Prediction of rail and bridge noise arising from concrete railway viaducts by using a multilayer rail fastener model and a wavenumber domain method

Abstract

Concrete viaducts are an important part of urban rail transit systems but they produce considerable noise, thereby affecting the communities living nearby. The vibration generated at the wheel–rail interface is transmitted along the rail and also onto the bridge; hence, noise is radiated from both the rail and the bridge. To facilitate noise prediction, it is desirable to develop a model that takes into account the generation and transmission of vibration in the train–track–bridge system. The vibration and the associated noise of the track–bridge system are computed with a unified vibroacoustic model using a wavenumber domain finite element and boundary element method. An important aspect to note is the frequency-dependent stiffness of a typical rail fastener utilized on bridges due to the resonance of the baseplate between the two rubber pads. In this study, to allow for this effect, a multilayer fastener model is proposed. The proposed procedure is applied to a viaduct with a U-shaped section and compared with field measurements during the passage of trains. The elastic modulus and damping of the rubber pads and the equivalent loss factor of the rail are chosen by fitting the calculated track decay rates to those estimated from the measured rail accelerations under train passages. The wheel–rail combined roughness is also derived from the measured rail vibration. A comparison is then made between the simulated and measured bridge vibration to verify the proposed method as well as the parameters used in the track–bridge system. The predicted noise levels are also compared with the measured results. The effects of the fastener model, fastener stiffness, bridge damping, and interference between multiple wheels are then discussed. It has been found that the bridge noise has a non-negligible effect on the total A-weighted noise levels in the region beneath the bridge and up to 30 m away from the track.

Keywords

Concrete viaducts noise and vibration rail fastener wheel–rail interaction wavenumber domain method

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Stuber

. Air-borne and structure-borne noise of railways. J Sound Vib 1975; 43: 281–289.

Kurzweil

. Prediction and control of noise from railway bridges and tracked transit elevated structures. J Sound Vib 1977; 51: 419–439.

Remington

Wittig

. Measurement and analysis of the noise from and vibration in rapid transit elevated structures. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: S62–S62.

Ungar EE and Wittig LE. Wayside noise of elevated rail transit structures: analysis of published data and supplementary measurements. US Department of Transportation, Report No UMTA-MA-06-0099-80-6, December 1980.

Yang

Chen

et al.

Review of recent progress in studies on noise emanating from rail transit bridges. J Mod Transp 2016, pp. 1–14.

Janssens

MHA

Thompson

. A calculation model for the noise from steel railway bridges. J Sound Vib 1996; 193: 295–305.

Bewes OG. The calculation of noise from railway bridges and viaducts. Doctoral Thesis, University of Southampton, UK, 2005.

Herron D. Vibration of railway bridges in the audible frequency range. Doctoral Thesis, University of Southampton, UK, 2009.

Hardy

. Noise from railway bridges. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 1999; 213: 161–172.

10.

Harrison

Thompson

Jones

CJC

. The calculation of noise from railway viaducts and bridges. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2000; 214: 125–134.

11.

Bewes

Thompson

Jones

CJC

et al.

Calculation of noise from railway bridges and viaducts: Experimental validation of a rapid calculation model. J Sound Vib 2006; 293: 933–943.

12.

Liu

Pei

et al.

Structure-borne noise of railway composite bridge: Numerical simulation and experimental validation. J Sound Vib 2015; 353: 378–394.

13.

Zhang

et al.

A hybrid model for the prediction of low–frequency noise emanating from a concrete box-girder railway bridge. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2016; 230: 1242–1256.

14.

Walker

Ferguson

Smith

. An investigation of noise from trains on bridges. J Sound Vib 1996; 193: 307–314.

15.

Crockett

Pyke

. Viaduct design for minimization of direct and structure-radiated train noise. J Sound Vib 2000; 231: 883–897.

16.

Zhang

et al.

Train-induced vibration and noise radiation of a prestressed concrete box-girder. Noise Control Eng J 2013; 61: 425–435.

17.

Liu

. Sound emission comparisons between the box-section and U-section concrete viaducts for elevated railway. Noise Control Eng J 2012; 60: 450–457.

18.

. Concrete bridge-borne low-frequency noise simulation based on train–track–bridge dynamic interaction. J Sound Vib 2012; 331: 2457–2470.

19.

Song

. A 2.5-dimensional method for the prediction of structure-borne low-frequency noise from concrete rail transit bridges. J Acoust Soc Am 2014; 135: 2718–2726.

20.

Song

et al.

Structure-borne low-frequency noise from multi-span bridges: A prediction method and spatial distribution. J Sound Vib 2016; 367: 114–128.

21.

Song

. Investigation of rail noise and bridge noise using a combined 3D dynamic model and 2.5 D acoustic model. Appl Acoust 2016; 109: 5–17.

22.

et al.

A combined power flow and infinite element approach to the simulation of medium-frequency noise radiated from bridges and rails. J Sound Vib 2016; 365: 134–156.

23.

Fenander

. Frequency dependent stiffness and damping of railpads. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 1997; 211: 51–62.

24.

Wei

Wang

Yang

et al.

The effect of the frequency-dependent stiffness of rail pad on the environment vibrations induced by subway train running in tunnel. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2016; 230: 697–708.

25.

Pinnington

. Vibrational power transmission from a finite source beam to an infinite receiver beam via a continuous complaint mount. J Sound Vib 1990; 137: 117–129.

26.

Thompson

. Vibration analysis of railway track with multiple wheels on the rail. J Sound Vib 2001; 239: 69–97.

27.

Thompson

. The effects on railway rolling noise of wave reflections in the rail and support stiffening due to the presence of multiple wheels. Appl Acoust 2001; 62: 1249–1266.

28.

Nilsson

Jones

CJC

Thompson

et al.

A waveguide finite element and boundary element approach to calculating the sound radiated by railway and tram rails. J Sound Vib 2009; 321: 813–836.

29.

Thompson

. Railway noise and vibration: Mechanisms, modelling and means of control, New York: Elsevier, 2009.

30.

Ntotsios E, Thompson DJ and Hussein M. Effect of rail unevenness correlation on the prediction of ground-borne vibration from railways. In: The 10th European congress and exposition on noise control engineering (Euronoise 2015), Maastricht, Netherlands, 2015.

31.

Nilsson CM and Jones CJC. Theory manual for WANDS 2.1 wave number domain FE-BE software for structures and fluids. 2007.

32.

Remington

. Wheel/rail noise—Part IV: Rolling noise. J Sound Vib 1976; 46: 419–436.

33.

Janssens

MHA

Dittrich

De Beer

et al.

Railway noise measurement method for pass-by noise, total effective roughness, transfer functions and track spatial decay. J Sound Vib 2006; 293: 1007–1028.

34.

Jones

CJC

Thompson

Diehl

. The use of decay rates to analyse the performance of railway track in rolling noise generation. J Sound Vib 2006; 293: 485–495.

35.

EN 15461: 2008. Railway applications – noise emissions, characterization of the dynamic properties of track sections for pass by noise measurements, Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2008.

36.

Dittrich

Létourneaux

Dupuis

. Background for a new standard on pass-by measurement of combined roughness, track decay rate and vibroacoustic transfer functions. In: Noise and vibration mitigation for rail transportation systems, Berlin: Springer, 2015, pp. 197–204.

37.

Thompson

Verheij

. The dynamic behaviour of rail fasteners at high frequencies. Appl Acoust 1997; 52: 1–17.