The degradation of track geometry is a very complex phenomenon that has typically been analysed considering global quality indicators. In this paper, the influence of ballast and track substructure on its geometric degradation is analysed by modelling the degradation rates of more than 17,400 local defects of longitudinal levelling, alignment, and twist from 66,892 km of track inspection measurements carried out during the period 2001-2012 on 19 conventional lines of the Portuguese railway network. It is corroborated that singularities markedly contribute to greater density and faster degradation of defects, especially culverts and level crossings. Ballast type and age significantly affect the probability of emergence and degradation rates of defects. In a significant number of situations, defects are found to degrade much faster than the standard deviation indicators, highlighting the importance of monitoring and modelling their evolution to prevent the need for carrying out corrective interventions as much as possible.
AndradeATeixeiraPF. Unplanned-maintenance needs related to rail track geometry. Proc Inst Civ Eng: Transp2014; 167(6): 400–410.
4.
LiDSeligET. Evaluation of railway subgrade problems. Transportation research record 1489. Washington, DC, USA: National Research Council, 1995.
5.
LingbyN. Railway track degradation: shape and influencing factors. Int J Perform Eng2009; 5(2): 177–186.
6.
SauniMLuomalaHKolisojaP, et al.Investigating root causes of railway track geometry deterioration – a data mining approach. Front Built Environ2020; 6(122): 1–11.
DroździelJSowińskiB. Simulation of railway track deterioration influenced by ballast stiffness and dry friction. WIT Trans Built Environ, Computers Railw XI2008; 103: 693–702.
10.
SadeghiJAskarinejadH. Influences of track structure, geometry and traffic parameters on railway deterioration. Int J Eng Trans B: Appl2007; 20(3): 291–300.
11.
CabecinhaL. Análise dos padrões de degradação da qualidade geométrica de via para apoio à estratégia de manutenção – caso de Estudo da Unidade Operacional Sul da Rede Ferroviária Portuguesa. (‘Analysis of the track geometry degradation patterns to support maintenance decisions -Case study of the Southern Unit of the Portuguese Railway Network’). Portugal: Master’s Thesis, Instituto Superior Ténico (IST), University of Lisbon, 2012.
12.
López PitaATeixeiraPFCasasC, et al.Evolution of track geometric quality in high-speed lines: ten years’ experience of the Madrid-Seville line. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2007; 221(2): 147–155.
13.
Le PenLWatsonGPowrieW, et al.The behaviour of railway level crossings: insights through field monitoring. Transp Geotech2014; 1(4): 201–213.
14.
López PitaATeixeiraPF. Resistant track homogeneity: a way to reduce maintenance costs. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference railway engineering, London, UK, 30 April–1 May 2001.
15.
BerggrenE. Railway track stiffness - dynamic measurements and evaluation for efficient maintenance. PhD Thesis. Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), 2009.
16.
NielsenJBerggrenEHammarA, et al.Degradation of railway track geometry – correlation between track stiffness gradient and differential settlement. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2020; 234(1): 108–119.
17.
EbersöhnWTrevizoMCSeligET. Effect of low track modulus on track performance. In: Proceedings of the 5th international heavy haul conference, Beijing, China, 6–13 June 1993.
18.
ShafahiYMasoudiPHakhamaneshiR. Track degradation prediction models, using Markov chain, artificial neural and neuro-fuzzy network. In: 8th world congress on railway research, Seoul, Korea, 2008.
19.
PitaALTeixeiraPFRobustéF. High speed and track deterioration: the role of vertical stiffness of the track. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2004; 218(1): 31–40.
20.
AndradeATeixeiraPF. Uncertainty in rail-track geometry degradation: lisbon-oporto line case study. J Transp Eng2011; 137(3): 193–200.
21.
IndraratnaBBabar SajjadMNgoT, et al.Improved performance of ballasted tracks at transition zones: a review of experimental and modelling approaches. Transp Geotech2019; 21: 100260.
22.
WhiteDSritharanSSuleimanM, et al.Identification of the best practices for design, construction, and repair of bridge approaches. Ames, USA: Report, Iowa State University - Department of Transportation: Center for Transportation Research and Education, 2005.
CoelhoBHölscherPPriestJ, et al.An assessment of transition zone performance. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2011; 225(2): 129–139.
25.
WangHMarkineVLLiuX. Experimental analysis of railway track settlement in transition zones. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2018; 232(4): 1774–1789.
26.
HölscherPMeijersP. Literature study of knowledge and experience of transition zones. Delft, Netherlands: Sage, 2007.
27.
PaixãoAFortunatoECalçadaR. A numerical study on the influence of backfill settlements in the train/track interaction at transition zones to railway bridges. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2016; 230(3): 866–878.
28.
UIC. Best practice guide for optimum track geometry durability. Paris, France: UIC Infrastructure Commission - Civil Engineering Support Group, 2008.
29.
ElkhouryNHitihamillageLMoridpourS, et al.Degradation prediction of rail tracks: a review of the existing literature. Open Transport J2018; 12: 88–104.
30.
SoleimanmeigouniIAhmadiAKumarU. Track geometry degradation and maintenance modelling: a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2018; 232(1): 73–102.
31.
REFER. IT VIA.018 – Tolerâncias dos parâmetros geométricos da via. (‘REFER. IT VIA.018 – Tolerances of the geometric parameters of the track’). Lisbon, Portugal: Rede Ferroviária Nacional, 2008
32.
RodriguesPTeixeiraPF. Modelling degradation rates of track geometry local defects: Lisbon-Porto line case study. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 2022. doi:10.1080/15732479.2022.2127793
33.
RazaliNMYapB. Power comparisons of shapiro-wilk, Kolmogorov-smirnov, lilliefors and anderson-darling tests. J Stat Modelling Analytics2011; 2(1): 21–33.
34.
AndradeAR. Prediction and optimization of maintenance and renewal actions related to rail track geometry. PhD Thesis. Portugal: Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), University of Lisbon, 2014.
35.
GrossoniILe PenLMJorgeP, et al.The role of stiffness variation in switches and crossings: comparison of vehicle–track interaction models with field measurements. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2020; 234(10): 1184–1197.
36.
KarisTBergMStichelS. Analysing the correlation between vehicle responses and track irregularities using dynamic simulations and measurements. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2020; 234(2): 170–182.
37.
BurrowMTeixeiraPFDahlbergT, et al.Track stiffness considerations for high speed railway lines. In: Railway Transportation: Policies, Technology and Perspectives. 2nd ed. Hauppauge, New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2009, pp. 303–354.
38.
SoleimanmeigouniI.Predictive models for railway track geometry degradation. PhD Thesis. Luleå, Sweden: Luleå University of Technology, 2019.
39.
CEN. UNE EN 13848-5:2018: Railway applications – Track - Track geometry 576 quality, part 5: Geometric quality levels – Plain line, switches and crossings. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization, 2017.
