNMiyauchiTet al.Application of the flame-resisting magnesium alloy to body shell. Q Rep RTRI2014; 55: 223–228.
11.
Quan G, Li R, Gu X, et al. Magnesium alloys—new materials for high speed train with reduced vibration and noise. In: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on high-speed and intercity railways lecture note in electrical engineering, Shenzhen, China, 19–22 July 2011, 2, pp.349–356.
12.
JIS E 7105:1994. Test methods for static load of body structures of railway rolling stock.
13.
KabirianFKhanAS. Anisotropic yield criteria in σ-τ stress space for materials with yield asymmetry. Int J Solids Struct2015; 67–68: 116–126.
14.
KhanASPandeyAGnäupel-HeroldTet al.Mechanical response and texture evolution of AZ31 alloy at large strains for different strain rates and temperatures. Int J Plast2011; 27: 688–706.
15.
CazacuOPlunkettBBarlatF. Orthotropic yield criterion for hexagonal closed packed metals. Int J Plast2006; 22: 1171–1194.
16.
YoonJHCazacuOMishraRK. Constitutive modeling of AZ31 sheet alloy with application to axial crushing. Mater Sci Eng A Struct2013; 565: 203–212.
17.
LeeMGWagonerRHLeeJKet al.Constitutive modeling for anisotropic/asymmetric hardening behavior of magnesium alloy sheets: application to sheet springback. Int J Plast2009; 25: 70–104.
18.
ChamosANPantelakisSGHaidemenopoulosGNet al.Tensile and fatigue behaviour of wrought magnesium alloys AZ31 and AZ61. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct2008; 31: 812–821.
AllenHG. Analysis and design of structural sandwich panels, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1969.
21.
ZenkertD. An introduction to sandwich construction, London: Engineering Materials Advisory Services, 1995.
22.
BiagiRLimJYBart-SmithH. In-plane compression response of extruded Aluminum 6061-T6 corrugated core sandwich columns. J Am Ceram Soc2011; 94: S76–S84.
23.
LimJYBart-SmithH. Theoretical approach on the dynamic global buckling response of metallic corrugated core sandwich columns. Int J Nonlinear Mech2014; 76: 14–31.
24.
St-PierreLDeshpandeVSFleckNA. The low velocity impact response of sandwich beams with a corrugated core or a Y-frame core. Int J Mech Sci2015; 91: 71–80.
25.
YungwirthCJWadleyHNGO'ConnorJHet al.Impact response of sandwich plates with a pyramidal lattice core. Int J Impact Eng2008; 35: 920–936.
26.
CôtéFDeshpandeVSFleckNAet al.The compressive and shear responses of corrugated and diamond lattice materials. Int J Solids Struct2006; 43: 6220–6242.
27.
LimJYBart-SmithH. An analytical model for the face wrinkling failure prediction of metallic corrugated core sandwich columns in dynamic compression. Int J Mech Sci2015; 92: 290–303.
28.
LimJYBart-SmithH. Dynamic buckling response of long plates for the prediction of local plate buckling of corrugated core sandwich columns. ASME Trans J Appl Mech2015, pp. 82. : 111008-1–111008-12DOI: 10.1115/1.4031279.
29.
Altair Engineering. Altair Hyperstudy 10—user's manual, design of experiments, optimization and stochastic studies. Altair Engineering Inc., 2010.
30.
DS Simulia. ABAQUS/Standard user's manual ver 6.10. Dassault Systems Inc., 2010.
31.
Ma X. Surface quality of aluminium extrusion products, PhD Thesis, University of Twente, 2011.
32.
SheppardT. Extrusion of aluminium alloys, London: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1999.
33.
KS D 6723: 2011. Magnesium alloy extruded shapes (consistent with ISO 3116: 2001. Magnesium and magnesium alloys—wrought magnesium alloys).
34.
NandanRDebRoyTBhadeshiaH. Recent advances in friction-stir welding–process, weldment structure and properties. Prog Mater Sci2008; 53: 980–1023.
35.
WooWChooHBrownDWet al.Texture variation and its influence on the tensile behavior of a friction-stir processed magnesium alloy. Scripta Mater2006; 54: 1859–1864.
36.
ParkSHCSatoYSKokawaH. Effect of micro-texture on fracture location in friction stir weld of Mg alloy AZ61 during tensile test. Scripta Mater2003; 43: 161–166.
37.
FuBQinGLiFet al.Friction stir welding process of dissimilar metals of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy to AZ31B magnesium alloy. J Mater Process Tech2015; 218: 38–47.
38.
MunozACRückertGHuneauBet al.Comparison of TIG welded and friction stir welded Al–4.5 Mg–0.26 Sc alloy. J Mater Process Tech2008; 197: 337–343.
39.
London Metal Exchange. The price of magnesium alloys. Available at: http://www.lme.com (accessed 15 December 2015).
