Use of calculus of variations to determine the shape of hovering rotors of minimum power and its application to micro air vehicles

Abstract

In this paper, calculus of variations and combined blade element and momentum theory (BEMT) are used to demonstrate that, in hover, when neither root nor tip losses are considered; the rotor, which minimizes the total power (MPR), generates an induced velocity that varies linearly along the blade span. The angle of attack of every blade element is constant and equal to its optimum value. The traditional ideal twist (ITR) and optimum (OR) rotors are revisited in the context of this variational framework. Two more optimum rotors are obtained considering root and tip losses, the ORL, and the MPRL. A comparison between these five rotors is presented and discussed. The MPR and MPRL present a remarkable saving of power for low values of both thrust coefficient and maximum aerodynamic efficiency. The result obtained can be exploited to improve the aerodynamic behaviour of rotary wing micro air vehicles (MAV). A comparison with experimental results obtained from the literature is presented.

Keywords

micro air vehicles low Reynolds number aerodynamics calculus of variations hovering rotor aerodynamic optimization blade element momentum theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Pines

Bohorquez

Samuel

P. D.

Challenges facing future micro-air-vehicle development. J. Aircraft, 2006, 43(2), 290–305.

Tsuzuki

Sato

Abe

Design guidelines of rotary wings in hover for insect-scale micro air vehicle applications. J. Aircraft, 2007, 44(1), 252–263.

Ganguli

Survey of recent developments in rotorcraft design optimization. J. Aircraft, 2004, 41(3), 493–510.

Nadarajah

S. K.

Tatossian

Multi-objective aerodynamic shape optimization for unsteady viscous flows. Optimization and Engng, 2010, 11(1), 67–105.

Le Pape

Beaumier

Numerical optimization of helicopter rotor aerodynamic performance in hover. Aerospace Sci. Technol., 2005, 9(3), 191–201.

Rand

Khromov

Peyran

R. J.

Minimum-induced power loss of a helicopter rotor via circulation optimization. J. Aircraft, 2004, 41(1), 104–109.

Leishman

J. G.

Ananthan

An optimum coaxial rotor system for axial flight. J. Am. Helicopter Soc., 2008, 53(4), 366–381.

Ganguli

Jehnert

Wolfram

Vrsmann

Optimal location of centre of gravity for swashplateless helicopter UAV and MAV. Aircraft Engng Aerospace Technol., 2007, 79(4), 335–345.

Siva

Murugan

M. S.

Ganguli

Effect of uncertainty on helicopter performance predictions. Proc. IMechE, Part G: J. Aerospace Engineering, 2010, 224(5), 549–562.

10.

Sunada

Sakaguchi

Kawachi

Airfoil section characteristics at a low Reynolds number. J. Fluids Engng, 1997, 119, 129–135.

11.

Bohorquez

Pines

Samuel

P. D.

Small rotor design optimization using blade element momentum theory and hover tests. J. Aircraft, 2010, 47(1), 268–283.

12.

Lissaman

P. B. S.

Low-Reynolds-number airfoils. A. Rev. Fluid Mechanics, 1983, 15, 223–239.

13.

Vogel

Flight in drosophila. iii. aerodynamic characteristics of fly wings and wing models. J. Expl. Biol., 1967, 46, 431–443.

14.

Carmichael

B. H.

Low Reynolds number airfoil survey. NASA-CR-165803, November 1981.

15.

Ramasamy

Leishman

J. G.

Lee

T. E.

Flow field of a rotating-wing micro air vehicle. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Forum and Technology Display of the American Helicopter Society, Phoenix, Arizona, 2006, pp. 1–10.

16.

Bohorquez

Samuel

P. D.

Sirohi

Rudd

Pines

Design, analysis and hover performance of a rotary wing micro air vehicle. J. Am. Helicopter Soc., 2003, 48(2), 80–90.

17.

Tokaty

G. A.

A history and philosophy of fluid mechanics, 1994 (Dover Publications).

18.

Gessow

Myers Jr

G. C.

Aerodynamics of the helicopter, 1967 (Frederick Ungar Publishing).

19.

Johnson

Helicopter theory, 1994 (Dover Publications).

20.

Leishman

J. G.

Principles of helicopter aerodynamics cambridge aerospace S, 2nd edn, 2006 (Cambridge University Press).

21.

Bryson

A. E.

Jr. Ho

Applied optimal control, 1975 (Taylor & Francis).

22.

Miley

S. J.

A catalog of low Reynolds number airfoil data for wind turbine applications. RFP-3387 VC-60, US Department of Energy Rockwell International, 1982.

23.

Bohorquez

Rankins

Baeder

J. D.

Pines

Hover performance of rotor blades at low Reynolds numbers for rotary wing micro air vehicles. An experimental and CFD study. In Proceedings of AIAA 21st Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2003.