Numerical study on the slipstream and trackside pressure induced by trains with different longitudinal section lines

Abstract

Slipstreams are generated when high-speed trains pass through the open air causing safety threat to passengers, trackside workers and infrastructure. This study calculates the slipstream induced by trains with different longitudinal section lines using a detached-eddy simulation. The slipstream velocities and pressure at various lateral distances from the centre of the rail position and various vertical distances from the top of the rail position are calculated at a Reynolds number of 1.8 × 10⁶, and the flow field around the trains is analysed. The results of the calculation are compared with the results of a full-scale test to validate the numerical method adopted in this work. The results demonstrate that the variations in the slipstream velocities induced by the four types of trains are similar as are the variations in the trackside pressures. The amplitudes of the slipstream velocities and trackside pressures are different due to the influence of the longitudinal section line, and both the slipstream velocity and the trackside pressure increase with the slope of the longitudinal section line. The slipstream velocity and trackside pressure decrease with increasing distance from the centre of the rail and the top of the rail. The large difference in the slipstream induced by the four types of trains occurs in regions where the distance from the centre of the rail is greater than 2.5 m and the distance from the top of the rail is greater than 1.5 m, and those regions are also the areas where platform passengers and track infrastructure are located. The results demonstrate that the slipstream in those regions can be reduced by adopting relatively lower slopes of the longitudinal section line.

Keywords

High-speed train longitudinal section line slipstream velocity trackside pressure detached-eddy simulation method

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Weise M, Schober M and Orellano A. Slipstream velocities induced by trains. In: Proceedings of the 4th WSEAS international conference on fluid mechanics and aerodynamics (eds Catrakis HJ, Sohrab SH and Necasova S) Elounda, Greece, 21–23 August 2006, pp.26–28. Hellenic (Greek): WSEAS.

Pope C. Safety of slipstreams effects produced by trains. A Report Prepared by Mott Macdonald Ltd. 2006. London: RSSB.

BS EN 14067-4. Railway applications-aerodynamics Part 4: requirements and test procedures for aerodynamics on open track. 2013.

Baker

Quinn

Sima

et al.

Full-scale measurement and analysis of train slipstreams and wakes. Part 1: Ensemble averages. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit 2014; 228: 451–467.

Baker

Quinn

Sima

et al.

Full-scale measurement and analysis of train slipstreams and wakes. Part 2: Gust analysis. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit 2014; 228: 468–480.

Bell

Burton

Thompson

et al.

Wind tunnel analysis of the slipstream and wake of a high-speed train. J Wind Engng Ind Aerodyn 2014; 134: 122–138.

Bell

Burton

Thompson

et al.

The effect of tail geometry on the slipstream and unsteady wake structure of high-speed trains. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2017; 83: 215–230.

Bell

Burton

Thompson

et al.

Moving model analysis of the slipstream and wake of a high-speed train. J Wind Engng Ind Aerodyn 2015; 136: 127–137.

Hemida

Gil

Baker

. LES of the slipstream of a rotating train. J Fluid Eng 2010; 132: 051103.

10.

Gil

Baker

Robert

et al.

Passenger train slipstream characterization using a rotating rail rig. J Fluid Eng 2010; 132: 061401.

11.

Hemida

Baker

Gao

. The calculation of train slipstreams using large-eddy simulation. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit 2014; 228: 25–36.

12.

Hemida

Krajnović

. LES study of the influence of the nose shape and yaw angles on flow structures around trains. J Wind Engng Ind Aerodyn 2010; 98: 34–46.

13.

Flynn

Hemida

Soper

et al.

Detached-eddy simulation of the slipstream of an operational freight train. J Wind Engng Ind Aerodyn 2014; 132: 1–12.

14.

Flynn

Hemida

Baker

. On the effect of crosswinds on the slipstream of a freight train and associated effects. J Wind Engng Ind Aerodyn 2016; 156: 14–28.

15.

Huang

Hemida

Yang

. Numerical calculation of the slipstream generated by a CRH2 high-speed train. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit 2016; 230: 103–116.

16.

Peng

et al.

Multi-objective optimization of a high-speed train head based on the FFD method. J Wind Engng Ind Aerodyn 2016; 152: 41–49.

17.

Baker

. The flow around high speed trains. J Wind Engng Ind Aerodyn 2010; 98: 277–298.

18.

Muld

Efraimsson

Henningson

. Mode decomposition and slipstream velocities in the wake of two high-speed trains. Int J Railway Technol 2013; 2: 1–38.

19.

Spalart

Jou

Strelets

et al.

Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach. Advances in DNS/LES 1997; 1: 4–8.

20.

Spalart PR and Allmaras SR. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Paper 91-0439, 1992, pp.92–0439.

21.

Morden

Hemida

Baker

. Comparison of RANS and detached eddy simulation results to wind-tunnel data for the surface pressures upon a class 43 high-speed train. J Fluid Eng 2015; 137: 041108.