Flame stabilization in a supersonic combustor with hydrogen injection upstream of cavity flame holders: experiments and simulations

Abstract

Experimental observations and numerical simulation were conducted to study the flame characteristics and flame stabilization mechanism in a supersonic combustor with hydrogen injection upstream of cavity flame holders. OH radical distribution of the reacting flowfield was obtained using OH spontaneous emission and OH-PLIF (planar laser-induced fluorescence). The supersonic combustion flowfield with L/D = 7 cavity was calculated by large eddy simulation. The turbulence–combustion interaction model was based on a partially premixed flamelet model with a level-set approach. The results showed that hydrogen fuels were transported into the cavity shear; lean mixture and rich mixture were produced in the internal cavity and the declining jet, respectively. An approximately steady partially premixed flame front exists in the cavity shear layer. The flame front propagates and extends to the region around the fuel jet due to the interaction of counter-rotating vortices induced by the jet with the cavity shear layer. The flame front sustained in the shear layer likely penetrates the jet core and ignites the whole jet. Behind the flame front, most of the jet beam is burned as diffusion flames. The physical process of the flame stabilization demonstrated the similarity with triple flame characteristics, which indicted that triple flame theory might be the basic flame stabilization mechanism of the cavity flame holders.

Keywords

flame stabilization cavity flameholder large eddy simulation partially premixed flamelet model triple flame

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sun

M. B.

Wang

Z. G.

Liang

J. H.

Geng

Flame characteristics in a supersonic combustor with hydrogen injection upstream of a cavity flameholder. J. Propul. Power, 2008, 24(4), 688–696.

Donbar

J. M.

Gruber

M. R.

Jackson

T. A.

Carter

C. D.

Mathur

OH planar laser-induced fluorescence imaging in a hydrocarbon-fueled scramjet combustor. Proc. Combust. Inst., 2000, 28, 679–687.

Rasmussen, C. C. An experimental study of flame stability in a directly-fueled wall cavity with a supersonic free stream. PhD Thesis, University of Michigan, 2006.

Micka, D. J. and Driscoll, J. F. Reaction zone imaging in a dual-mode Scramjet combustor using CH-PLIF. AIAA 2008-5071, 2008.

Gruber

M. R.

Donbar

J. M.

Carter

C. D.

Hsu

K.-Y.

Mixing and combustion studies using cavity-based flameholders in a supersonic flow. J. Propul. Power, 2004, 20(5), 769–779.

Rasmussen

C. C.

Driscoll

J. F.

Carter

C. D.

Hsu

K.-Y.

Characteristics of cavity-stabilized flames in a supersonic flow. J. Propul. Power, 2005, 21(4), 765–769.

Rasmussen

C. C.

Driscolla

J. F.

Hsub

K.-Y.

Stability limits of cavity-stabilized flames in supersonic flow. Proc. Combust. Inst., 2005, 30, 2825–2834.

Thakur, A. and Segal, C. Analyses of non-premixed flameholding behind a step in supersonic flow. AIAA 2006-1380, 2006.

Peters

Turbulent combustion, 2000 (University Press, Cambridge).

10.

Lyons

K. M.

Toward an understanding of the stabilization mechanisms of lifted turbulent jet flames: Experiments. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 2007, 33, 211–231.

11.

Sun

M. B.

Liang

J. H.

Wang

Z. G.

A modified blending function for zonal hybrid Reynolds–averaged Navier–Stokes/large-eddy simulation methodology. Proc. IMechE, Part G: J. Aerospace Engineering, 2009, 223(8), 1067–1081.

12.

Buckmaster

Weber

Edge flame holding. Proc. Combust. Inst., 1996, 26, 1143–1149.

13.

Buckmaster

Matalon

Anomalous Lewis number effects in tribrachial flames. Proc. Combust. Inst., 1998, 22, 1527–1535.

14.

Ladeinde, F. A Critical review of Scramjet combustion simulation. AIAA 2009-127, 2009.

15.

Balakrishnan

Williams

F. A.

Turbulent combustion regimes for hypersonic propulsion employing hydrogen/air diffusion flames. J. Propul. Power, 1994, 10(3), 434–436.

16.

Bray

K. N. C.

The challenge of turbulent combustion. Symp. (Int.) Combust., 1996, 26, 1–26.

17.

Waidmann

Alff

Böhm

Brummund

Clau

Oschwald

Supersonic combustion of hydrogen/air in a SCRAMJET combustion chamber. Space Technol., 1995, 15(6), 421–429.

18.

Zhang, X. and Edwards, J. A. A Computational analysis of supersonic jet and instability wave interaction. AIAA Paper 94-2194, 1994.

19.

Sabelnikov

Deshaies

Figueira

L. F.

Silva

Revisited flamelet model for nonpremixed combustion in supersonic turbulent flows. Combust. Flame, 1998, 114, 577–584.

20.

Oevermann

Numerical investigation of turbulent hydrogen combustion in a SCRAMJET using flamelet modeling. Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2000, 4, 463–480.

21.

Berglund

Fureby

LES of supersonic combustion in a scramjet engine model. Proc. Combust. Inst., 2007, 31, 2497–2504.

22.

Kim

W. W.

Menon

Mongia

Large eddy simulations of a gas turbine combustor flow. Combust. Sci. Technol., 1999, 143, 25–62.

23.

Muller

C. M.

Breitbach

Peters

Partially premixed turbulent flame propagation in jet flames. Twenty-Fifth. Symp. (Int.) Combust., 1994, 25, 1099–1106.

24.

Chung

Propagation of unsteady tribrachial flames in laminar nonpremixed jets. Combust. Flame, 1999, 117, 151–163.

25.

FlameMaster Software, http://www.stanford.edu/group/pitsch/FlameMaster.htm.

26.

Nogenmyr

K. J.

Petersson

Bai

X. S.

Nauert

Large eddy simulation and experiments of stratified lean premixed methane/air turbulent flames. Proc. Combust. Inst., 2007, 31, 1467–1475.

27.

Shu

C. W.

Barth

T. J.

Deconinck

High order ENO and WENO schemes for computational fluid dynamics. High-order methods for computational physics, 1999 (Springer, Berlin), 439–582.

28.

Sun

M. B.

Wang

Z. G.

Bai

X. S.

Assessment and modification of sub-cell-fix method for re-initialization of level-set distance function. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 2010, 62, 211–236.

29.

Sun

M. B.

Geng

Liang

J. H.

Wang

Z. G.

Mixing characteristics in a supersonic combustor with gaseous fuel injection upstream of a cavity flameholder. Flow Turbul. Combust., 2009, 82, 271–286.

30.

Jeong

Hussain

On the identification of a vortex. J. Fluid Mech., 1995, 285, 69–94.