The dynamic interaction effects of railway tunnels: Crossrail and the Grand Central Recording Studios

Abstract

In cities around the world, underground railways offer an environmentally friendly solution to society’s increasing demand for mass transport. However, they are often constructed close to sensitive buildings, where the resulting ground-borne noise and vibration can cause disturbance to both the occupants and the equipment. Such a scenario occurred in central London, where the new twin tunnels of Crossrail were bored beneath the Grand Central Recording Studios, causing an immediate concern. As a result, vibration in the studios’ building was monitored throughout the Crossrail construction period. Since Crossrail is yet to operate, the resulting data provide a unique opportunity to investigate the effect of new tunnels, acting as passive buried structures, on the existing vibration environment. This paper presents the results of such an investigation, together with complementary results from a theoretical four-tunnel boundary-element model. The data analysis, presented in the first half of the paper, indicates that the construction of the second Crossrail tunnel has led to an overall reduction in the noise and vibration levels beneath the studios, due to the operation of the nearby Central line trains of London Underground. This is predominantly due to a reduction of approximately 6 dB in the 63 Hz band-limited levels but accompanied by a slight increase, of approximately 2 dB, in the 125 Hz band. Further analysis indicates that any seasonal variations in vibration levels over the measurement period are negligible, adding weight to the conclusion that the observed changes are a causal effect of the tunnel. The second half of the paper presents results from the model, which aims to simulate the dynamic interaction between the Central line tunnels and those of Crossrail. With nominal parameter values, the results demonstrate qualitative similarities with the measurement findings, thereby adding to the growing body of evidence that dynamic interaction between neighbouring tunnels can be significant.

Keywords

Railway vibration field measurement Crossrail twin tunnels soil–structure interaction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Howarth

Griffin

. The annoyance caused by simultaneous noise and vibration from railways. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 2317–2323.

Heckl

Hauck

Wettschureck

. Structure-borne sound and vibration from rail traffic. J Sound Vib 1996; 193: 175–184.

Vadillo

Herreros

Walker

. Subjective reaction to structurally radiated sound from underground railways: field results. J Sound Vib 1996; 193: 65–74.

Sheng

Jones

CJC

Thompson

. Modelling ground vibration from railways using wavenumber finite- and boundary-element methods. Proc R Soc A 2005; 461: 2043–2070.

Degrande

Clouteau

Othman

et al.

A numerical model for ground-borne vibrations from underground railway traffic based on a periodic finite element-boundary element formulation. J Sound Vib 2006; 293: 645–666.

Forrest

Hunt

HEM

. Ground vibration generated by trains in underground tunnels. J Sound Vib 2006; 294: 706–736.

Hussein

MFM

Hunt

HEM

. A numerical model for calculating vibration from a railway tunnel embedded in a full-space. J Sound Vib 2007; 305: 401–431.

Hussein

MFM

François

Schevenels

et al.

The use of fictitious force method for efficient calculation of vibration from a tunnel embedded in a multi-layered half-space. J Sound Vib 2014; 333: 6996–7018.

Kuo

Hunt

HEHM

Hussein

MFM

. The effect of a twin tunnel on the propagation of ground-borne vibration from an underground railway. J Sound Vib 2011; 330: 6203–6222.

10.

Jones

Kuo

Hussein

MFM

et al.

Prediction uncertainties and inaccuracies resulting from common assumptions in modelling vibration from underground railways. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2012; 226: 501–512.

11.

Lopes

Costa

Calçada

et al.

Influence of soil stiffness on building vibrations due to railway traffic in tunnels: numerical study. Comput Geotech 2014; 61: 277–291.

12.

Coulier

Lombaert

Degrande

. The influence of source-receiver interaction on the numerical prediction of railway induced vibrations. J Sound Vib 2014; 333: 2520–2538.

13.

Crossrail, http://www.crossrail.co.uk (2016, accessed April 2016).

14.

Detailed London Transport map, http://carto.metro.free.fr/cartes/metro-tram-london (2015, accessed April 2016).

15.

Degrande

Schevenels

Chatterjee

et al.

Vibrations due to a test train at variable speeds in a deep bored tunnel embedded in London clay. J Sound Vib 2006; 293: 626–644.

16.

Domínguez

. Boundary elements in dynamics, Southampton: Computational Mechanics Publications and Elsevier Applied Science, 1993.

17.

Schevenels

François

Degrande

. EDT: an elastodynamics toolbox for matlab. Comput Geosci 2009; 35: 1752–1754.

18.

François

Schevenels

Lombaert

et al.

A 2.5D coupled FE-BE methodology for the dynamic interaction between longitudinally invariant structures and a layered halfspace. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2010; 199: 1536–1548.

19.

Forrest

Hunt

HEM

. A three-dimensional tunnel model for calculation of train-induced ground vibration. J Sound Vib 2006; 294: 678–705.

20.

Frederich

. Die gleislage-aus fathrzeugtechnischer sicht [Effect of track geometry on vehicle performance]. Zitschrift für Eisenbahnwesen und Vekehrstechnik-Glasers Annalen 1984; 108: 355–362.

21.

Newland

. An introduction to random vibrations, spectral and wavelet analysis, London: Longman, 1993.