A new approach to railway track switch actuation: Dynamic simulation and control of a self-adjusting switch

Abstract

The track switch is one of the key assets in any railway network. It is essential to allow trains to change route; however, when it fails, significant delays are almost inevitable. A relatively common fault is ‘loss of detection’, which can happen when there is a gradual track movement and the switch machines (actuators) no longer close the gap between the switch rail and stock rail to within safe tolerance levels. Currently, such misalignment is mitigated by a preventative programme of inspection and manual re-adjustment. In contrast to many other industries, the actuators are exclusively operated in open loop, with sensors (often limit switches) mainly being used for detection. Hence, an opportunity exists to investigate the closed loop control concepts for improving the operation of the switch. This paper proposes two advances: first, a novel approach is taken for modelling the dynamic performance of track switch actuators and the moving permanent-way components of the switch. The model is validated against real data from an operational switch. Secondly, the resulting dynamic model is then used to examine the implementation of closed loop feedback control as an integral part of track switch actuation. The proposed controller is found to perform well and offers the potential of ‘self-adjustment’, i.e. re-adjusting itself to close any gap (within a predefined range) between the stock and switch rails, thereby completing the switching operation.

Keywords

Railway track switch self-adjusting switch multibody simulation actuator closed loop control co-simulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bemment

Goodall

Dixon

, et al. Improving the reliability and availability of railway track switching by analysing historical failure data and introducing functionally redundant subsystems. Proc IMechE, Part E: J Process Mechanical Engineering 2017; 232: 1407–1424.

In2Rail. In2Rail, www.in2rail.eu/ (accessed 1 June 2018).

Cope

. British railway track: design, construction and maintenance, UK: Permanent Way Institution, 1993.

Morgan

Design part 2: switches and crossings. In: DL

Cope

Ellis

(eds). British railway track 2009; vol 1 7th ed. Derby, UK: The Permanent Way Institution .

Lagos

Alonso

Vinolas

, et al. Rail vehicle passing through a turnout: analysis of different turnout designs and wheel profiles. Proc IMechE, Part E: J Process Mechanical Engineering 2012; 226: 587–602.

Rama

Andrews

. A reliability analysis of railway switches. Proc IMechE, Part E: J Process Mechanical Engineering 2013; 227: 344–363.

Marquez

FPG

Weston

Roberts

. Failure analysis and diagnostics for railway trackside equipment. Eng Fail Anal 2007; 14: 1411–1426.

Molina LF, Resendiz E, Edwards JR, et al. Condition monitoring of railway turnouts and other track components using machine vision. In: Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting, Washington DC, 2011.

Oyebande

Renfrew

. Condition monitoring of railway electric point machines. IEE Proc – Electric Power Appl 2002; 149: 465–473.

10.

Sarmiento-Carnevali M, Harrison TJ, Dutta S, et al. Design, construction, deployment and testing of a full-scale Repoint Light track switch (I). In: The Stephenson conference: research for railways, institution of mechanical engineers (IMechE); London, 2017, pp.409–416.

11.

Wright N, Bemment S, Ward C, et al. A model of a repoint track switch for control. In: 2014 UKACC international conference on control (CONTROL). New Jersey: IEEE, 2014, pp.549–554.

12.

Branch RAI. Rail accident report: Derailment at Grayrigg 23 February 2007. Report. 2011. London: Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport.

13.

Bei

Zhao

Zhang

, et al. Fuzzy control and co-simulation of automobile semi-active suspension system based on SIMPACK and MATLAB. Appl Mech Mater 2011; 39: 50–54.

14.

Kozek

Benatzky

Schirrer

, et al. Vibration damping of a flexible car body structure using piezo-stack actuators. Control Eng Pract 2011; 19: 298–310.

15.

Lee

Park

Lee

. PID controller tuning to obtain desired closed loop responses for cascade control systems. Ind Eng Chem Res 1998; 37: 1859–1865.

16.

Saleem

Taha

Tutunji

, et al. Identification and cascade control of servo-pneumatic system using particle swarm optimization. Simul Model Pract Theory 2015; 52: 164–179.

17.

Dash

Saikia

Sinha

. Automatic generation control of multi area thermal system using Bat algorithm optimized PD-PID cascade controller. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2015; 68: 364–372. .

18.

Kuo

. Automatic control systems, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR, 1987.