A new methodology for the estimation of wheel–rail contact forces at a high-frequency range

Abstract

Online measurement of wheel–rail contact forces is nowadays in demand for evaluating safety and manoeuvring the condition in real time and in real operation. In this study, the wheel–rail contact forces are estimated using a novel indirect identification method based on the measured radial strain on the wheel web. Further, the strain response of the rolling wheel is derived using an analytical solution of the disk under a rotating load, and a scheme was prepared for the identification of the rolling wheel parameters and its corresponding characteristic matrix. An appropriate angular strain configuration is employed to eliminate the effect of wheel rotation. The Tikhonov regularization technique is employed to solve the ill-posed least square problem and to attenuate the effect of noisy measurement and numerical uncertainty during the estimation of the forces. A finite element model of the rotating load is then constructed to investigate the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed methodology. The effects of the rotating speed, loading and measurement noise on the estimated normal force are studied. It is found that neglecting the effect of the rotating speed causes a notable error particularly in the high-speed range.

Keywords

Contact force estimation structural identification Tikhonov regularization finite element model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Jin

Xiao

Ling

et al.

Study on safety boundary for high-speed train running in severe environments. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2013; 1: 87–108.

Liang

Iwnicki

Ball

et al.

Adaptive noise cancelling and time–frequency techniques for rail surface defect detection. Mech Syst Signal Process 2015; 54: 41–51.

Ouyang

. Moving-load dynamic problems: a tutorial (with a brief overview). Mech Syst Signal Process 2011; 25: 2039–2060.

EN 14363:2005. Railway applications – testing for the acceptance of running characteristic of railway vehicle-testing of running behaviour and stationary test. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.

Grassie

. Rail irregularities, corrugation and acoustic roughness: characteristics, significance and effects of reprofiling. J Rail Rapid Transit 2012; 226: 542–557.

Otter DE, El-Sibaie MA and Higgins RL. A design for next generation load measuring wheel sets. In: IEEE/ASME joint railroad conference, St Louis, MS, USA, 21–23 May 1991, Code 16670.

Ham

Lee

Kwon

et al.

Continuous measurement of interaction forces between wheel and rail. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 2009; 10: 35–39.

Gomez

Gimenez

Alonso

. Method for the reduction of measurement errors associated to the wheel rotation in railway dynamometric wheelsets. Mech Syst Signal Process 2011; 25: 3062–3077.

Riggall

. IWT4 goes into operation. Railw Gazette Int 2008; 164: 455–456.

10.

Nielsen

JCO

. High-frequency vertical wheel-rail contact forces – validation of a prediction model by field testing. Wear 2008; 265: 1465–1471.

11.

Ronasi

Nielsen

JCO

. Inverse identification of wheel–rail contact forces based on observation of wheel disc strains: an evaluation of three numerical algorithms. Veh Syst Dyn 2013; 51: 74–90.

12.

Ronasi

Johansson

Larsson

. A numerical framework for load identification and regularization with application to rolling disc problem. Comput Struct 2011; 89: 38–47.

13.

Ronasi

Johansson

Larsson

. Load identification for a rolling disc: finite element discretization and virtual calibration. Comput Mech 2012; 49: 137–147.

14.

Ronasi

Johansson

Larsson

. Identification of wheel–rail contact forces based on strain measurements, an inverse scheme and a finite-element model of the wheel. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2014; 228: 343–354.

15.

Thompson

. Wheel-rail noise generation, Part V: Inclusion of wheel rotation. J Sound Vib 1993; 161: 467–482.

16.

Levine

. The control handbook, Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis Group, 2011.

17.

Sun

Büyüköztürk

. Identification of traffic-induced nodal excitations of truss bridges through heterogeneous data fusion. Smart Mater Struct 2015; 24: 075032–075032.

18.

Isermann

Unchhof

. Identification of dynamic systems: an introduction with applications, Berlin: Springer, 2011.

19.

Tikhonov

. Solution of incorrectly formulated problems and the regularization method. Soviet Math Doklady 1963; 4: 1035–1038.

20.

Hansen

O’Leary

. The use of the L-curve in the regularization of discrete ill-posed problem. SIAM J Sci Comput 1993; 14: 1487–1503.

21.

Elden

. A note on the computation of the generalized cross-validation function for ill-conditioned least squares problems. BIT 1984; 24: 467–472.

22.

Golub

Heath

Wahba

. Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter. Technometrics 1979; 21: 215–223.

23.

UIC 515-1:2003. International union of railways.

24.

Thompson

. Railway noise and vibration: mechanism, modeling and means of control, Oxford: Elsevier, 2009, pp. 103–104.

25.

Petyt

. Introduction to finite element vibration analysis, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 359–360.

26.

Ferguson NS. The vibration of rolling discs. PhD Thesis, University of Southampton, UK, 1998.

27.

Bagheri

Tehrani

Younesian

. Optimal strain gauge placement in instrumented wheelset for measuring wheel-rail contact forces. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 2017; 18: 1519–1527.