Robust multi-fidelity design of a micro re-entry unmanned space vehicle

Abstract

This article addresses the preliminary robust design of a small-scale re-entry unmanned space vehicle by means of a hybrid optimization technique. The approach, developed in this article, closely couples an evolutionary multi-objective algorithm with a direct transcription method for optimal control problems. The evolutionary part handles the shape parameters of the vehicle and the uncertain objective functions, while the direct transcription method generates an optimal control profile for the re-entry trajectory. Uncertainties on the aerodynamic forces and characteristics of the thermal protection material are incorporated into the vehicle model, and a Monte-Carlo sampling procedure is used to compute relevant statistical characteristics of the maximum heat flux and internal temperature. Then, the hybrid algorithm searches for geometries that minimize the mean value of the maximum heat flux, the mean value of the maximum internal temperature, and the weighted sum of their variance: the evolutionary part handles the shape parameters of the vehicle and the uncertain functions, while the direct transcription method generates the optimal control profile for the re-entry trajectory of each individual of the population. During the optimization process, artificial neural networks are utilized to approximate the aerodynamic forces required by the optimal control solver. The artificial neural networks are trained and updated by means of a multi-fidelity approach: initially a low-fidelity analytical model, fitted on a waverider type of vehicle, is used to train the neural networks, and through the evolution a mix of analytical and computational fluid dynamic, high-fidelity computations are used to update it. The data obtained by the high-fidelity model progressively become the main source of updates for the neural networks till, near the end of the optimization process, the influence of the data obtained by the analytical model is practically nullified. On the basis of preliminary results, the adopted technique is able to predict achievable performance of the small spacecraft and the requirements in terms of thermal protection materials.

Keywords

multi-objective evolutionary algorithms robust multi-disciplinary design meta-modelling optimal control unmanned space vehicles

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Umakant

Sudhakar

Mujumdar

Raghavendra Rao

Ranking based uncertainty quantification for a multifidelity design approach. J. Aircraft, 2007, 44(2), 410–419.

Doherty

J. J.

Dean

S. R. H.

Ellsmore

Eldridge

Curran

Chou

S. Y.

Trappey

A multi-fidelity approach for supporting early aircraft design decisions. Collaborative product and service life cycle management for a sustainable world, 2008 (Springer London, London) 267–279.

Choi

Alonso

Kroo

Wintzer

Multifidelity design optimization of low-boom supersonic jets. J. Aircraft, 2008, 45(1), 106–118.

Choi

Alonso

Kroo

Two-level multifidelity design optimization studies for supersonic jets. J. Aircraft, 2009, 46(3), 776–790.

Robinson

Eldred

Willcox

Haimes

Surrogate-based optimization using multifidelity models with variable parameterization and corrected space mapping. AIAA J., 2008, 46(11), 2814–2822.

Singh

Grandhi

Mixed-variable optimization strategy employing multifidelity simulation and surrogate models. AIAA J., 2009, 48(1), 215–223.

Vasile

Bernelli-Zazzera

Optimizing low-thrust and gravity assist maneuvres to design interplanetary trajectories. J. Astronaut. Sci., 2003, 51(1), 13–35.

Vasile, M. and Bernelli-Zazzera, F. Targeting a heliocentric orbit combining lowthrust propulsion and gravity assist manoeuvres. In Operational research in space & air, first edition, vol. 79, 2003 (Kluwer Academy Press, Dordrecht, The Nederlands).

Fornberg

A practical guide to pseudospectral methods, 1998 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

10.

Russo, G. and De Matteis, P. P. Prora-usv: Two flight mission exploring transonic conditions. In Proceedings of the 15th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Dayton, Ohio, USA, 2008, AIAA 2008-2660. Proceedings published on CD-ROM.

11.

Savino

Paterna

Serpico

Numerical and experimental investigation of prora usv subsonic and transonic aerodynamics. J. Spacecraft Rockets, 2006, 43(3), 575–584.

12.

Russo

Usv program status 2009. 2009, Proceedings of the 16th AIAA/DLR/DGLR International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, (Washington, DC) AIAA-2009-7269. Proceedings published on CD-ROM.

13.

Viviani

Pezzella

Heat transfer analysis for a winged reentry flight test bed. Int. J. Eng., 2009, 3(3), 330–345.

14.

Squire

T. H.

Marschall

Material property requirements for analysis and design of UHTC components in hypersonic applications. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2010, 30(1), 2239–2251.

15.

Strohmeyer

Eggers

Haupt

Waverider aerodynamics and preliminary design for two-stage-to-orbit missions, part 1. J. Spacecraft Rockets, 1998, 35(4), 450–458.

16.

Heinze

Bardenhagen

Waverider aerodynamics and preliminary design for two-stage-to-orbit missions, part 2. J. Spacecraft Rockets, 1998, 35(4), 459–466.

17.

Starkey

R. P.

Lewis

M. J.

Analytical off-design lift-to-drag-ratio analysis for hypersonic waveriders. J. Spacecraft Rockets, 2000, 37(5), 684–691.

18.

Chapman

C. J.

High speed flow, 2000 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

19.

White

F. M.

Viscous fluid flow, 1974 (McGraw-Hill, New York).

20.

Aupoix

Cousteix

Murthy

T. K. S.

Real gas effects in two- and three-dimensional hypersonic, laminar boundary layers. Computational methods in hypersonic aerodynamics, 1991 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Nederlands) 293–340.

21.

Pezzella

Viviani

Aerodynamic analysis of a manned space vehicle for missions to mars. J. Thermodyn., 2011, 2011, 1–13.

22.

Savino

De Stefano Fumo

Paterna

Serpico

Aerothermodynamic study of UHTC-based thermal protection systems. Aerospace Sci. Technol., 2005, 9, 151–160.

23.

Anderson, J. D. Hypersonic and high-temperature gas dynamics, second edition, 2006, (AIAA, Virginia).

24.

Cowart, K. and Olds, J. Integrating aeroheating and TPS into conceptual RLV design, 1999, AIAA 99-4806 (AIAA, New York, USA).

25.

Hankey

W. L.

Re-entry aerodynamics (AIAA education series), 1988 (AIAA, New York, USA.

26.

Lozano

J. A.

Larranaga

Inza

Towards a new evolutionary computation: advances on estimation of distribution algorithms (studies in fuzziness and soft computing), February 2006 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany.

27.

Costa, M. and Minisci, E. MOPED: a multi-objective parzen-based estimation of distribution algorithm. In Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization. second international conference, EMO 2003 (Eds C. M. Fonseca, P. J. Fleming, E. Zitzler, K. Deb, L. Thiele), 8–11 April 2003, Vol. 2632 of LNCS pp. 282–294 (Springer, Faro, Portugal).

28.

Avanzini, G., Biamonti, D., and Minisci, E. A. Minimum-fuel/minimum-time maneuvers of formation flying satellites. In Proceedings of the Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, AAS 03-654, Big Sky, Montana, 3–7 August 2003.

29.

Deb

Pratap

Agarwal

Meyarivan

A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 2002, 6(2), 182–197.

30.

Fukunaga

Introduction to statistical pattern recognition, 1972 (Academic Press, New York).

31.

Jin

Olhofer

Sendhoff

Framework for evolutionary optimization with approximate fitness functions. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 2002, 6(5), 481–494.

32.

Forrester

A. I.

Sobester

Keane

A. J.

Engineering design via surrogate modelling: a practical guide, 2006 (Wiley, Chichester, USA.

33.

Shyy

Papila

Vaidyanathan

Tucker

Global design optimization for aerodynamics and rocket propulsion components. Prog. Aerospace Sci., 2001, 37, 59–118.

34.

Giannakoglou

K. C.

Design of optimal aerodynamic shapes using stochastic optimization methods and computational intelligence. Prog. Aerospace Sci., 2002, 38, 43–76.

35.

MacKay

D. J. C.

Bayesian interpolation. Neural Comput., 1992, 4(3), 415–447.