Combustion characteristic using O 2 -pilot strut in a liquid-kerosene-fueled strut-based dual-mode scramjet

Abstract

A set of exploratory experiments are conducted to test a newly designed strut for fuel injection and flame holding in a liquid-kerosene-fueled dual-mode scramjet combustor. The thickness of the strut is 8 mm and the front blockage is about 8%. To organize stable combustion in a Mach number equal to 2.6 air flow under this thin strut using room-temperature liquid kerosene in a flash wall combustor without any cavity and other flame holders, some oxygen is injected through a set of orifices at the back of the strut, based on which a stable center local flame is generated at the back of the strut and the main flow combustion can be organized around this local flame. Experimental results show that stable combustion can be achieved at the center of the combustor with a wide range of equivalence ratio from 0.19 to 1 based on this center flame strut strategy. Through the analysis of the pressure distribution along the combustor, different combustor modes appear with different equivalence ratio. The article also gives some discussions about different influence of the oxygen to the combustion process under different equivalence ratio.

Keywords

Strut center flame liquid kerosene dual-mode scramjet oxygen

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Tishkoff JM, Drummond JP, Edwards T, et al. Future direction of supersonic combustion research. Air Force/NASA Workshop on Supersonic Combustion, AIAA Paper 97-1017, 1997.

Waltrup

. Liquid fueled supersonic combustion ramjets: a research prospective of the past, present and future. J Propul Power 1987; 8(6): 515–524.

Segal C. The scramjet engine - Process and characteristics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Gruber

Donbar

Carter

. Mixing and combustion studies using cavity-based flame holders in a supersonic flow. J Propul Power 2004; 20(5): 769–778.

Rasmussen

Driscoll

Carter

. Characteristics of cavity-stabilized flame in a supersonic flow. J Propul Power 2005; 21(4): 765–768.

Allen W, King P, Carter C, et al. Fuel-air injection effects on combustion in cavity-based flame holders in a supersonic flow. AIAA Paper 2005-4105, 2005.

Ben-Yakar

Hanson

. Cavity flame-holders for ignition and flame stabilization in scramjets: an overview. J Propul Power 2001; 17(4): 869–877.

McDaniel J, Fletcher D, Hartfield R Jr, et al. Staged transverse injection into mach 2 flow behind a rearward-facing step: a 3-D compressible test case for hypersonic combustor code validation. AIAA Paper 91-5071, 1991.

Mohieldin TO, Tiwari SN and Olynciw MJ. Asymmetric flow-structures in dual mode scramjet combustor with significant upstream interaction. AIAA Paper 2001-3296, 2001.

10.

Thakur A and Segal C. Flameholding analyses in supersonic flow. AIAA Paper 2003-6909, 2003.

11.

Thakur A and Segal C. Analyses of non-premixed flame holding behind a step in supersonic flow. AIAA Paper 2006-1380, 2006.

12.

Masuya

Komuro

Ohwaki

. Ignition and combustion performance of scramjet combustors with fuel injection struts. J Propul Power 1995; 11(2): 301–307.

13.

Mitani

Kanda

Nakahashi

. Drags in scramjet engine testing: experimental and computational fluid dynamics studies. J Propul Power 1999; 15(4): 578–583.

14.

Mitani

Chinzei

Kanda

. Reaction and mixing controlled combustion in scramjet engines. J Propul Power 2001; 17(2): 308–314.

15.

Tomioka

Murakami

Kudo

. Combustion tests of a staged supersonic combustor with a strut. J Propul Power 2001; 17(2): 293–300.

16.

Tomioka

Kobayashi

Kudo

. Effects of injection configuration on performance of a staged supersonic combustor. J Propul Power 2003; 19(5): 876–884.

17.

Glawe DD, Saminy M, Nejad AS, et al. Effects of nozzle geometry on parallel injection from base of an extended strut into a supersonic flow. AIAA Paper 95-0522, 1995.

18.

Wepler U and Koschel W. Numerical investigation of turbulent reacting flows in a scramjet combustor model. AIAA Paper 2002-3572, 2002.

19.

Sunami T, Magre P, Bresson A, et al. Experimental study of strut injectors in a supersonic combustor using OH-PLIF. AIAA Paper 2005-3304, 2005.

20.

Bouchez M, Montazel X and Dufour E. Hydrogen fueled airbreathing propulsion for high speed missiles. AIAA Paper 98-3729, 1998.

21.

Dufour E and Bouchez M. Computational analysis of a kerosene-fueled scramjet. AIAA Paper 2001-1817, 2001.

22.

Vinogradov

Kobigsky

Petrov

. Experimental investigation of kerosene fuel combustion in supersonic flow. J Propul Power 1995; 11(1): 130–134.

23.

Bullman MJ and Siebenhaar A. Rocket based combined cycle propulsion. IAF-95-S.5.02, 1995.

24.

Daines

Segal

. Combined rocket and airbreathing propulsion system for space-launch applications. J Propul Power 1998; 14(5): 605–611.

25.

Kanda

Kudo

. Conceptual study of a combined-cycle engine for an aerospace plane. J Propul Power 2003; 19(5): 859–867.

26.

Siebenhaar A and Bulrman MJ. The strutjet engine: the overlooked option for space launch. AIAA Paper 95-3124, 1995.

27.

Siebenhaar A and Bulman M. Development and testing of the aerojet strutjet combustor. AIAA Paper 99-4868, 1999.

28.

Campbell

Siebenhaar

Nguyen

. Strut engine performance. J Propul Power 2001; 17(6): 1227–1232.

29.

Tomioka S, Kudo K and Kato K. Auxiliary injection for combustion augmentation of G/G plume in a RBCC combustor. AIAA Paper 2005-4284, 2005.

30.

Muller

Hawk

. Mixing of supersonic jets in a strutjet propulsion system. J Propul Power 2001; 17(5): 1129–1131.

31.

Rocci-Denis S, Maier D and Kau H-P. Staged injection in a dual-mode combustor for an air-breathing engine. AIAA Paper 2008-2632, 2008.

32.

Fuhrmann S, Hupfer A and Kau H-P. Investigations on multi-stage supersonic combustion in a model combustor. AIAA Paper 2011-2332, 2011.

33.

Dessornes O and Bouchez M. Combustion experiments of liquid kerosene and hydrogen/methane mixing in a dual mode ramjet. AIAA Paper 2005-3400, 2005.