In this paper, a dynamic programming-based optimization analysis is performed to quantitatively assess the energy-saving potential associated to the battery hybridization of railcars, which is nowadays regarded as a high-potential solution to reduce the greenhouse-gas impact of regional trains. A computationally effective longitudinal model is first developed, starting from an available energetic macroscopic representation modeling tool. The resulting simplified railcar model was first integrated with a battery state of charge simulator and then embedded within a fast constrained optimization algorithm. The optimization outcomes, reachable within reasonable timeframe and considering cost-effective hybridization scenarios, are highly informative for train manufacturers and operators interested in substantial hybridization of railcars. Particularly, fuel savings as high as 18% can be achieved with respect to the current diesel-powered trains. As a consequence, useful design and control guidelines are made available, considering both retrofitting or replacing the existing railway systems (particularly focusing on regional trains), while coping with capital and operating costs, safety, and traffic constraints.
FoleyASmythBMPukšecT, et al.A review of developments in technologies and research that have had a direct measurable impact on sustainability considering the Paris agreement on climate change. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2017; 68: 835–839.
2.
La NotteAToninSLucaroniG. Assessing direct and indirect emissions of greenhouse gases in road transportation, taking into account the role of uncertainty in the emissions inventory. Environ Impact Assess Rev2018; 69: 82–93.
3.
Giglioli R, Lutzemberger G, Poli D, et al. Hybridisation of railcars for usage in non-electrified lines. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on clean electrical power: renewable energy resources impact, ICCEP 2017, Santa Margherita Ligure, Italy, 27–29 June, art. no. 8004738, pp.525–530.
4.
DinTHillmansenS. Energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions analysis for a concept design of a hydrogen hybrid railway vehicle. IET Electric Syst Transport2018; 8: 112–121.
5.
MeinertMPrenleloupPSchmidS, et al.Energy storage technologies and hybrid architectures for specific diesel-driven rail duty cycles: design and system integration aspects. Appl Energy2015; 157: 619–629.
6.
JaafarAAkliCSareniB, et al.Sizing and energy management of a hybrid locomotive based on flywheel and accumulators. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2009; 58: 3947–3958.
7.
AgbliKSHisselDSorrentinoM, et al.Reverse engineering of a railcar prototype via energetic macroscopic representation approach. Energy Convers Manage2016; 112: 61–80.
MartinezASBrouwerJSamuelsenGS. Comparative analysis of SOFC-GT freight locomotive fueled by natural gas and diesel with onboard reformation. Appl Energy2015; 148: 421–438.
10.
SorrentinoMRizzoGSorrentinoL. A study aimed at assessing the potential impact of vehicle electrification on grid infrastructure and road-traffic green-house emissions. Appl Energy2014; 120: 31–40.
11.
MartinezASBrouwerJSamuelsenGS. Feasibility study for SOFC-GT hybrid locomotive power: part I. Development of a dynamic 3.5 MW SOFC-GT FORTRAN model. J Power Sources2012; 213: 203–217.
12.
Zhi-ling J, Wei-rong C, Chao-hua D, et al. Optimal energy management for a fuel cell hybrid locomotive. In: Proceedings of the seventh international conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery (FSKD), Yantai, China, vol. 3, 10–12 August 2010.
13.
SaadatMEsfahanianMSaketMH. Reducing fuel consumption of diesel-electric locomotives using hybrid powertrain and fuzzy look-ahead control. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2017; 231: 406–418.
14.
SciarrettaAGuzzellaL. Optimal energy-management strategies. IEEE Control Syst2007; 27: 60–70.
15.
HuXJohannessonLMurgovskiN, et al.Longevity-conscious dimensioning and power management of the hybrid energy storage system in a fuel cell hybrid electric bus. Appl Energy2015; 37: 913–924.
16.
HorreinLBouscayrolAChengY, et al.Influence of the heating system on the fuel consumption of a hybrid electric vehicle. Energy Convers Manage2016; 129: 250–261.
17.
YuHTarsitanoDHuX, et al.Real time energy management strategy for a fast charging electric urban bus powered by hybrid energy storage system. Energy2016; 112: 322–331.
18.
ArsieIGraziosiMPianeseC, et al.Control strategy optimization for hybrid electric vehicles via provisional load estimate. Rev Autom Eng2005; 26: 341–348.
19.
SorrentinoMPianeseCMaiorinoM. An integrated mathematical tool aimed at developing highly performing and cost-effective fuel cell hybrid vehicles. J Power Sources2013; 221: 308–317.
20.
LiuJChenYLiW, et al.Hybrid-trip-model-based energy management of a PHEV with computation-optimized dynamic programming. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2018; 67: 338–353.
21.
ShenJKhalighA. A supervisory energy management control strategy in a battery/ultracapacitor hybrid energy storage system. IEEE Trans Transport Electrif2015; 1: 223–231.
22.
Chen J, Wu J, Wu K, et al. Study on energy management strategy based on DP for range extended electric bus in Chinese driving cycles. In: IEEE conference and expo transportation electrification Asia-Pacific (ITEC Asia-Pacific), Beijing, China, 2014, pp.1–5.
23.
Tang H and Feng X. Train running time allocation algorithm based on dynamic programming. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Chinese control conference, Xi’an, China, 2013, pp.8157–8160.
24.
MatsuuraGMiyatakeM. Optimal train speed profiles by dynamic programming with parallel computing and the fine-tuning of mesh. WIT Trans Built Environ2014; 135: 767–777.
25.
LuSHillmansenSHoTK, et al.Single train trajectory optimisation. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst2013; 14: 743–750.
26.
KoHKosekiTMiyatakeM. Application of dynamic programming to optimization of running profile of a train. WIT Trans Built Environ2004, pp. 74–74.
27.
IchikawaSMiyatakeM. Energy efficiency train trajectory in the railway system with moving block signaling scheme. IEEJ J Ind Appl2019; 8: 586–591.
28.
Lu S, Hillmansen S and Roberts C. Power management strategy study for a multiple unit train. In: IET conference on railway traction systems (RTS 2010), Birmingham, UK, 2010, pp.1–6.
29.
LuSHillmansenSRobertsC. A power management strategy for multiple unit railroad vehicles. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2011; 60: 406–420.
30.
Kuriyama M, Yamamoto S and Miyatake M. Theoretical study on eco-driving technique for an electric vehicle with dynamic programming. In: International conference on electrical machines and systems, Incheon, South Korea, 2010, pp.2026–2030.
31.
MatsudaKKoHMiyatakeM. Train operation minimizing energy consumption in DC electric railway with on-board energy storage device. WIT Trans Built Environ2006, pp. 88–88.
32.
Agbli KS, Devillers N, Hissel D, et al. Energetic macroscopic representation in reverse engineering process: railcar hybridization. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE vehicle power and propulsion conference, Hangzhou, China, 17–20 October 2016.
33.
HoffrichterAHillmansenSRobertsC. Conceptual propulsion system design for a hydrogen-powered regional train. IET Electr Syst Transport2016; 6: 56–66.
34.
XieSHuXLiuT, et al.Predictive vehicle-following power management for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Energy2019; 166: 701–714.
35.
LuJHongSSullivanJ, et al.Predictive transmission shift schedule for improving fuel economy and drivability using electronic horizon. SAE Int J Engines2017; 10: 680–688.
36.
ObaNMiyatakeM. Design of energy-efficient train speed profiles considering fixed-block signalling system. IET Electr Syst Transport2018; 138: 282–290.
37.
YangYPeiHHuX, et al.Fuel economy optimization of power split hybrid vehicles: a rapid dynamic programming approach. Energy2019; 166: 929–938.
38.
BellmanRE. Dynamic programming, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957.
39.
BaccoucheIJemmaliSMlayahA, et al.Implementation of an improved Coulomb-counting algorithm based on a piecewise SOC-OCV relationship for SOC estimation of Li-Ion battery. Int J Renew Energy Res2018; 8: 178–187.
40.
MisyrisGDoukasDIPapadopoulosTA, et al.State-of-charge estimation for Li-ion batteries: a more accurate hybrid approach. IEEE Trans Energy Convers2018; 34: 109–119.
41.
Sundstrom O and Guzzella L. A generic dynamic programming Matlab function. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE conference on control applications, proceedings of the 2009 (CCA) & intelligent control (ISIC), Saint Petersburg, Russia, 2009, 8–10 July 2009, pp.1625–1630.
42.
MusardoCRizzoniGGuezennecY, et al.A-ECMS: an adaptive algorithm for hybrid electric vehicle energy management. Eur J Control2005; 11: 509–524.
